Zusammenfassung
Die Strahlenbehandlung des Hodgkin-Lymphoms erfuhr eine Entwicklung von der Extended-Field- zur Involved-Field- (IF-)Radiotherapie bei anhaltend hohen Heilungsraten. Kürzlich erschienene Publikationen empfehlen die weitere Reduktion der Bestrahlungsvolumina hin zur Involved-Node- (IN-)Radiotherapie. Allerdings ist dieses Vorgehen bislang nicht innerhalb randomisierter klinischer Studien geprüft worden. Daher wird die Deutsche Hodgkin Studiengruppe in der zukünftigen HD17-Studie die IF- mit der IN-Radiotherapie vergleichen. Das klinische Zielvolumen (CTV, „clinical target volume“) umfasst die initial als befallen gewerteten Lymphknoten. Es berücksichtigt die initiale Ausdehnung der Erkrankung inklusive der Verlagerung von Normalgeweben. Der Sicherheitssaum des Planungszielvolumens (PTV, „planning target volume“) sollte in axialer Ausdehnung 2 cm, in kraniokaudaler Ausrichtung 3 cm betragen. Um die Lungentoxizität und kardiale Toxizität gering zu halten, wird im Mediastinum ein anderes Vorgehen empfohlen. Das Konzept der IN-Radiotherapie soll das Auftreten radiogener Toxizitäten, inklusive Zweitneoplasien, weiter minimieren. Die Feldgrößen werden im Vergleich zur IF-Radiotherapie weiter abnehmen.
Abstract
Radiotherapy of Hodgkin’s lymphoma has evolved from extended-field to involved-field (IF) radiotherapy which reduces toxicity whilst maintaining high rates of healing. Recent publications recommend further reduction of the radiation field to involved-node (IN) radiotherapy; however, this concept has never been tested in a randomized trial. The German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) aims to compare IN with standard IF radiotherapy in the future HD17 trial.
The clinical target volume (CTV) encompasses the initial volume of the lymph node(s) before chemotherapy and incorporates the initial location and extent of the disease, taking into account the displacement of the normal tissues. The margin of the planning target volume (PTV) should be 2 cm in the axial and 3 cm in the craniocaudal direction. To minimize lung and cardiac toxicity the target definition in the mediastinum is different. The concept of IN radiotherapy has been proposed as a means to further improve the therapeutic ratio by reducing the risk of radiation-induced toxicity, including second malignancies. Field sizes will further decrease compared to IF radiotherapy.
Literatur
Dühmke E, Franklin J, Pfreundschuh M et al (2001) Low-dose radiation is sufficient for the noninvolved extended field treatment in favourable early-stage Hodgkin’s disease: long-term results of a randomized trial of radiotherapy alone. J Clin Oncol 19(11):2905–2914
Eich HT, Staar S, Gossmann A et al (2004) Centralized radiation oncological review of cross-sectional imaging of Hodgkin’s disease leads to significant changes of the required involved field – results of a quality assurance program of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58(4):1120–1126
Eich HT, Müller R-P, Schneeweiss A et al (2004) Initiation of a teleradiotherapeutic network for patients in German lymphoma studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58(3):805–808
Eich HT, Hansemann K, Müller R-P (2005) Behandlung früher Stadien des Hodgkin-Lymphoms unter dem Aspekt der Qualitätssicherung. Onkologe 11:924–932
Eich HT, Müller R-P, Engert A et al (2005) Comparison of 30 Gy versus 20 Gy involved field radiotherapy after two versus four cycles ABVD in early stage Hodgkin’s lymphoma: interim analysis of the German Hodgkin Study Group Trial HD10. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63(2)(Suppl 1):1
Eich HT, Haverkamp U, Engert A et al (2005) Biophysical analysis of the acute toxicity of radiotherapy in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma – a comparison between extended field and involved field radiotherapy based on the data of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63(3):860–865
Eich HT, Müller R-P (2005) The radiotherapy reference panel – experiences and results of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG). Eur J Haematol 75(Suppl 66):98–105
Eich HT, Gossmann A, Engert A et al (2007) A contribution to solve the problem of the need for consolidative radiotherapy after intensive chemotherapy in advanced stages of Hodgkin’s lymphoma – analysis of a quality control program initiated by the radiotherapy reference center of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69(4):1187–1192
Eich HT, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Hansemann K et al (2008) Quality control of involved field radiotherapy in patients with early-favorable (HD10) and early-unfavorable (HD11) Hodgkin’s lymphoma – an analysis of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71(5):1419–1424
Eich HT, Müller R-P, Engenhart-Cabillic R et al (2008) Involved Node Radiotherapy in early-stage Hodgkin’s Lymphoma – Definition and Guidelines of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG). Strahlenther Onkol 184(8):406–410
Engert A, Schiller P, Josting A et al (2003) Involved-field radiotherapy is equally effective and less toxic compared with extended-field radiotherapy after four cycles of chemotherapy in patients with early-stage unfavourable Hodgkin’s lymphoma: results of the HD8 trial of the German Hodgkin’s lymphoma Study Group. J Clin Oncol 21(19):3601–3608
Franklin J, Pluetschow A, Paus M et al (2006) Second malignancy risk associated with treatment of Hodgkin’s lymphoma: meta-analysis of the randomised trials. Ann Oncol 17:1749–1760
Girinsky T, Maazen R van der, Specht L et al (2006) Involved-node radiotherapy (INRT) in patients with early Hodgkin lymphoma: concepts and guidelines. Radiother Oncol 79(3):270–277
ICRU: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Washington/DC; ICRU 50 (1993) Report: Prescribing, recording and reporting photon beam therapy, September; ICRU 62; Supplement to ICRU Report 50; November 1999
Müller R-P, Eich HT (2005) Current role of radiotherapy in the treatment of Hodgkin’s disease. In: Perez CA, Brady LW, Halperin EC, Schmidt-Ullrich RK (eds) Update Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 6(2):2–15
Shahidi M, Kamangari N, Ashley S et al (2006) Site of relapse after chemotherapy alone for stage I and II Hodgkin’s disease. Radiother Oncol 78:1–5
Zimmermann C, Hilger T, Kriz J et al (2009) Vergleich der Involved Field- versus Involved Node Radiotherapie beim Hodgkin Lymphom: Eine Planungsanalyse. Strahlenther Onkol 185(Suppl 1):26
Interessenkonflikt
Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eich, H., Zimmermann, C. & Müller, RP. Involved-Node-Radiotherapie in frühen Stadien des Hodgkin-Lymphoms. Onkologe 16, 35–40 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-009-1768-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-009-1768-z