The relationship between gender and life satisfaction: analysis across demographic groups and global regions


This study sought to examine gender differences in life satisfaction globally and across demographic groups. The grouping variables included age, global region, marital status, employment status, education, and income. A sample of 1,801,417 participants across 166 countries was drawn from the Gallup World Poll. Given the hierarchical nature of the data, multi-level modeling was used for data analysis. Gender differences in life satisfaction were found to be significant yet small. Women reported higher levels of life satisfaction than men across all income, education, and employment groups. The direction of gender differences in life satisfaction was inconsistent across age and regional groups. Men scored higher than women only over the age of about 63, and in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite the less favorable objective conditions for women globally, women were found to be more satisfied with their lives than men across most of the groups we studied. It is hoped that the present results can be used to inform research and practice aiming to identify vulnerable female groups and to optimize the well-being of women globally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Data availability

For more information about the data file used in this study, see Gallup’s official website:


  1. 1.

    People older than 99 are also coded as 99 in the GWP. In the whole GWP sample, 581 participants are coded as 99.


  1. Batz C, Tay L (2018) Gender differences in subjective well-being. In: Diener E, Oishi S, Tay L (eds) Handbook of well-being. DEF Publishers, Salt Lake City

  2. Blackden M, Canagarajah S, Klasen S, Lawson D (2007) Gender and growth in sub-Saharan Africa: issues and evidence. In: Mavrotas G, Shorrocks A (eds) Advancing development. Studies in development economics and policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 349–370

  3. Bouson JB (2016) Shame and the aging woman: confronting and resisting ageism in contemporary women’s writings. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  4. Brown H, Prescott R (2015) Applied mixed models in medicine. Wiley, Chichester

  5. Cantril H (1965) Pattern of human concerns. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick

  6. Cheung F, Lucas RE (2014) Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: results from three large samples. Qual Life Res 23:2809–2818.

  7. Clemente F, Sauer W (1976) Life satisfaction in the United States. Social Forces 54(3):621–631.

  8. Diener ED, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S (1985) The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess 49(1):71–75.

  9. Eckermann E (2012) The quality of life of adults. In: Land KC, Michalos AC, Sirgy MJ (eds) Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research. Springer, New York, pp 373–380

  10. Fortin N, Helliwell JF, Wang S (2015) How does subjective well-being vary around the world by gender and age? In: Helliwell JF, Layard R, Sachs J (eds) World happiness report. Sustainable Development Solutions Network, New York, pp 42–75 Retrieved from

  11. Geerling DM, Diener E (2019) Effect size strengths in subjective well-being research. Appl Res Qual Life.

  12. Glaesmer H, Grande G, Braehler E, Roth M (2011) The German version of the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS): psychometric properties, validity, and population-based norms. Eur J Psychol Assess 27(2):127–132.

  13. Goldbeck L, Schmitz TG, Besier T, Herschbach P, Henrich G (2007) Life satisfaction decreases during adolescence. Qual Life Res 16:969–979.

  14. Graham C, Chattopadhyay S (2013) Gender and well-being around the world. Int J Happiness Dev 1(2):212–232.

  15. Helliwell JF, Putnam RD (2004) The social context of well-being. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 359(1449):1435–1446.

  16. Hox J (2010) Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. Routledge, New York

  17. Hyde JS (2005) The gender similarities hypothesis. Am Psychol 60(6):581–592.

  18. Inglehart R (1990) Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  19. Inglehart R (2002) Gender, aging, and subjective well-being. Int J Comp Sociol 43(3–5):391–408.

  20. Joshanloo M (2018) Gender differences in the predictors of life satisfaction across 150 nations. Personal Individ Differ 135:312–315

  21. Jovanović V (2016) The validity of the satisfaction with life scale in adolescents and a comparison with single-item life satisfaction measures: a preliminary study. Qual Life Res 25:3173–3180.

  22. Jovanović V (2019) Measurement invariance of the Serbian version of the satisfaction with life scale across age, gender, and time. Eur J Psychol Assess:1–9.

  23. Jovanović V, Lazić M (2019) Is longer always better? A comparison of the validity of single-item versus multiple-item measures of life satisfaction. Appl Res Qual Life.

  24. Kleven H, Landais C (2017) Gender inequality and economic development: fertility, education and norms. Economica 84(334):180–209.

  25. Kong F, Ding K, Zhao J (2015) The relationships among gratitude, self-esteem, social support and life satisfaction among undergraduate students. J Happiness Stud 16(2):477–489.

  26. Lucas RE, Donnellan MB (2012) Estimating the reliability of single-item life satisfaction measures: results from four national panel studies. Soc Indic Res 105(3):323–331.

  27. Meisenberg G, Woodley MA (2015) Gender differences in subjective well-being and their relationships with gender equal-ity. J Happiness Stud 16:1539–1555.

  28. Nezlek JB (2010) Multilevel modeling and cross-cultural research. In: Matsumoto D, van de Vijver AJR (eds) Cross-cultural research methods in psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 299–347

  29. Pinquart M, Sörensen S (2001) Gender differences in self-concept and psychological well-being in old age: a meta-analysis. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 56:P195–P213.

  30. Stone AA, Schwartz JE, Broderick JE, Deaton A (2010) A snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(22):9985–9990.

  31. Tay L, Ng V, Kuykendall L, Diener E (2014) Demographic factors and worker well-being: an empirical review using representative data from the United States and across the world. In: Perrewé PL, Rosen CC, Halbesleben JRB (eds) The role of demographics in occupational stress and well-being. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 235–283

  32. Trivedi JK, Sareen H, Dhyani M (2009) Psychological aspects of widowhood and divorce. Mens Sana Monogr 7(1):37–49.

  33. van der Meer PH (2014) Gender, unemployment and subjective well-being: why being unemployed is worse for men than for women. Soc Indic Res 115:23–44.

  34. West BT, Welch KB, Galecki AT (2014) Linear mixed models: a practical guide using statistical software. Chapman and Hall/CRS, Boca Raton

  35. Zweig JS (2015) Are women happier than men? Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. J Happiness Stud 16:515–541.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Mohsen Joshanloo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material


(DOCX 23.9 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joshanloo, M., Jovanović, V. The relationship between gender and life satisfaction: analysis across demographic groups and global regions. Arch Womens Ment Health (2019).

Download citation


  • Gender
  • Life satisfaction
  • Age
  • Subjective well-being
  • Gallup World Poll