Skip to main content

Adverse life experiences and common mental health problems in pregnancy: a causal pathway analysis

Archives of Women's Mental Health volume 22, pages 75–83 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

Risk factors for antenatal common mental problems include a history of depression, lack of social support and a history of both childhood and adulthood sexual and physical abuse. However, it is less clear whether pregnancy is a time of particular susceptibility to mental disorders due to prior childhood experiences. The aim of the paper was to investigate the potential pathways to antenatal mental health problems. A total of 521 women attending prenatal care attended a clinical interview and answered psychological questionnaires. Univariate analysis, sequential binary logistic regression and structural equation modelling (SEM) were used to analyse the relationships between variables. Having experienced parental maladjustment, maltreatment and serious physical illness in childhood and domestic violence, financial difficulties and serious spousal substance abuse in adulthood significantly predicted antenatal common mental health symptoms. SEM showed that history of depression and adverse experiences in adulthood had mediating effects on the relationship between adverse childhood events and symptoms of antenatal common mental disorders. Adverse childhood experiences are distal risk factors for antenatal common mental health problems, being significant indicators of history of depression and adverse experiences in adulthood. We therefore conclude that pregnancy is not a time of particular susceptibility to common mental health problems as a result of childhood abuse, but rather, these childhood experiences have increased the risk of adulthood trauma and prior mental disorders. Women at risk for antenatal common mental disorders include those with a history of depression, domestic violence, financial difficulties, spousal substance abuse and lack of social support.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  • Alipour Z, Lamyian M, Hajizadeh E (2012) Anxiety and fear of childbirth as predictors of postnatal depression in nulliparous women. Women Birth 25(3):37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez-Segura M, Garcia-Esteve L, Torres A, Plaza A, Imaz ML, Hermida-Barros L, San L, Burtchen N (2014) Are women with a history of abuse more vulnerable to perinatal depressive symptoms? A systematic review. Arch Womens Ment Health 17(5):343–357

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck CT (2001) Predictors of postpartum depression: an update. Nurs Res 50(5):275–285

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett HA, Einarson A, Taddio A, Koren G, Einarson TR (2004) Prevalence of depression during pregnancy: systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 103(4):698–709

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler PM (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 107:238–246

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biaggi A, Conroy S, Pawlby S, Parianteb CM (2016) Identifying the women at risk of antenatal anxiety and depression: a systematic review. J Affect Disord 191:62–77

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon EA, Bonomi AE, Anderson ML, Rivara FP, Thompson RS (2010) Adult health and relationship outcomes among women with abuse experiences during childhood. Violence Vict 25(3):291–305

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canty-Mitchell J, Zimet GD (2000) Psychometric properties of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support in urban adolescents. Am J Community Psychol 28:391–400

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R (1987) Detection of postnatal depression: development of the 10-item Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. Br J Psychiatry 150:782–786

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach LJ, Shavelson RJ (2004) My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educ Psychol Meas 37:827–838

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlem NW, Zimet GD, Walker RR (1991) The multidimensional scale of perceived social support: a confirmation study. J Clin Psychol 47(6):756–761

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis CL, Falah-Hassani K, Shiri R (2017) Prevalence of antenatal and postnatal anxiety: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 210(5):315–323

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiStefano C, Morgan GB (2014) A Comparison of Diagonal Weighted Least Squares Robust Estimation Techniques for Ordinal Data. Struct Equ Model 21(3):425–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard-Gran M, Eskild A, Tambs K, Opjordsmoen S, Samuelsen SO (2001) Review of validation studies of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 104(4):243–249

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavin NI, Gaynes BN, Lohr KN, Meltzer-Brody S, Gartlehner G, Swinson T (2005) Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence. Obstet Gynecol 106(5):1071–1083

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson J, McKenzie-McHarg K, Shakespeare J, Price J (2009) A systematic review of studies validating the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale in antepartum and postpartum women. Acta Psychiatr Scand 119:350–364

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardt J, Rutter M (2004) Validity of adult retrospective reports of adverse childhood experiences: review of the evidence. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 45(2):260–273

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzman C, Eyster J, Tiedje LB, Roman LA, Seagull E, Rahbar MH (2006) A life course perspective on depressive symptoms in mid-pregnancy. Matern Child Health J 10:127–138

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard LM, Oram S, Galley H, Trevillion K, Feder G (2013) Domestic violence and perinatal mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 10(5):e1001452. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001452

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard LM, Molyneaux E, Dennis CL, Rochat T, Stein A, Milgrom J (2014) Non-psychotic mental disorders in the perinatal period. Lancet 384(9956):1775–1788

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6:1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corp (n.d.) Released 2012 IBM SPSS statistics for windows, Version 21.0. IBM Corp, Armonk

  • Kessler RC, McLaughlin KA, Green JF, Gruber MJ, Sampson NA et al (2010) Childhood adversities and adult psychopathology in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. Br J Psychiatry 197(5):378–385

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster CA, Gold KJ, Flynn HA, Yoo H, Marcus SM, Davis MM (2010) Risk factors for depressive symptoms during pregnancy: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(1):5–14

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecrubier Y, Sheehan DV, Weiller E, Amorim P, Bonora I, Sheehan KH, Dunbar GC (1997) The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: reliability and validity according to the CIDI. Eur Psychiatry 12(5):224–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee T, Holditch-Davis D, Shandor Miles M (2007) The influence of maternal and child characteristics and paternal support on interactions of mothers and their medically fragile infants. Res Nurs Health 30:17–30

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF (1995a) Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales, 2nd edn. Psychology Foundation, Sydney ISBN 7334-1423-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH (1995b) The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behav Res Ther 33:335–343

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lydsdottir LB, Howard LM, Olafsdottir H, Thome M, Tyrfingsson P, Sigurdsson JF (2014) The mental health characteristics of pregnant women with depressive symptoms identified by the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. J Clin Psychiatry 75(4):393–398

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom J, Gemmill AW, Bilszta JL, Hayes B, Barnett B, Brooks J, Ericksen J, Ellwood D, Buist A (2008) Antenatal risk factors for postnatal depression: a large prospective study. J Affect Disord 108(1–2):147–157

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray D, Cox JL (1990) Screening for depression during pregnancy with the Edinburgh depression scale (EDDS). J Reprod Infant Psychol 8(2):99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998) Mplus User’s guide, sixth edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2014) Antenatal and postnatal mental health: clinical management and service guidance (NICE Clinical Guideline, 192). Retrieved from https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG192

  • Norhayati MN, Hazlina NH, Asrenee AR, Emilin WM (2015) Magnitude and risk factors for postpartum symptoms: a literature review. J Affect Disord 1(175):34–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plant DT, Barker ED, Waters CS, Pawlby S, Pariante CM (2013) Intergenerational transmission of maltreatment and psychopathology: the role of antenatal depression. Psychol Med 43:519–528

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. URL http://www.R-project.org

  • Rich-Edwards JW, Spiegelman D, Lividoti Hibert EN, Jun H-J, Todd TJ, Kawachi I, Wright RJ (2010) Abuse in childhood and adolescence as a predictor of type 2 diabetes in adult women. Am J Prev Med 39(6):529–536

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson E, Grace S, Wallington T, Stewart DE (2004) Antenatal risk factors for postpartum depression: a synthesis of recent literature. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 26(4):289–295

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson-Blackmore E, Putnam FW, Rubinow DR, Matthieu M, Hunn JE et al (2013) Antecedent trauma exposure and risk of depression in the perinatal period. J Clin Psychiatry 74:942–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano E, Zoccolillo M, Paquette D (2006) Histories of child maltreatment and psychiatric disorder in pregnant adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 45:329–336

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosseel E (2012) Lavaan: R package for structural equation modelling. J Stat Softw 48:1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker RE, Lomax RG (2010) A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. 3rd edn. Psychology Press, New York. ISBN 978-1-84169-891-5

  • Sigurdsson BH (2008) Samanburdur á tveimur stodludum gedgreiningarvidtolum og tveimur sjalfsmatskvordum: MINI, CIDI, PHQ og DASS (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland

  • Tucker LR, Lewis C (1973) A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widom CS, Czaja SJ, Duttonb MA (2008) Childhood victimization and lifetime revictimization. Child Abuse Negl 32(8):785–796

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2013) Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/85240/9789241548595_eng.pdf;jsessionid=E411083CA1C84EA20E3554831034A097?sequence=1

  • Wosu AC, Gelaye B, Williams MA (2015) History of childhood sexual abuse and risk of prenatal and postpartum depression or depressive symptoms: an epidemiologic review. Arch Womens Ment Health 8(5):659–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Y, Cui Y, Li J (2015) Prevalence and predictors of antenatal depressive symptoms among Chinese women in their third trimester: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Psychiatry 15:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0452-7

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK (1988) The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess 52:30–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimet GD, Powell SS, Farley GK, Werkman S, Berkoff KA (1990) Psychometric characteristics of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess 55:610–617

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Primary Health Care of Reykjavik, the Capital area of Iceland, the Primary Health Care of Akureyri and the Perinatal Service of Landspitali-The National University Hospital of Iceland for their co-operation. We also thank the following research assistants, Petur I. Petursson (BS), Thorbjorg Sveinsdottir (MA) and Maria H. Nikulasdottir (MA), psychologist Petur Tyrfingsson (MA), midwife Sigridur S. Jonsdottir (MS) and nurse Sigridur B. Sigurdardottir (BS), who contributed to the study. Finally, we like to thank all the women who participated in the study.

Funding

This work was supported by the The Icelandic Centre for Research (RANNIS) [50427021, 50427022, 50427023, 100740001]; The University of Iceland Research Fund [grant numbers not available]; The LSH-University Hospital Research Fund [grant numbers not available] and the Wyeth Research Fund [grant number not available]. These grants had no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication. Louise Howard is supported by the National Institute for Health Research South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust specialist Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health. All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland

    Linda Bara Lydsdottir, Thora Steingrimsdottir & Jon Fridrik Sigurdsson

  2. Department of Psychology, Reykjavik University, Menntavegur 1, 101, Reykjavik, Iceland

    Linda Bara Lydsdottir & Jon Fridrik Sigurdsson

  3. Section of Women’s Mental Health, King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK

    Louise M. Howard

  4. Mental Health Services, Landspitali–The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland

    Halldora Olafsdottir, Hjalti Einarsson & Jon Fridrik Sigurdsson

  5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Landspitali–The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland

    Thora Steingrimsdottir

Authors
  1. Linda Bara Lydsdottir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Louise M. Howard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Halldora Olafsdottir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hjalti Einarsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Thora Steingrimsdottir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jon Fridrik Sigurdsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Linda Bara Lydsdottir, Halldora Olafsdottir and Jon Fridrik Sigurdsson designed the study and wrote the protocol. Linda Bara Lydsdottir, Hjalti Einarsson and Halldora Olafsdottir contributed in acquisition of data. Linda Bara Lydsdottir, Louise Howard, Jon Fridrik Sigurdsson and Thora Steingrimsdottir contributed to the interpretation of data. Linda Bara Lydsdottir undertook the statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript. This manuscript has not been published and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Bara Lydsdottir.

Ethics declarations

Ethics

Approval for the study was received from the Icelandic National Bioethics Committee (ref. no. 05-107-S1) and the Icelandic Data Protection Authority (ref. no. S2589). When pregnant women attended the antenatal clinics at the beginning of their pregnancy (weeks 12–16), they received information about the study from the midwives, who also invited them to participate. If the women agreed to participate they signed an informed consent. Parental consent was required for women under the age of 18. If the women were in need of psychiatric treatment, they were referred to appropriate treatment at the Mental Health Services at Landspitali–The National University Hospital of Iceland.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lydsdottir, L.B., Howard, L.M., Olafsdottir, H. et al. Adverse life experiences and common mental health problems in pregnancy: a causal pathway analysis. Arch Womens Ment Health 22, 75–83 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-018-0881-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-018-0881-7

Keywords

  • Common mental health problems
  • Adverse childhood experiences
  • Adverse experiences in adulthood
  • Pregnancy