Abstract
Maternal infanticide, or the murder of a child in the first year of life by its mother, is a subject both compelling and repulsive. The victim is innocent, but the perpetrator may be a victim too. In the USA, mentally ill women who commit infanticide may receive long prison sentences or even the death penalty. England, Canada, Australia, and more than 20 European countries have “infanticide laws,” which provide more humane treatment and psychiatric care for mentally ill mothers who kill. One of the reasons for the sentences in the USA lies in our archaic insanity defense. In addition, the psychiatric community does not recognize perinatal illness as a formal diagnosis. Furthermore, general forensic psychiatrists who testify in the courtroom have little knowledge of perinatal illness. I suggest that it is time to invite psychiatrists and psychologists as clinicians and scientists to partner with our legal representatives in the courtroom in order to determine laws based on psychiatric facts and not conjecture. The voices of perinatal mental health advocates must continue to be heard in all courtrooms of the USA.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association (1968) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 2nd edn. American Psychiatric Press Inc, Washington, DC
American Psychiatric Association (1980) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM3), 3rd edn. American Psychiatric Press Inc, Arlington
American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM3-R), 3rd edn. revised. American Psychiatric Press Inc, Arlington
American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM4), 4th edn. American Psychiatric Press Inc, Arlington
American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM5), 5th edn. American Psychiatric Press Inc, Washington DC
Bergink V, Burgerhout KM, Weigelt K, Pop VJ, de Wit H, Drexhage RC (2013) Immune system dysregulation in first-onset postpartum psychosis. Biol Psychiatry 73(10):1000–1100
Garrick ML (2010) Bloodletting 1854. Am J Psychiatry 167(12):1435–1436
Jones I, Craddock N (2007) Searching for the puerperal trigger: molecular genetic studies of bipolar affective puerperal psychosis. Psychopharmacol Bull 40(2):115–128
Leong B (2008) Revisiting the deific-decree doctrine in Washington state. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 36(1):95–104
Lewandowski KE, Cohen BM, Keshavan MS, Öngür D (2011) Relationship of neurocognitive deficits to diagnosis and symptoms across affective and non-affective psychoses. Schizophr Res 133(1–3):212–217
Oberman M (2004) Mothers who kill: coming to terms with modern American infanticide. DePaul J Health Care L 8(1). Available at: http://via.library.depaul.edu/jhcl/vol8/iss1/3. Accessed 17 June 2018
PA-100-0574 (formerly known as HB1764) was signed by Governor Rauner on January 8th 2018.Jan 8, 2018 Legislation | Postpartum Support - PSI,www.postpartum.net/professionals/legislation/ (Accessed April 2, 2018)
Robertson E, Jones I, Haque S, Holder R, Craddock N (2005) Risk of puerperal and non-puerperal recurrence of illness following bipolar affective puerperal (postpartum) psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 186:258–259
Shapiro DL, Mixon L, Jackson M, Shook J (2015) Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends. Int J Law Psychiatry 42-43:149–153
Sit D, Rothschild A, Wisner K (2006) A review of postpartum psychosis. J Womens Health 15(4):352–368
Spinelli M (2002) Infanticide: Psychosocial and legal perspectives on mothers who kill. American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC
Spinelli M (2004) Maternal infanticide associated with mental illness: prevention and the promise of saved lives. Am J Psychiatry 161(9):1548–1557
Spinelli MG (2016) An infanticide trial: US infanticide laws fall well short of international standards. J Clin Psychiatry 77(11):1546–1547
Wisner KL, Peindl K, Hanusa BH (1994) Symptomatology of affective and psychotic illnesses related to childbearing. J Affect Disord 30(2):77–87
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Author declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
The article does not contain studies with human participants or animals performed by any authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Filicide
Guest Editor: Claudia Klier
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spinelli, M. Infanticide and American criminal justice (1980–2018). Arch Womens Ment Health 22, 173–177 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-018-0873-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-018-0873-7