Skip to main content

Maternal depression research: socioeconomic analysis and density-equalizing mapping of the global research architecture

Archives of Women's Mental Health volume 20, pages 25–37 (2017)Cite this article

Abstract

Maternal depression can be accounted for one of the most common complications during pregnancy and the postpartum period affecting women all over the world. So far, no detailed map of the worldwide maternal depression research architecture has been constructed, which encompasses aspects of research activity, quality, and also socioeconomic features. Using the NewQIS platform, density-equalizing mapping projections, scientometric techniques, and economic benchmarking procedures were applied to evaluate global maternal depression research for the period between 1900 and 2012. In total, 7330 related publications and 3335 international collaborations were identified. The USA was the most active country concerning collaborations and total research activity. In the socioeconomic analysis of research activity in high-income countries, Australia was ranked first with an average of 412.05 maternal depression-related publications per 1000 billion US$ GDP (Q1), followed by the UK (Q1 = 373.51) and Canada (Q1 = 306.32). The group of upper-middle-income countries was led by South Africa (Q1 = 145.67), followed by Turkey (Q1 = 91.8). China authored 11.95 maternal depression-related publications per 1000 billion US$ GDP. The USA had the highest activity of maternal depression research per GDP in billion US$ per capita (Q2 = 60.86). When research activity was related to population size (Q3 = publications per Mio. inhabitants), Australia (Q3 = 26.44) was leading the field, followed by Norway (Q3 = 18.48). Gender analysis revealed a relatively high degree of female scientists involved in this field of research with pronounced differences between single subject areas. In summary, we here present the first picture of the global scientific development in maternal depression research over a period of more than 100 years. The research landscape is clearly dominated by North American and Western European countries, with only minor contribution of Asian or South American countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Christian Scutaru for the establishment of the analysis unit and helpful comments. This study is part of a PhD thesis project (CW).

Authors’ contributions

DB, CW, and DK have made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study, acquisition and interpretation of the data. NS, MB, JJ, and DAG have made substantial contributions to the interpretation of the data. They all have been involved in drafting and revising the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Dörthe Brüggmann & Jenny Jaque

  2. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany

    Dörthe Brüggmann & Frank Louwen

  3. Department of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany

    Dörthe Brüggmann, Christina Wagner, Doris Klingelhöfer, Norman Schöffel, Michael Bendels & David A. Groneberg

Authors
  1. Dörthe Brüggmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christina Wagner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Doris Klingelhöfer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Norman Schöffel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael Bendels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Frank Louwen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jenny Jaque
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. David A. Groneberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doris Klingelhöfer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brüggmann, D., Wagner, C., Klingelhöfer, D. et al. Maternal depression research: socioeconomic analysis and density-equalizing mapping of the global research architecture. Arch Womens Ment Health 20, 25–37 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-016-0669-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-016-0669-6

Keywords

  • Maternal depression
  • Maternal mental health
  • Density-equalizing mapping procedures
  • Socioeconomic analysis