Archives of Women's Mental Health

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 353–361

Coping strategies as psychological risk factor for antenatal anxiety, worries, and depression among Greek women

  • Kleanthi Gourounti
  • Fotios Anagnostopoulos
  • Katerina Lykeridou
Original Article
  • 914 Downloads

Abstract

A range of psychosocial, medical, and demographic variables may influence pregnant women’s psychological status. However the association between coping strategies, anxiety, worries, and depression during pregnancy is a relatively neglected area of research. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the relationship between coping strategies, antenatal anxiety, pregnancy worries, and depressive symptomatology after controlling for the effects of background variables. The study sample consisted of 163 pregnant women, with gestational age ranging from 11 to 26 weeks, attending antenatal screening at a Greek public hospital. Coping strategies were measured with Brief COPE, pregnancy worries were measured with Cambridge Worry Scale (CWS), anxiety was assessed using State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-X version), and depression was measured with Center for Epidemiologic Studies—Depression scale (CES-D). Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated among all study variables, followed by hierarchical multiple linear regression. In the univariate analysis, low annual income, unemployment, conception after an IVF treatment, and a previous history of miscarriage were associated with anxiety, depression, and worries. Additionally, almost all coping strategies (denial, behavioral disengagement, self-blame, self-distraction, substance use, acceptance, positive reframing, active coping, and seeking emotional support) were significantly associated with antenatal anxiety, worries, and depression. Linear regression analysis showed that only previous history of miscarriage, conception after IVF, as well as denial, behavioral disengagement and acceptance coping strategies were significantly related to anxiety, worries and depressive symptomatology. The risk factors found in this study could help clinicians target anxiety and depression screening to high-risk populations of pregnant women. Provision of adequate training for obstetricians and midwives in the detection and management of anxiety and depression among pregnant women should help to decrease the psychological burden during pregnancy.

Keywords

Antenatal anxiety Pregnancy worries Antenatal depression Coping strategies IVF conception 

References

  1. Anderson L, Sundstrom-Poromma I, Wuff M, Astrom M, Bixo M (2004) Implications of antenatal depression and anxiety for obstetric outcome. Obstet Gynecol 104:476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bodecs T, Horvath B, Kovacs L, Diffelne Nemeth M, Sandor J (2009) Prevalence of depression and anxiety on a population based Hungarian sample. Orv Hetil 150(41):1888–1893PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boivin J, Appleton TC, Baetens P et al (2001) Guidelines for counseling in infertility: outline version. Hum Reprod 16(6):1301–1304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breedlove G, Fryzelka D (2011) Depression screening during pregnancy. J Midwifery Womens Health 56(1):18–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carver C (1997) You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: consider the Brief COPE. Int J Behav Med 4(1):92–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carver CS, Pozo C, Harris SD, Noriega V, Scheier MF, Robinson DS, Ketcham AS, Moffat FL Jr, Clark KC (1993) How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: a study of women with early stage breast cancer. J Pers Soc Psychol 65:375–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Faul F, Erdlfelder E, Lang A, Buchner A (2007) G* Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Faisal-Cury A, Menezes R (2007) Prevalence of anxiety and depression during pregnancy in a private setting sample. Arch Womens Ment Health 10:25–32Google Scholar
  9. Faisal-Cury A, Savoia M, Menezes P (2012) Coping style and depressive symptomatology during pregnancy in a private setting sample. Span J Psychol 15(1):295–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Field A (2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Field T, Diego M, Dieter J, Hernandez-Reif M, Schanberg S, Kuhn C, Gonzalez-Quintero V (2004) Prenatal depression effects on the fetus and the newborn. Infant Behav Dev 27:216–229Google Scholar
  12. Folkman S, Moskowitz T (2000) Positive affect and the other side of coping. Am Psychol 55(6):647–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gourounti K, Lykeridou K, Taskou C, Kafetsios K, Sandall J (2011) A survey of worries of pregnant women: Reliability and validity of the Greek version of the Cambridge Worry Scale. Midwifery. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2011.09.004 Google Scholar
  14. Gourounti K, Anagnostopoulos F, Lykeridou K, Griva F, Vaslamatzis G. (2013) Prevalence of women’s worries, anxiety and depression during pregnancy in a public hospital setting in Greece. Clin Experim Obstet Gynecol. Accepted 19 Nov 2012Google Scholar
  15. Green JM, Kafetsios K, Statham HE, Snowden CM (2003) Factor structure, validity and reliability of the Cambridge Worry Scale in a pregnant population. J Health Psychol 8:753–764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Green S (1991) How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis? Multivar Behav Res 26:499–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hammarberg K, Fisher J, Wynter K (2008) Psychological and social aspects of pregnancy, childbirth and early parenting after assisted conception: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 14 5:395–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hellenic Statistical Authority (2006) Annual income for Greek population report. Retrieved January 15, 2007, from http://www.statistics.gr/portal/page/portal/ver-1/ESYE/BUCKET/A0103/Other/A0103_SJO46_TB_4Y_00_2006_03_F_GR.pdf
  19. Hjelmstedt A, Widström A, Wramsby H, Matthiesen A, Collins A (2003) Personality factors and emotional responses to pregnancy among IVF couples in early pregnancy: a comparative study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82(2):152–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huizink AC, Mulder EJH, Robels de Medina P, Visser G, Buitelaar J (2004) Is pregnancy anxiety a distinctive syndrome? Early Hum Dev 79:81–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaaya S, Mbwambo J, Kilonzo G, Van Den Borne H, Leshabari M, Fawzi M, Schaalma H (2010) Socio-economic and partner relationship factors associated with antenatal depressive morbidity among pregnant women in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Tanzan J Health Res 12(1):23–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lancaster C, Gold K, Flynn H, Yoo H, Marcus S, Davis M (2010) Risk factors for depressive symptoms during pregnancy: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(1):5–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lazarus R, Folkman S (1984) Stress, appraisal and coping. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Lazarus R (1999) Stress and emotion. In: Lazarus R (ed) Stress and emotion, a new synthesis. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee A, Chong C, Chiu H, Lam S, Fong D (2007) Prevalence, course, and risk factors for antenatal anxiety and depression. Obstet Gynecol 110:1102–1112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leigh B, Milgrom J (2008) Risk factors for antenatal depression, postnatal depression and parenting stress. BMC Psychiatry 8:24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liakos A, Gianitsi S (1984) The validity and reliability of the revised Greek anxiety scale by Spielberger. Engefalos 21:71–76Google Scholar
  28. Madianos M, Stefanis C (1992) Changes in the prevalence of symptoms of depression and depression across Greece. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 27:211–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McQueeney D, Stanton A, Sigmon S (1997) Efficacy of emotion-focused and problem-focused group therapies for women with fertility problems. J Behavior Med 20(4):313–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Melville J, Gavin A, Guo Y, Fan MY, Katon W (2010) Depressive disorders during pregnancy: prevalence and risk factors in a large urban sample. Obstet Gynecol 116(5):1064–1070PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Monti F, Agostini F, Fagandini P, La Sala G, Blickstein I (2009) Depressive symptoms during late pregnancy and early parenthood following assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 91:851–857PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mohammad K, Gamble J, Creedy D (2011) Prevalence and factors associated with the development of antenatal and postnatal depression among Jordanian women. Midwifery 27:238–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mosack V, Shore E (2006) Screening for depression among pregnant and postpartum women. J Community Health Nurs 23:37–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mukhopadhaya N, Arulkumaran S (2007) Reproductive outcomes after in-vitro fertilization. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19:113–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ormel J, Wohlfarth T (1991) How neuroticism, long-term difficulties, and life situation change influence psychological distress: a longitudinal model. J Pers Soc Psychol 60(5):744–755PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pakenham K, Smith A, Rattan S (2007) Application of a stress and coping model to antenatal depressive symptomatology. Psychol Health Med 12(3):266–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Radloff L (1977) The CES-D Scale: a self report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Measur 1:385–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Roussi P, Vassilaki E (2001) The applicability of the multiaxial model of coping to a Greek population. Anxiety Stress Coping 14:125–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rondó PH, Ferreira RF, Nogueira F, Ribeiro M, Lobert H, Artes R (2003) Maternal psychological stress and distress as predictors of low birth weight, prematurity and intrauterine growth retardation. Eur J Clin Nutr 57:266–272Google Scholar
  40. Stanton A (1991) Cognitive appraisals, coping processes, and adjustment to infertility. In: Stanton AL, Dunkel-Schetter C (eds) Infertility: perspectives from stress and coping research. Plenum, New York, pp 87–108Google Scholar
  41. Spielberger C (1972) Anxiety: current trends in research. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Tabachnic B, Fidell L (2007) Using multivariate analysis. Pearson Education, BostonGoogle Scholar
  43. Terry D, Hynes G (1998) Adjustment to a low-control situation: re-examining the role of coping responses. J Pers Social Psychol 74(4):1078–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Qiao YX, Wang J, Ablat A (2009) The prevalence and related risk factors of anxiety and depression symptoms among Chinese pregnant women in Shanghai. Austr New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol 49:185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kleanthi Gourounti
    • 1
    • 3
  • Fotios Anagnostopoulos
    • 2
  • Katerina Lykeridou
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MidwiferyTEI of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyPanteion UniversityAthensGreece
  3. 3.AthensGreece

Personalised recommendations