Assessing the measurement invariance of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale across immigrant and non-immigrant women in the postpartum period
To assess the measurement invariance of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) 2 months after delivery in 656 English-speaking immigrant and non-immigrant women who had at least one other child under 16 and who gave birth in one of two urban Canadian centers. We also compared levels of depression in these two groups using this scale. Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis showed that configural, metric and partial scalar invariances were present and allowed for meaningful substantive comparisons to be made between immigrants and non-immigrants using linear and logistic regressions on an invariant 15-item version of the scale. We observed a novel 4-factor structure for the CES-D in postpartum women and established a 15-item version of this scale that was invariant across immigrant and non-immigrant groups. This suggests that women conceptualize postpartum depression (PPD) in similar ways using the 15-item version of this scale and that meaningful substantive comparisons can be made using it. Indeed, immigrants manifested higher levels of depressive symptoms than non-immigrants (unstandardized b = 1.34, p = 0.02) and an increased risk of being a potential case of PPD (OR = 2.16, 95%CI 1.10–4.19), even after adjustment for other risk factors. Immigrant and non-immigrant women appear to conceptualize PPD in similar ways using this 15-item version of the CES-D. Immigrants may develop more depressive symptoms and be at increased risk of developing an episode of PPD.
KeywordsDepression Postpartum Immigrants Ethnic groups Measurement invariance Measurement equivalence
Dr. Van Lieshout is supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Fellowship. We thank Dr. John Cairney and Ms. Janna Todd, RN for their helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.
- Arbuckle JL (2011) Amos (Version 19.0). IBM, ArmonkGoogle Scholar
- Byrne BM (2010) Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Jang K, Hwa Kwag K, Chriboga DA (2010) Not saying I am happy does not mean I am not: cultural influences on responses to positive affect items in the CES-D. Psychol Sci 65B:684–690Google Scholar
- Jenkins J (2011) Kids, Families and Places Study. http://kfp.oise.utoronto.ca/. Accessed 20 Mar 2011
- Lee JJ, Kim Kw, Kim TH, Park JH, Lee SB, Park JW, McQuoid DR, Steffens DC (2010) Cross-cultural considerations in administering the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. DOI: 10.1159/000318030.
- Miller TQ, Markides KS, Black SA (1997) The factor structure of the CES-D in two surveys of elderly Mexican Americans. J Gerontology 52B:S259–S269Google Scholar
- SPSS Statistics 19, Release version 19.0 (2011) IBM, ArmonkGoogle Scholar
- Statistics Canada (2008) Census of Canada: profile of census divisions and census subdivisions. E-STAT ed. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/estat/licence-eng.htm. Accessed 2 Feb 2011
- Statistics Canada Income Statistics Division (2006) Low income cut-offs for 2006 and low income measures for 2005. Statistics Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
- Statistics Canada Special Surveys Division. Special surveys. National longitudinal survey of children and youth: user's handbook and microdata guide (1996) Statistics Canada and Human Resources Development Canada. OttawaGoogle Scholar