Quellen
National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel EPUAPaPPPIA. Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Quick Reference Guide 2014 [Available from: https://www.epuap.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/german_quick-reference-guide.pdf.
Mervis JS, Phillips TJ. Pressure ulcers: Pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors, and presentation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81(4):881–90.
Lovegrove J, Ven S, Miles SJ, Fulbrook P. Comparison of pressure injury risk assessment outcomes using a structured assessment tool versus clinical judgement: A systematic review. J Clin Nurs. 2021;01:01.
Moore ZE, Patton D. Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;1:CD006471.
European-Pressure-Ulcer-Advisory-Panel. Prävention und Behandlung von Dekubitus 2019 [Available from: www.epuap.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/qrg-2020-german.pdf.
(DNQP) DNfQidP. Expertenstandard Dekubitusprophylaxe in der Pflege 2. Aktualisierung 2017 [Available from: https://www.dnqp.de/fileadmin/HSOS/Homepages/DNQP/Dateien/Expertenstandards/Dekubitusprophylaxe_in_der_Pflege/Dekubitus_2Akt_Auszug.pdf.
Berlowitz DS, K. Berman, R. Cochran, A.. Prevention of pressure-induced skin and soft tissue injury 2022 [Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/prevention-of-pressure-induced-skin-and-soft-tissue-injury.
Stansby G, Avital L, Jones K, Marsden G. Prevention and management of pressure ulcers in primary and secondary care: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ: British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition). 2014;348:g2592–g.
Fangmeyer M, Ledinger D, Klerings I. Standardisiertes Dekubitus-Assessment versus klinische Beurteilung. Rapid Review. Evidenzbasiertes Informationszentrum für Pflegende; November 2022. DOI:10.48341/wqzm-fs69 2022 [Available from: https://ebninfo.at/Dekubitus_Assessment_vs_klinische_Beurteilung.
Webster J, Coleman K, Mudge A, Marquart L, Gardner G, Stankiewicz M, et al. Pressure ulcers: effectiveness of risk-assessment tools. A randomised controlled trial (the ULCER trial). BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(4):297–306.
Saleh M, Anthony D, Parboteeah S. The impact of pressure ulcer risk assessment on patient outcomes among hospitalised patients. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(13):1923–9.
Bartholomeyczik S, Hunstein D. PositionsPapier. Standardisierte Assessmentinstrumente — Möglichkeiten und Grenzen 2006 [Available from: https://www.epa-cc.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/bartho_hunstein_assessmentinstr._2006pdf.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neubauer, C. Standardisiertes Dekubitus-Risikoassessments versus klinische Beurteilung — Einfluss auf die Inzidenz von Dekubitus im Krankenhaus. ProCare 28, 50–51 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00735-023-1678-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00735-023-1678-5