Abstract
Spray systems present unique challenges for fluid mechanics research due to their complex dynamics. Non-optical techniques such as synchrotron X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are promising measurement avenues for non-invasive studies of opaque or enclosed sprays. Previous MRI studies of sprays employed sophisticated pulse sequences possible only with an MRI scanner. In this work, we explore the potential of simple bulk NMR techniques, pulsed-field-gradient (PFG), time-of-fight (TOF), and dynamic magnetic resonance scattering to investigate spray dynamics in three distinct regions. A variable recovery delay was employed to filter signal contributions based on velocity. The PFG measurements of mechanical dispersion are the first of their kind to our knowledge, yielding dispersion coefficients in the range of 10–4–10–3 m2/s. Velocity measurements successfully detected velocities surpassing 30 m/s near the nozzle, with the flow slowing down to several m/s downstream. These techniques show potential for investigating spray dynamics and simple gradient requirements making them suitable for portable NMR applications and in situ measurements.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
T.D. Fansler, S.E. Parrish, Spray measurement technology: a review. Meas. Sci. Technol. 26(1), 012002 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/26/1/012002
A. Kastengren, C.F. Powell, Synchrotron X-ray techniques for fluid dynamics. Exp. Fluids 55(3), 1686 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-014-1686-8
C.F. Powell, Y. Yue, R. Poola, J. Wang, Time-resolved measurements of supersonic fuel sprays using synchrotron X-rays. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 7(6), 356–360 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1107/S0909049500013431
C.F. Powell, Y. Yue, S. Gupta, A. McPherson, R. Poola, J. Wang, in Development of a Quantitative Measurement of a Diesel Spray Core Using Synchrotron X-rays, Eighth International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Pasadena, CA (2000)
A. Kastengren et al., Measurements of droplet size in shear-driven atomization using ultra-small angle X-ray scattering. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 92, 131–139 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.03.005
A.L. Kastengren, C.F. Powell, Y. Wang, K.-S. Im, J. Wang, X-ray radiography measurements of diesel spray structure at engine-like ambient density. At. Sprays 19(11), 1031–1044 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1615/AtomizSpr.v19.i11.30
S. Ahmadi, A.R. Aguilera, B. MacMillan, I. Mastikhin, Studies of periodic seawater spray icing with unilateral NMR. J. Magn. Reson. 334, 107109 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2021.107109
I. Mastikhin, A. Arbabi, K.M. Bade, Magnetic resonance imaging measurements of a water spray upstream and downstream of a spray nozzle exit orifice. J. Magn. Reson. 266, 8–15 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2016.03.005
I.V. Mastikhin, K.M. Bade, S. Ahmadi, A rapid magnetization preparation for MRI measurements of sprays. J. Magn. Reson. 283, 52–60 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2017.08.011
S.J. Richard, B. Newling, Measuring flow using a permanent magnet with a large constant gradient. Appl. Magn. Reson. 50(5), 627–635 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-018-1107-x
T.M. Osán et al., Fast measurements of average flow velocity by low-field 1H NMR. J. Magn. Reson. 209(2), 116–122 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2010.07.011
E.O. Stejskal, J.E. Tanner, Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J. Chem. Phys. 42(1), 288–292 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1695690
E.O. Stejskal, Use of spin echoes in a pulsed magnetic-field gradient to study anisotropic, restricted diffusion and flow. J. Chem. Phys. 43(10), 3597–3603 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1696526
P.T. Callaghan, Translational dynamics and magnetic resonance: principles of pulsed gradient spin echo NMR. Oxford University Press (2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556984.001.0001
P.T. Callaghan, Y. Xia, Velocity and diffusion imaging in dynamic NMR microscopy. J. Magn. Reson. 1969 91(2), 326–352 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2364(91)90196-Z
S.-I. Han, S. Stapf, B. Blümich, Two-dimensional PFG NMR for encoding correlations of position, velocity, and acceleration in fluid transport. J. Magn. Reson. 146(1), 169–180 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/jmre.2000.2145
V. Herold, T. Kampf, P.M. Jakob, Dynamic magnetic resonance scattering. Commun. Phys. 2(1), 46 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-019-0136-6
P.P. Mitra, P.N. Sen, L.M. Schwartz, P. Le Doussal, Diffusion propagator as a probe of the structure of porous media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68(24), 3555–3558 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3555
E. Özarslan et al., Mean apparent propagator (MAP) MRI: a novel diffusion imaging method for mapping tissue microstructure. Neuroimage 78, 16–32 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.016
E. Fukushima, nuclear magnetic resonance as a tool to study flow. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 31(1), 95–123 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.31.1.95
R. Cerbino, V. Trappe, Differential dynamic microscopy: probing wave vector dependent dynamics with a microscope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(18), 188102 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.188102
Y. Huang, V. Yang, Effect of swirl on combustion dynamics in a lean-premixed swirl-stabilized combustor. Proc. Combust. Inst. 30(2), 1775–1782 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.237
S. Sharma, K. Ghate, T. Sundararajan, S. Sahu, Effects of air swirler geometry on air and spray droplet interactions in a spray chamber. Adv. Mech. Eng. 11(5), 168781401985097 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814019850978
I.V. Mastikhin, B.J. Balcom, P.J. Prado, C.B. Kennedy, SPRITE MRI with prepared magnetization and centric k-space sampling. J. Magn. Reson. 136(2), 159–168 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1006/jmre.1998.1612
D.O. Kuethe, A. McBride, S.A. Altobelli, Velocity of mist droplets and suspending gas imaged separately. J. Magn. Reson. 216, 88–93 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2012.01.006
J. Guo, M.M.B. Ross, B. Newling, B.J. Balcom, Non-Newtonian fluid velocity profiles determined with simple magnetic resonance spin echoes. Phys. Rev. Appl. 16(2), L021001 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.L021001
J. Guo, M.M.B. Ross, B. Newling, M. Lawrence, B.J. Balcom, Laminar flow characterization using low-field magnetic resonance techniques. Phys. Fluids 33(10), 103609 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0065986
G. Eidmann, R. Savelsberg, P. Blümler, B. Blümich, The NMR MOUSE, a mobile universal surface explorer. J. Magn. Reson. A 122(1), 104–109 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1006/jmra.1996.0185
P.F. Silva, M.A. Jouzdani, M. Condesso, A.C. Hurtado Rivera, M. Jouda, J.G. Korvink, Net-phase flow NMR for compact applications. J. Magn. Reson. 341, 107233 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2022.107233
B. Blümich, J. Perlo, F. Casanova, Mobile single-sided NMR. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 52(4), 197–269 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnmrs.2007.10.002
J.C. García-Naranjo, I.V. Mastikhin, B.G. Colpitts, B.J. Balcom, A unilateral magnet with an extended constant magnetic field gradient. J. Magn. Reson. 207(2), 337–344 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2010.09.018
E. Schmid, S. Rondeau, T. Rudszuck, H. Nirschl, G. Guthausen, Inline NMR via a dedicated V-shaped sensor. Sensors 23(5), 2388 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/s23052388
K.T. O’Neill, L. Brancato, P.L. Stanwix, E.O. Fridjonsson, M.L. Johns, Two-phase oil/water flow measurement using an Earth’s field nuclear magnetic resonance flow meter. Chem. Eng. Sci. 202, 222–237 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2019.03.018
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. S. Zamiri for help with the fitting software and Mr. Brian Titus for helping to build the experimental setup. We also thank Dr. C. Sipperley for useful discussions, and Dr. K. Bade for providing the high-speed video data and reference information. Funding from Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (RGPIN-2018-04041) is gratefully acknowledged (I.M.)
Funding
All funding for this work was provided by Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (DG RGPIN-2018-04041).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DO and IM wrote the main manuscript. WS provided aid in instrument/sequence preparation and LR-Z provided insight on sample preparation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing financial or personal interests related to this work.
Ethical approval
No animals or human subjects were used in this work.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Osmond, D., Selby, W., Romero-Zeron, L. et al. Bulk NMR Measurements of Spray Dynamics. Appl Magn Reson 54, 1511–1531 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-023-01562-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-023-01562-7