Skip to main content
Log in

Motion Adaptive Wavelet Thresholding for Recovery of Compressively Sampled Static and Dynamic MR Images

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Applied Magnetic Resonance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Iterative shrinkage algorithms like parallel coordinate descent and separable surrogate functional use wavelet thresholding with uniform and empirically selected threshold values to recover the under-sampled magnetic resonance (MR) images. In this paper, an adaptive thresholding parameter, for the recovery of static and dynamic MR images, is derived and used in wavelet domain shrinkage. A modified iterative shrinkage thresholding algorithm based on the derived parameter is also proposed. Simulation results show that adaptive wavelet thresholding yields significantly higher signal-to-noise ratio and correlation than the fixed thresholding value. The algorithm based on the adaptive threshold is experimentally tested for static and dynamic MR images with varying acceleration rates, and it has been shown that it outperforms the fixed thresholding value algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.A. Fessler, IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 27, 81–89 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. E.J. Candes, J.K. Romberg, T. Tao, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 59, 1207–1223 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E.J. Candès, in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (2006), pp. 1433–1452

  4. D.L. Donoho, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52, 1289–1306 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Lustig, D. Donoho, J.M. Pauly, Magn. Reson. Med. 58, 1182–1195 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T.-C. Chang, L. He, T. Fang, in Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Seattle (2006), p. 482

  7. A. Beck, M. Teboulle, SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 2, 183–202 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Zibulevsky, M. Elad, IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 27, 76–88 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Shah, I. Qureshi, Y. Deng, K. Kadir, J. Signal Process. Syst. 2016, 1–12 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Elad, B. Matalon, J. Shtok, M. Zibulevsky, Opt. Eng. Appl. 2007, 670102 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S.G. Chang, B. Yu, M. Vetterli, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing (1997), pp. 604–607

  12. S.G. Chang, B. Yu, M. Vetterli, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 9, 1522–1531 (2000)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. S.G. Chang, B. Yu, M. Vetterli, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 9, 1532–1546 (2000)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Shah, I. Qureshi, J. Proano, Y. Deng, Appl. Magn. Reson. 46, 837–851 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J.A. Shah, I.M. Qureshi, H. Omer, A.A. Khaliq, Y. Deng, Concepts Magn. Reson. Part A 43, 157–165 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S.G. Mallat, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 11, 674–693 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. P. Westerink, J. Biemond, D. Boekee, in International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1988. ICASSP-88 (1988), pp. 757–760

  18. K.P. Pruessmann, M. Weiger, M.B. Scheidegger, P. Boesiger, Magn. Reson. Med. 42, 952–962 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. H. Jung, K. Sung, K.S. Nayak, E.Y. Kim, J.C. Ye, Magn. Reson. Med. 61, 103–116 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Muhammad Bilal or Jawad Ali Shah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bilal, M., Shah, J.A., Qureshi, I.M. et al. Motion Adaptive Wavelet Thresholding for Recovery of Compressively Sampled Static and Dynamic MR Images. Appl Magn Reson 49, 1027–1041 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-018-1022-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-018-1022-1

Navigation