Abstract
Compressed sensing (CS) is an emerging technique for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction from randomly under-sampled k-space data. CS utilizes the reconstruction of MR images in the transform domain using any non-linear recovery algorithm. The missing data in the \(k\)-space are conventionally estimated based on the minimization of the objective function using \(l_{1} - l_{2}\) norms. In this paper, we propose a new CS-MRI approach called tangent-vector-based gradient algorithm for the reconstruction of compressively under-sampled MR images. The proposed method utilizes a unit-norm constraint adaptive algorithm for compressively sampled data. This algorithm has a simple design and has shown good convergence behavior. A comparison between the proposed algorithm and conjugate gradient (CG) is discussed. Quantitative analyses in terms of artifact power, normalized mean square error and peak signal-to-noise ratio are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. In essence, the proposed algorithm improves the minimization of the quadratic cost function by imposing a sparsity inducing \(l_{p}\)-norm constraint. The results show that the proposed algorithm exploits the sparsity in the acquired under-sampled MRI data effectively and exhibits improved reconstruction results both qualitatively and quantitatively as compared to CG.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D.J. Larkman, R.G. Nunes, Phys. Med. Biol. 52(7), R15 (2007)
M. Lustig, D. Donoho, J.M. Pauly, Magn. Reson. Med. 58(6), 1182–1195 (2007)
M.A. Griswold, P.M. Jakob, R.M. Heidemann, M. Nittka, V. Jellus, J. Wang, B. Kiefer, A. Haase, Magn. Reson. Med. 47(6), 1202–1210 (2002)
K.P. Pruessmann, M. Weiger, M.B. Scheidegger, P. Boesiger, Magn. Reson. Med. 42(5), 952–962 (1999)
D. Hoa, Ultra-high field MRI (3 teslas and more). https://www.imaios.com/en/e-Courses/e-MRI/High-field-MRI-3T
H. Omer, Parallel MRI: tools and applications, PhD dissertation, Imperial College London (2012)
H. Omer, R. Dickinson, Concepts Magn. Reson. Part A 38(2), 52–60 (2011)
H. Omer, M. Qureshi, R.J. Dickinson, Concepts Magn. Reson. Part A 44(2), 67–73 (2015)
D.L. Donoho, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52(4), 1289 (2006)
M. Lustig, D. Donoho, J.M. Pauly, Magn. Reson. Med. 58(6), 1182–1195 (2007)
M. Uecker, P. Lai, M.J. Murphy, P. Virtue, M. Elad, J.M. Pauly, M. Lustig, Magn. Reson. Med. 71(3), 990–1001 (2014)
A. Beck, M. Teboulle, SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 2(1), 183–202 (2009)
M.L. Chu, H.C. Chang, H.W. Chung, T.K. Truong, M.R. Bashir, N.K. Chen, Magn. Reson. Med. 74(5), 1336–1348 (2015)
X. Yang, R. Hofmann, R. Dapp, T. van de Kamp, T.D.S. Rolo, X. Xiao, J. Moosmann, J. Kashef, R. Stotzka, Opt. Express 23(5), 5368–5387 (2015)
T. Goldstein, S. Osher, SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 2(2), 323–343 (2009)
Z. Qin, D. Goldfarb, S. Ma, Optim. Methods Softw. 30(3), 594–615 (2015)
Y.C. Eldar, G. Kutyniok, Compressed Sensing: Theory and Applications (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2012)
A. Florescu, E. Chouzenoux, J.C. Pesquet, P. Ciuciu, S. Ciochina, Signal Process. 103, 285–295 (2014)
M. Zibulevsky, M. Elad, IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 27(3), 76–88 (2010)
S.C. Douglas, S.-I. Amari, S.-Y. Kung, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 48(6), 1843–1847 (2000)
M. Elad, B. Matalon, J. Shtok, M. Zibulevsky, in Optical Engineering + Applications (International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2007), pp. 670102–670102
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaleem, M., Qureshi, M. & Omer, H. An Adaptive Algorithm for Compressively Sampled MR Image Reconstruction Using Projections onto \(l_{p}\)-Ball. Appl Magn Reson 47, 415–428 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-016-0761-0
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-016-0761-0