Skip to main content
Log in

Advantages of digital phase-sensitive detection for upgrading an obsolete CW EPR spectrometer

  • Published:
Applied Magnetic Resonance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The replacement of the commonly used analog phase-sensitive detection (PSD) by digital PSD for demodulation of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) signals is suggested for upgrading of an out-of-date EPR spectrometer. Connection of the microwave bridge output to a fast analog-digital converter (ADC) eliminates some of the spectrometer’s components: the electronics responsible for analog PSD, ADC for sampling of demodulated signals, and a computer, as well as the usage of some of the spectrometer’s settings. The spectrometer is reduced to a magnet, microwave bridge, and personal computer containing an ADC board. EPR signals digitized for a set of magnetic field positions form a two-dimensional array which is stored in a personal computer. Demodulation and filtering are done numerically to produce a conventional EPR spectrum. In comparison with analog PSD, this numerical approach does not eliminate the out-of-phase component of the signal and the signals at the higher harmonics of the modulation frequency. The details of modernizing the Bruker ER200E SRC EPR spectrometer are discussed to demonstrate these and other advantages of digital demodulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hyde, S.J., Mchaourab, H.S., Camenisch, T.G., Ratke, J.J., Cox, R.W., Froncisz, W.: Rev. Sci. Instrum. 69, 2622–2628 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hyde, J.S., Camenisch, T.G., Ratke, J.J., Strangeway, R.A., Froncisz, W., in: Eaton, S.S., Eaton, G.R., Berliner, L.J. (eds.) Biomedical EPR, part B: Methodologies, Instrumentation, and Dynamics. Biological Magnetic Resonance, vol. 24, p. 199. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pursley, R.H., Salem, G., Devasahayam, N., Subramanian, S., Koscielniak, J., Krishna, M.C., Pohida, T.J.: J. Magn. Reson. 178, 220–227 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith, S.W.: The Scientist and Engineer’s Guide to Digital Signal Processing. California Technical Publishing, San Diego, Calif. (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sergienko, A.B.: Tsifrovaya Obrabotka Signalov. Peter, St.-Petersburg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Poole, C.P.: Electron Spin Resonance: A Comprehensive Treatise on Experimental Techniques. Wiley, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robinson, B.H., Mailer, C., Reese, A.W.: J. Magn. Reson. 138, 199–209 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mailer, C., Robinson, B.H., Benjamin, B.W., Howard, J.H.: Magn. Reson. Med. 49, 1175–1180 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deng, Y., Pandian, R.P., Ahmad, R., Kuppusamy, P., Zweier, J.L.: J. Magn. Reson. 181, 254–261 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoff, A.J.: Advanced EPR: Applications in Biology and Biochemistry. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kandrashkin, Yu.E., van der Est, A.: Appl. Magn. Reson. 31, 105–122 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. P. Tseitlin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tseitlin, M.P., Iyudin, V.S. & Tseitlin, O.A. Advantages of digital phase-sensitive detection for upgrading an obsolete CW EPR spectrometer. Appl Magn Reson 35, 569–580 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-009-0186-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-009-0186-0

Keywords

Navigation