Skip to main content
Log in

ReLEx SMILE – Refraktive Lentikel Extraktion über Kleinschnittinzision

ReLEx: SMILE Refractive Lenticule Extraction: Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

  • themenschwerpunkt
  • Published:
Spektrum der Augenheilkunde Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die excimerlaserbasierte ablative Hornhautchirurgie – sei es die „Advanced Surface Ablation“ oder die „Laser in Situ Keratomileusis“ – dominiert seit Jahrzenten die refraktive Hornhautchirurgie. Inzisionale Verfahren konnten sich bislang nicht durchsetzen. Mit der Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) gibt es nunmehr seit wenigen Jahren ein neues inzisionales Korrekturverfahren, welches das Potential hat, die bisherigen Verhältnisse zu verändern. Der Übersichtsartikel stellt die Vor- und Nachteile der SMILE dar.

Summary

Excimerlaser based refractive corrections of the cornea—as advanced surface ablation techniques or laser in situ keratomileusis—have dominated the market of corneal refractive surgery for decades. Incisional techniques never showed comparable potentials. In recent years small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), an incisional technique of corneal refractive surgery, has shown the potential of changing the balance of power in corneal refractive surgery. This review article describes the advantages and disadvantages of SMILE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Waring GO 3rd, Lynn MJ, McDonnell PJ. Results of the prospective evaluation of radial keratotomy (PERK) study 10 years after surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112(10):1298–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blum M, Kunert KS, Engelbrecht C, Dawczynski J, Sekundo W. Femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx) – Results after 12 months in myopic astigmatism. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2010;227(12):961–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blum M, Kunert K, Schroder M, Sekundo W, Femtosecond lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia: preliminary 6-month results. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;248(7):1019–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sekundo W, Kunert K, Russmann C, et al. First efficacy and safety study of femtosecond lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia: six-month results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(9):1513–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Elsheikh A, Wang D, Brown M, et al. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and their variation with age. Curr Eye Res. 2007;32(1):11–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Randleman JB, Dawson DG, Grossniklaus HE, McCarey BE, Edelhauser HF. Depth-dependent cohesive tensile strength in human donor corneas: implications for refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2008;24(1):85–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dupps WJ Jr, Wilson SE. Biomechanics and wound healing in the cornea. Exp Eye Res. 2006;83(4):709–20.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Randleman JB. Mathematical model to compare the relative tensile strength of the cornea after PRK, LASIK, and small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg. 2013;29(7):454–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang D, Liu M, Chen Y, et al. Differences in the corneal biomechanical changes after SMILE and LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(10):702–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pedersen IB, Bak-Nielsen S, Vestergaard AH, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. Corneal biomechanical properties after LASIK, ReLEx flex, and ReLEx smile by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252(8):1329–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vestergaard AH, Grauslund J, Ivarsen AR, Hjortdal JO. Central corneal sublayer pachymetry and biomechanical properties after refractive femtosecond lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(2):102–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Agca A, Ozgurhan EB, Demirok A, et al. Comparison of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: a prospective fellow eye study. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014;37(2):77–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. Seven-year changes in corneal power and aberrations after PRK or LASIK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(10):6011–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Myung D, Schallhorn S, Manche EE. Pupil size and LASIK: a review. J Refract Surg. 2013;29(11):734–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miao H, He L, Shen Y, et al. Optical quality and intraocular scattering after femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(5):296–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sekundo W, Gertnere J, Bertelmann T, Solomatin I. One-year refractive results, contrast sensitivity, high-order aberrations and complications after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx SMILE). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252(5):837–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Li M, Zhao J, Shen Y, et al. Comparison of dry eye and corneal sensitivity between small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond LASIK for myopia. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):77797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Garcia-Zalisnak D, Nash D, Yeu E. Ocular surface diseases and corneal refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014;25(4):264–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Seiler T. Innovations in refractive laser surgery 2014. Ophthalmologe. 2014;111(6):539–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sekundo W, Kunert KS, Blum M. Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(3):335–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim JR, Hwang HB, Mun SJ, Chung YT, Kim HS. Efficacy, predictability, and safety of small incision lenticule extraction: 6-months prospective cohort study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2014;14:117.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vestergaard AH, Grauslund J, Ivarsen AR, Hjortdal JO. Efficacy, safety, predictability, contrast sensitivity, and aberrations after femtosecond laser lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(3):403–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vestergaard A, Ivarsen AR, Asp S, Hjortdal JO. Small-incision lenticule extraction for moderate to high myopia: predictability, safety, and patient satisfaction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(11):2003–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vogel A, Freidank S, Linz N. Alternatives to femtosecond laser technology: subnanosecond UV pulse and ring foci for creation of LASIK flaps. Ophthalmologe. 2014;111(6):531–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Trost A, Schrodl F, Strohmaier C, et al. A new nanosecond UV laser at 355 nm: early results of corneal flap cutting in a rabbit model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(13):7854–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas C. Kreutzer FEBO.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kreutzer, T., Dirisamer, M. & Priglinger, S. ReLEx SMILE – Refraktive Lentikel Extraktion über Kleinschnittinzision. Spektrum Augenheilkd. 29, 46–49 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00717-015-0254-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00717-015-0254-9

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation