Journal of Economics

, Volume 114, Issue 3, pp 271–290 | Cite as

Privatization in the presence of foreign competition and strategic policies

  • Bouwe R. Dijkstra
  • Anuj Joshua Mathew
  • Arijit Mukherjee
Article

Abstract

Recent evidence shows that developing and transition economies are increasingly privatizing their public firms and also experiencing rapid growth of inward foreign direct investment (FDI). In an international mixed oligopoly with strategic tax/subsidy policies, we analyze the interaction between privatization and FDI. We find that the incentive for FDI increases with privatization. However, the possibility of FDI reduces the degree of privatization. Our paper shows that FDI policies reducing the fixed-cost of undertaking FDI may need to complement the privatization policies to attract FDI and to improve domestic welfare.

Keywords

Privatization Product tax/subsidy Foreign direct investment Trade Privatization 

JEL Classification

F12 F18 F21 L33 

References

  1. Anderson SP, de Palma A, Thisse J-F (1997) Privatization and efficiency in a differentiated industry. Eur Econ Rev 41:1635–1654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baer W (1994) Privatization in Latin America. World Econ 17:509–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bárcena-Ruiz J, Casado-Izaga F (2012) Location of public and private firms under endogenous timing of choices. J Econ 105:129–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barros F (1995) Incentive schemes as strategic variables: an application to a mixed duopoly. Int J Indus Organ 13:373–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beato P, Mas-Colell A (1984) The marginal cost pricing rule as a regulation mechanism in mixed markets. In: Marchand M, Pestieau P, Tulkens H (eds) The performance of public enterprises-concepts and measurement. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 81–100Google Scholar
  6. Bortolotti B, Fantini M, Scarpa C (2002) Why do governments privatize abroad? Int Rev Finance 3:131–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brander J, Spencer B (1985) Export subsidies and international market share rivalry. J Int Econ 18:83–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corneo G, Jeanne O (1994) Oligopole mixte dans un marché commun. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique ENSAE 33:73–90Google Scholar
  9. Cremer H, Marchand M, Thisse J-F (1989) The public firm as an instrument for regulating an oligopolistic market. Oxford Econ Papers 41:283–301Google Scholar
  10. Das S, Roberts MJ, Tybout JR (2007) Market entry costs, producer heterogeneity and export dynamics. Econometrica 75:837–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Fraja G, Delbono F (1989) Alternative strategies of a public enterprise in oligopoly. Oxford Econ Papers 41:302–11Google Scholar
  12. Dijkstra BR, Mathew AJ, Mukherjee A (2012) Privatization in a polluting industry in the presence of foreign competition. Working paper 08/12, Navarra Centre for International DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  13. Fershtman C (1990) The interdependence between ownership status and market structure: the case of privatization. Economica 57:319–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fjell K, Heywood JS (2002) Public stackelberg leadership in a mixed oligopoly with foreign firms. Aust Econ Papers 41:267–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gani A (2005) Foreign direct investment and privatization. USPEC Working Paper, No. 2005/6, Department of Economics, University of The South PacificGoogle Scholar
  16. Greaney TM (2003) Reverse importing and asymmetric trade and FDI: a networks explanation. J Int Econ 61:453–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harris RG, Wiens EG (1980) Government enterprise: an instrument for the internal regulation of industry. Can J Econ 13:125–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jain R, Pal R (2012) Mixed duopoly, cross-ownership and partial privatization. J Econ 107:45–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kapur D, Ramamurti R (2002) Privatization in India: the imperatives and consequences of gradualism. In: Srinivasan TN (ed) India after a decade of economic reforms: retrospect and prospects. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Kellenberg DK (2009) An empirical investigation of the pollution haven effect with strategic environment and trade policy. J Int Econ 78:242–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin MH, Matsumura T (2012) Presence of foreign investors in privatized firms and privatization policy. J Econ 107:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Merlevede B, Schoors K (2005) How to catch foreign fish? FDI and privatization in EU accession countries. Working Paper, No. 785, William Davidson InstituteGoogle Scholar
  23. Matsumura T (1998) Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. J Public Econ 70:473–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Matsumura T, Kanda O (2005) Mixed oligopoly at free entry markets. J Econ 84:27–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matsumura T, Matsushima NN, Ishibashi I (2009) Privatization and entries of foreign enterprises in a differentiated industry. J Econ 98:203–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mukherjee A, Suetrong K (2009) Privatization, strategic foreign direct investment and host-country welfare. Eur Econ Rev 53:775–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pal D, White MD (1998) Mixed oligopoly, privatization, and strategic trade policy. South Econ J 65:264–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rees R (1988) Inefficiency, public enterprise and privatisation. Eur Econ Rev 32:422–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schmidt KM, Schnitzer M (1997) Methods of privatization: auctions, bargaining and give-aways. CEPR Discussion Paper, No 1541Google Scholar
  30. UNCTAD (2000) World Investment Report. United Nations, New York and GenevaGoogle Scholar
  31. UNCTAD (2002) World Investment Report. United Nations, New York and GenevaGoogle Scholar
  32. Vickers J, Yarrow G (1991) Economic perspectives on privatization. J Econ Perspect 5:111–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bouwe R. Dijkstra
    • 1
    • 2
  • Anuj Joshua Mathew
    • 3
    • 4
  • Arijit Mukherjee
    • 2
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.School of Economics and GEPUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  2. 2.CESifoMunichGermany
  3. 3.Analytical Services DirectorateMinistry of JusticeLondonUK
  4. 4.Government Economic Service (GES)LondonUK
  5. 5.CFGELoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK
  6. 6.RCIECity University of Hong KongKowloonHong Kong

Personalised recommendations