Abstract
This paper introduces two forms of interaction between private and public capital in an endogenous growth model in which productive government expenditure takes the form of a stock-variable and public capital is used in part as an input in the production of final output and in part to increase its own supply. While the first form of interaction involves the stocks of the two capital-goods and takes place within the final output sector through the specification of the aggregate production function (Cobb–Douglas vs. CES), the second one concerns the rates of investment in the two kinds of capital. The share of productive public expenditure devoted to output production can be either exogenous or endogenous. Our results suggest that when this share is exogenous, along the balanced growth path the optimal growth rate of the economy is a positive function of the degree of complementarity between the two forms of investment. When the share of productive public expenditure devoted to output production is endogenous, the public capital share in GDP becomes, along with the model’s preference parameters, an important determinant of the economy’s long run growth. We also find that the optimal growth rate is an increasing function of the elasticity of substitution between public and private capital inputs in goods production, and is independent of the complementarity/substitutability between the two forms of investment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agenor P-R, Moreno-Dodson B (2006) Public infrastructure and growth: new channels and policy implications. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4064
Aiyar S, Dalgaard C-J (2009) Accounting for productivity: is it OK to assume that the world is Cobb–Douglas?. J Macroecon 31(2): 290–303
Antràs P (2004) Is the U.S. aggregate production function Cobb–Douglas? New estimates of the elasticity of substitution. Contributions Macroecon 4(1):Article 4
Arrow K, Chenery H, Minhas B, Solow R (1961) Capital-labor substitution and economic efficiency. Rev Econ Stat 43(3): 225–250
Arrow K, Kurz M (1970) Optimal growth with irreversible investment in a Ramsey model. Econometrica 38(2): 331–344
Aschauer D (1989) Does public capital crowd out private capital?. J Monet Econ 24(2): 171–188
Atukeren E (2005) Interactions between public and private investment: evidence from developing countries. Kyklos 58(5): 307–330
Barro RJ (1990) Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. J Political Econ 98(5): S103–S125
Barro RJ, Barro RJ (2004) Economic growth, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge
Baxter M, King RG (1993) Fiscal policy in general equilibrium. Am Econ Rev 83(3): 315–334
Benos N (2009) Fiscal policy and economic growth: empirical evidence from EU countries. unpublished manuscript University of Ioannina, mimeo (September)
Bentolila S, Saint-Paul G (2003) Explaining movements in the labor share. Contributions Macroecon 3(1):Article 9
Blanchard O (1997) The medium run. Brookings Papers Econ Act 2: 89–158
Chirinko R (2008) Sigma: the long and short of it. J Macroecon 20(2): 671–686
Cohen JP, Paul CJM (2004) Public infrastructure investment, interstate spatial spillovers and manufacturing costs. Rev Econ Stat 86(2): 551–560
de La Grandville O (1989) In quest of the Slutsky diamond. Am Econ Rev 79(3): 468–481
Devarajan S, Swaroop V, Zou H-F (1996) The composition of public expenditure and economic growth. J Monet Econ 37(2): 313–344
Duffy J, Papageorgiou C (2000) A cross-country empirical investigation of the aggregate production function specification. J Econ Growth 5(1): 87–120
Erden L, Holcombe RG (2005) The effects of public investment on private investment in developing economies. Public Finance Rev 33(5): 575–602
Erenburg SJ, Wohar ME (1995) Public and private investment: are there causal linkages?. J Macroecon 17(1): 1–30
Futagami K, Morita Y, Shibata A (1993) Dynamic analysis of an endogenous growth model with public capital. Scand J Econ 95(4): 607–625
Ghosh S, Gregoriou A (2008) The composition of government spending and growth: Is current or capital spending better?. Oxford Econ Papers 60(3): 484–516
Irmen A, Kuehnel J (2008) Productive government expenditure and economic growth. CESifo Working Paper No. 2314 (May)
Jones C (1995) R&D-based models of economic growth. J Polit Econ 103(4): 759–784
Jones C (2005) Growth and ideas. In: Aghion P, Durlauf S (eds) Handbook of economic growth. Elsevier-North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1063–111
Kalaitzidakis P, Kalyvitis S (2004) On the macroeconomic implications of maintenance in public capital. J Public Econ 88(3–4): 695–712
Klump R, de La Grandville O (2000) Economic growth and the elasticity of substitution: two theorems and some suggestions. Am Econ Rev 90(1): 282–291
Klump R, McAdam P, Willman A (2008) The long-term sucCESs of the neoclassical growth model. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 23(1): 94–114
Klump R, Preissler H (2000) CES production functions and economic growth. Scand J Econ 102(1): 41–56
Miyagiwa K, Papageorgiou C (2003) Elasticity of substitution and growth: normalized CES in the Diamond model. Econ Theory 21(1): 155–165
Mulligan C, Sala-i-Martin X (1993) Transitional dynamics in two-sector models of endogenous growth. Q J Econ 108(3): 739–773
Munnell AH (1990) Why has productivity growth declined? Productivity and public investment. N Engl Econ Rev 0(0): 3–22
Munnell AH (1991) Is there a shortfall in public capital investment? An overview. N Engl Econ Rev 0(0): 23–35
Munnell AH (1992) Infrastructure investment and economic growth. J Econ Perspect 6(4): 189–198
Ramirez M (2000) The impact of public investment on private investment spending in Latin America: 1980–95. Atl Econ J 28(2): 210–225
Ramirez M, Nazmi N (2003) Public investment and economic growth in Latin America: an empirical test. Rev Dev Econ 7(1): 115–126
Shieh J, Lai C, Chang W (2002) The impact of military burden on long-run growth and welfare. J Dev Econ 68: 443–454
Smetters K (2003) The (interesting) dynamic properties of the neoclassical growth model with CES production. Rev Econ Dyn 6(3): 697–707
Turnovsky SJ (1997) Fiscal policy in a growing economy with public capital. Macroecon Dyn 1(3): 615–639
Turnovsky SJ (2002) Intertemporal and intratemporal substitution, and the speed of convergence in the neoclassical growth model. J Econ Dyn Control 26(9–10): 1765–1785
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
The Below is the Electronic Supplementary Material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bucci, A., Del Bo, C. On the interaction between public and private capital in economic growth. J Econ 106, 133–152 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-011-0239-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-011-0239-3