Skip to main content
Log in

Product liability and the virtues of asymmetric information

  • Published:
Journal of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes a two-period setup in which firms differ with respect to costs of care and may use care-taking to signal type to consumers, who are able to observe precaution taken only ex post. Applying the refinement of the intuitive criterion to the concept of the perfect Bayesian equilibrium, we establish a unique separating equilibrium for every share of harm borne by firms. For low levels of victim compensation, we show that (i) firms choose weakly higher care in a setting in which customers do not know the firms’ type than in a setting in which they do, and (ii) the deviation in precaution taken due to asymmetric information on firm type is welfare-improving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagwell K, Riordan MH (1991) High and declining prices signal product quality. Am Econ Rev 81: 224–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho IK, Kreps DM (1987) Signaling games and stable equilibria. Q J Econ 102: 179–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooter R, Ulen T (2008) Law and economics, 5th edn. Addison Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Daughety A, Reinganum J (1995) Product safety: liability, R & D, and signaling. Am Econ Rev 85: 1187–1206

    Google Scholar 

  • Daughety A, Reinganum J (2008) Products liability, signaling and disclosure. J Inst Theor Econ 164: 106–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endres A, Lüdecke A (1998) Incomplete strict liability: effects on product differentiation and information provision. Int Rev Law Econ 18: 511–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geistfeld MA (2009) Products liability. In: Faure M. (ed) The encyclopedia of law and economics, 2nd edn. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

  • Lipsey RE, Lancaster K (1956) The general theory of second best. Rev Econ Stud 24: 11–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marette S, Bureau J-C, Gozlan E (2000) Product safety provision and consumers’ information. Aust Econ Pap 39: 426–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polinsky AM, Shavell S (2009) The uneasy case for product liability. Harvard John M. Olin Discussion Paper Series No. 647

  • Rasmusen E (2007) Games and information. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavell S (2004) Foundations of economic analysis of law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavell S (2007) Liability for accidents. In: Polinsky AM, Shavell S (eds) Handbook of law and economics, vol 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 139–182

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Visscher L (2009) Tort damages. In: Faure M (ed) The encyclopedia of law and economics, 2nd edn. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

  • Wickelgren A (2006) The inefficiency of contractually-based liability with rational consumers. J Law Econ Organ 22: 168–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Baumann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baumann, F., Friehe, T. Product liability and the virtues of asymmetric information. J Econ 100, 19–32 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-010-0123-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-010-0123-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation