Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Innovation, imitation and multinationalisation in a North–South model: a theoretical note

  • Published:
Journal of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

We consider a dynamic general equilibrium product variety model of international product cycle with endogenous rate of imitation in the South; and find that a policy of strengthening intellectual property rights (IPR) protection in the South lowers the rate of product innovation, rate of multinationalisation and South–North relative wage if multinationalisation [or, foreign direct investment (FDI)] is the channel of production transfer. These results are significantly different from those obtained in the exogenous imitation model of Lai (J Dev Econ 55(1): 133–153, 1998). So a stronger IPR protection policy adopted by the South may not be interpreted as an incentive to encourage Northern FDI in the South and to raise the rate of innovation in the North.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold LG (2002). On the growth effects of North–South trade: the role of product market flexibility. J Int Econ 58(2): 451–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold LG (2003). Growth in stages. Struct Change Econ Dyn 14(1): 55–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass AJ and Saggi K (2002). Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment. J Int Econ 56(2): 387–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass AJ and Wu X (2007). Intellectual property rights and quality improvement. J Dev Econ 82(2): 393–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM and Helpman E (1991a). Quality ladders and product cycles. Q J Econ 106(2): 557–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM and Helpman E (1991b). Endogenous product cycles. Econ J 101(408): 1214–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM and Helpman E (1991c). Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman E (1993). Innovation, imitation and intellectual property rights. Econometrica 61(6): 1247–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai ELC (1998). International intellectual property rights protection and the rate of product innovation. J Dev Econo 55(1): 133–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield E, Schwartz M and Wagner S (1981). Imitation costs and patents: an empirical study. Econ J 91(364): 907–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal D, Gupta MR (2007) Innovation, imitation and intellectual property rights: introducing migration in Helpman’s model. Jpn World Econ (forthcoming)

  • Rivera-Batiz L and Romer P (1991). Economic integration and endogenous growth. Q J Econ 106(2): 531–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka H, Iwaisako T and Futagami K (2007). Dynamic analysis of innovation and international transfer of technology through licensing. J Int Econ 73(1): 189–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debasis Mondal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mondal, D., Gupta, M.R. Innovation, imitation and multinationalisation in a North–South model: a theoretical note. J Econ 94, 31–62 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-007-0306-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-007-0306-y

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation