Skip to main content
Log in

Patent Enforcement, Innovation and Welfare

  • Published:
Journal of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes how the Southern patent enforcement affects the Northern firm's choice of licensing, subsidiary production or exports for serving the Southern market, and the innovation rate in the North and ultimately the welfare in the South. We show that for imperfect patent enforcement, licensing contract leads to more innovation in the North relative to subsidiary or exports. When both subsidiary and exports are very costly options, no patent enforcement in the South is best for the South. However, when either subsidiary operation or exports can be organized cheaply, the Southern government chooses some positive degree of patent enforcement. We also establish that strengthening of patent enforcement in the South may lead to more licensing and less subsidiary operations or exports.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • P. Aghion J. Tirole (1994) ArticleTitleThe Management of Innovation Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 1185–1209 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2118360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. (1962): ‘‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention’’. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, edited by R. Nelson. Princeton University Press, pp. 609–625.

  • J. C. Chin G. M. Grossman (1990) Intellectual Property Rights and North-South Trade R. W. Jones A. O. Krueger (Eds) In The Political Economy of International Trade: Essays in Honor of R. E. Baldwin Basil Blackwell Cambridge, MA 90–107

    Google Scholar 

  • A. V. Deardorff (1992) ArticleTitleWelfare Effects of Global Patent Protection Economica 59 35–51 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2555064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. B. Deolalikar R. E. Evenson (1989) ArticleTitleTechnology Production and Technology Purchase in Indian Industry: An Econometric Analysis Review of Economics and Statistics 71 687–692 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1928113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, A. V. (1980) ``The Origin and Direction of Industrial R&D in India''. Research Policy 9 (September) 74–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Diwan D. Rodrik (1991) ArticleTitlePatents, Appropriate Technology and North-South Trade Journal of International Economics 30 27–47 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-1996(91)90003-O

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. J. Ferrantino (1993) ArticleTitleThe Effects of Intellectual Property Rights on International Trade and Investments Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 129 300–331

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Fosfuri (2000) ArticleTitlePatent Protection, Imitation and the Mode of Technology Transfer International Journal of Industrial Organization 18 1129–1149 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0167-7187(98)00056-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A Glass K Saggi (2002) ArticleTitleIntellectual Property Rights and Foreign Direct Investment Journal of International Economics 56 387–410 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00117-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. M. Grossman E. Helpman (1991) ArticleTitleEndogenous Product Cycles Economic Journal 101 1214–1229 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2234437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Helpman (1993) ArticleTitleInnovation, Imitation and Intellectual Property Rights Econometrica 61 IssueID6 1247–1280 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2951642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. W. Horowitz E. L.-C. Lai (1996) ArticleTitlePatent Length and the Rate of Innovation International Economic Review 37 IssueID4 785–801 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2527311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. H. Hymer (1976) The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Katz (1973) Industrial Growth Royalty Payments and Local Expenditure on Research and Development V. Urquidi R. Thorp (Eds) In Latin America in the International Economy Macmillan London

    Google Scholar 

  • E. L.-C. Lai (1998) ArticleTitleInternational Intellectual Property Rights Protection and the Rate of Product Innovation Journal of Development Economics 55 133–153 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0304-3878(97)00059-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.-Y. Lee E. Mansfield (1996) ArticleTitleIntellectual Property Protection and U.S. Foreign Direct Investment Review of Economics and Statistics 78 IssueID2 181–186 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2109919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Lall S. Mohammad (1983) ArticleTitleMulti-national in Indian Big Business Journal of Development Economics 13 143–57 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0304-3878(83)90056-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Lall (1987) Learning to Industrialize Macmillan London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1994): ‘‘Intellectual Property Protection, Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Transfer’’. International Finance Corporation, Discussion Paper No. 19.

  • J. R. Markusen (2001) ArticleTitleContracts, Intellectual Property Tights, Multinational Investment in Developing Countries Journal of International Economics 53 189–204 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00058-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskus, K. E., Saggi, K., and Puttitanun, T. (2003): ‘‘Patent Rights and International Technology Transfer through Direct Investment and Licensing’’. mimeo: University of Colorado, Boulder.

  • P. M. Romer (1991) Increasing Returns and New Developments in the Theory of Growth W. A. Barnett (Eds) et al. Equilibrium Theory and Applications: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium in Economic Theory and Econometrics Cambridge University Press Cambridge 83–110

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Saggi (1999) ArticleTitleForeign Direct Investment, Licensing, and Incentives for Innovation Review of International Economics 7 IssueID4 699–714 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-9396.00194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper and Row.

  • P. Segerstrom T. C. A. Anant E. Dinopoulos (1990) ArticleTitleA Schumpeterian Model of the Product Life Cycle American Economic Review 80 IssueID5 1077–1091

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, U. B. (2001): ‘‘Patent Protection, Innovation Rate and Welfare’’. Working Paper no. E/215/2001. Delhi: Institute of Economic Growth, University Enclave.

  • Smarzynska, B. (2002): ‘‘Composition of Foreign Direct Investment and Protection of Intellectual Property Rights:’’ Evidence from Transition Economics’’. mimeo, World Bank.

  • P. J. Smith (2001) ArticleTitleHow Do Foreign Patent Rights Effect U.S. Exports, Affiliates Sales and Licenses Journal of International Economics 55 411–439 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00086-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Tirole (1990) The Theory of Industrial Organization MIT Press Cambridge, MA London

    Google Scholar 

  • UNIDO ``Case Studies in the Acquisition of Technology (II)'' (1984): Development and Transfer of Technology Series, No. 14. New York: United Nations.

  • S. Vishwasrao (1994) ArticleTitleIntellectual Property Rights and The Mode of Technology Transfer Journal of Development Economics 44 381–402 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0304-3878(94)90049-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Yang K. E. Maskus (2001) ArticleTitleIntellectual Property Rights and Licensing: An Econometric Investigation Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 137 58–79

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uday Bhanu Sinha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sinha, U.B. Patent Enforcement, Innovation and Welfare. J Econ 88, 211–241 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-006-0192-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-006-0192-8

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation