Abstract
This paper analyzes how the Southern patent enforcement affects the Northern firm's choice of licensing, subsidiary production or exports for serving the Southern market, and the innovation rate in the North and ultimately the welfare in the South. We show that for imperfect patent enforcement, licensing contract leads to more innovation in the North relative to subsidiary or exports. When both subsidiary and exports are very costly options, no patent enforcement in the South is best for the South. However, when either subsidiary operation or exports can be organized cheaply, the Southern government chooses some positive degree of patent enforcement. We also establish that strengthening of patent enforcement in the South may lead to more licensing and less subsidiary operations or exports.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. Aghion J. Tirole (1994) ArticleTitleThe Management of Innovation Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 1185–1209 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2118360
Arrow, K. (1962): ‘‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention’’. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, edited by R. Nelson. Princeton University Press, pp. 609–625.
J. C. Chin G. M. Grossman (1990) Intellectual Property Rights and North-South Trade R. W. Jones A. O. Krueger (Eds) In The Political Economy of International Trade: Essays in Honor of R. E. Baldwin Basil Blackwell Cambridge, MA 90–107
A. V. Deardorff (1992) ArticleTitleWelfare Effects of Global Patent Protection Economica 59 35–51 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2555064
A. B. Deolalikar R. E. Evenson (1989) ArticleTitleTechnology Production and Technology Purchase in Indian Industry: An Econometric Analysis Review of Economics and Statistics 71 687–692 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1928113
Desai, A. V. (1980) ``The Origin and Direction of Industrial R&D in India''. Research Policy 9 (September) 74–96.
I. Diwan D. Rodrik (1991) ArticleTitlePatents, Appropriate Technology and North-South Trade Journal of International Economics 30 27–47 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-1996(91)90003-O
M. J. Ferrantino (1993) ArticleTitleThe Effects of Intellectual Property Rights on International Trade and Investments Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 129 300–331
A. Fosfuri (2000) ArticleTitlePatent Protection, Imitation and the Mode of Technology Transfer International Journal of Industrial Organization 18 1129–1149 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0167-7187(98)00056-3
A Glass K Saggi (2002) ArticleTitleIntellectual Property Rights and Foreign Direct Investment Journal of International Economics 56 387–410 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00117-9
G. M. Grossman E. Helpman (1991) ArticleTitleEndogenous Product Cycles Economic Journal 101 1214–1229 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2234437
E. Helpman (1993) ArticleTitleInnovation, Imitation and Intellectual Property Rights Econometrica 61 IssueID6 1247–1280 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2951642
A. W. Horowitz E. L.-C. Lai (1996) ArticleTitlePatent Length and the Rate of Innovation International Economic Review 37 IssueID4 785–801 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2527311
S. H. Hymer (1976) The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment MIT Press Cambridge, MA
J. M. Katz (1973) Industrial Growth Royalty Payments and Local Expenditure on Research and Development V. Urquidi R. Thorp (Eds) In Latin America in the International Economy Macmillan London
E. L.-C. Lai (1998) ArticleTitleInternational Intellectual Property Rights Protection and the Rate of Product Innovation Journal of Development Economics 55 133–153 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0304-3878(97)00059-X
J.-Y. Lee E. Mansfield (1996) ArticleTitleIntellectual Property Protection and U.S. Foreign Direct Investment Review of Economics and Statistics 78 IssueID2 181–186 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2109919
S. Lall S. Mohammad (1983) ArticleTitleMulti-national in Indian Big Business Journal of Development Economics 13 143–57 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0304-3878(83)90056-1
S. Lall (1987) Learning to Industrialize Macmillan London
Mansfield, E. (1994): ‘‘Intellectual Property Protection, Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Transfer’’. International Finance Corporation, Discussion Paper No. 19.
J. R. Markusen (2001) ArticleTitleContracts, Intellectual Property Tights, Multinational Investment in Developing Countries Journal of International Economics 53 189–204 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00058-1
Maskus, K. E., Saggi, K., and Puttitanun, T. (2003): ‘‘Patent Rights and International Technology Transfer through Direct Investment and Licensing’’. mimeo: University of Colorado, Boulder.
P. M. Romer (1991) Increasing Returns and New Developments in the Theory of Growth W. A. Barnett (Eds) et al. Equilibrium Theory and Applications: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium in Economic Theory and Econometrics Cambridge University Press Cambridge 83–110
K. Saggi (1999) ArticleTitleForeign Direct Investment, Licensing, and Incentives for Innovation Review of International Economics 7 IssueID4 699–714 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-9396.00194
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper and Row.
P. Segerstrom T. C. A. Anant E. Dinopoulos (1990) ArticleTitleA Schumpeterian Model of the Product Life Cycle American Economic Review 80 IssueID5 1077–1091
Sinha, U. B. (2001): ‘‘Patent Protection, Innovation Rate and Welfare’’. Working Paper no. E/215/2001. Delhi: Institute of Economic Growth, University Enclave.
Smarzynska, B. (2002): ‘‘Composition of Foreign Direct Investment and Protection of Intellectual Property Rights:’’ Evidence from Transition Economics’’. mimeo, World Bank.
P. J. Smith (2001) ArticleTitleHow Do Foreign Patent Rights Effect U.S. Exports, Affiliates Sales and Licenses Journal of International Economics 55 411–439 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00086-1
J. Tirole (1990) The Theory of Industrial Organization MIT Press Cambridge, MA London
UNIDO ``Case Studies in the Acquisition of Technology (II)'' (1984): Development and Transfer of Technology Series, No. 14. New York: United Nations.
S. Vishwasrao (1994) ArticleTitleIntellectual Property Rights and The Mode of Technology Transfer Journal of Development Economics 44 381–402 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0304-3878(94)90049-3
G. Yang K. E. Maskus (2001) ArticleTitleIntellectual Property Rights and Licensing: An Econometric Investigation Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 137 58–79
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sinha, U.B. Patent Enforcement, Innovation and Welfare. J Econ 88, 211–241 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-006-0192-8
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-006-0192-8