Skip to main content
Log in

Self-Reporting and Ex Post Asymmetric Information

  • Published:
Journal of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

We consider a model of optimal law enforcement where sanctions are reduced for self-reporting individuals. Violators get private signals about their individual probabilities of apprehension after they committed a crime. Since violators will self-report if and only if the signal is above a specific threshold, the possibility of self-reporting has an option value that leads to a higher crime rate if the authority's effort remains unchanged. We demonstrate that self-reporting nevertheless increases social welfare even under the restriction that the crime rate must not be higher than without self-reporting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received June 15, 2001; revised version received December 19, 2001

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feess, E., Heesen, E. Self-Reporting and Ex Post Asymmetric Information. JEcon 77, 141–153 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-001-0539-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-001-0539-0

Navigation