Protoplasma

, Volume 255, Issue 3, pp 719–731 | Cite as

Cytomixis in plants: facts and doubts

Review

Abstract

The migration of nuclei between plant cells (cytomixis) is a mysterious cellular phenomenon frequently observable in the male meiosis of higher plants. Cytomixis attracts attention because of unknown cellular mechanisms underlying migration of nuclei and its potential evolutionary significance, since the genetic material is transferred between the cells that form pollen. Although cytomixis was discovered over a century ago, the advance in our understanding of this process has been rather insignificant because of methodological difficulties. The data that allowed for a new insight into this phenomenon were obtained by examining the migrating nuclei with electron and confocal laser microscopy, immunostaining, and fluorescence in situ hybridization. As has been shown, the chromatin migrating between cells is surrounded by an undamaged nuclear membrane. Such chromatin does not undergo heterochromatization and contains normal euchromatin markers. The condensation degree of the migrating chromatin corresponds to the current meiotic stage, and normal structures of synaptonemal complex are present in the migrating part of the nucleus. The cells involved in cytomixis lack any detectable morphological and molecular markers of programmed cell death. It has been shown that individual chromosomes and genomes (in the case of allopolyploids) have no predisposition to the migration between cells, i.e., parts of the nucleus are involved in cytomixis in a random manner. However, the fate of migrating chromatin after it has entered the recipient cell is still vague. A huge amount of indirect data suggests that migrating chromatin is incorporated into the nucleus of the recipient cell; nonetheless, the corresponding direct evidences are still absent. No specific markers of cytomictic chromatin have been yet discovered. Thus, the causes and consequences of cytomixis are still disputable. This review briefs the recent data on the relevant issues, describes the classical and modern methodological approaches to analysis of the intercellular migration of nuclei, and discusses the problems in cytomixis research and its prospects.

Keywords

Micronuclei Meiosis Intercellular channels Nuclear migration Unreduced pollen 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research [16-34-60007 mol_a_dk] and Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science under the program “Molecular genetic bases of regulation of genes expression, morphology, differentiation and cell reprogramming” [0324-2016-0003].

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

709_2017_1188_MOESM1_ESM.docx (26 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 26 kb)

References

  1. Aksic MF, Cerovic R, Ercisli S, Jensen M (2016) Microsporogenesis and meiotic abnormalities in different ‘Oblacinska’ sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) clones. Flora Morphol Distrib Funct Ecol. Plants 219:25–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2015.12.009 Google Scholar
  2. Alka AMYK, Bhat TM et al (2012) Induction of polyploid mutant in Linum usitatissimum L. by cytomixis. Golden Res Thoughts 2:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.9780/22315063 Google Scholar
  3. Arnoldy W (1900) Beiträge zur Morphologie der Gymnospermen. IV. Was sind die ‘Keimbläschen’ oder ‘Hofmeisters-Körperchen. In: der Eizelle der Abietineen? Flora 87, pp 194–204Google Scholar
  4. Bala S, Gupta RC (2011) Effect of secondary associations on meiosis, pollen fertility and pollen size in cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) Chrom Bot 6(2):25–28.  https://doi.org/10.3199/iscb.6.25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barton DA, Cantrill LC, Law AMK et al (2014) Chilling to zero degrees disrupts pollen formation but not meiotic microtubule arrays in Triticum aestivum L. Plant Cell Environ 37(12):2781–2794.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pce CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chicheportiche A, Bernardino-Sgherri J, de Massy B, Dutrillaux B (2007) Characterization of Spo11-dependent and independent phospho-H2AX foci during meiotic prophase I in the male mouse. J Cell Sci 120(10):1733–1742.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.004945 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. De Storme N, Mason A (2014) Plant speciation through chromosome instability and ploidy change: cellular mechanisms, molecular factors and evolutionary relevance. Curr Plant Biol 1:10–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2014.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Farooq U, Lovleen, Saggoo MIS (2014) Male meiosis and behaviour of sex chromosomes in different populations of Rumex acetosa L. from the Western Himalayas, India. Plant Syst Evol 300(2):287–294.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-013-0881-z
  9. Feijo JA, Pais MS (1989) Cytomixis in meiosis during the microsporogenesis of Ophrys lutea: an ultrastructural study. Caryologia 42(1):37–48.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.1989.10796951 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferreira K, Torres GA, Carvalho IV, Davide LC (2009) Abnormal meiotic behavior in three species of Crotalaria. Pesqui Agropecuária Bras 44(12):1641–1646.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2009001200012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fuchs J, Schubert I (2012) Chromosomal distribution and functional interpretation of epigenetic histone marks in plants. Plant Cytogenetics:231–253Google Scholar
  12. Fuentes I, Stegemann S, Golczyk H, Karcher D, Bock R (2014) Horizontal genome transfer as an asexual path to the formation of new species. Nature 511(7508):232–235.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13291 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gates RR (1911) Pollen formation in Oenothera gigas. Ann Bot 25:909–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gerdes HH, Bukoreshtliev NV, Barroso JF (2007) Tunneling nanotubes: a new route for the exchange of components between animal cells. FEBS Lett 581(11):2194–2201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2007.03.071 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghaffari SM (2006) Occurrence of diploid and polyploid microspores in Sorghum bicolor (Poaceae) is the result of cytomixis. Afr J Biotech 5:1450–1453Google Scholar
  16. Giorgetti L, Castiglione M, Martini G et al (2007) Methylated DNA sequence extrusion during plant early meiotic prophase. Caryologia 60(3):279–289.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2007.10797949 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goday C, Pigozzi MI (2010) Heterochromatin and histone modifications in the germline-restricted chromosome of the zebra finch undergoing elimination during spermatogenesis. Chromosoma 119(3):325–336.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-010-0260-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffiths N, Jaipargas E, Wozny M et al (2016) Photo-convertible fluorescent proteins as tools for fresh insights on subcellular interactions in plants. J Microsc 263(2):148–157.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12383 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Guan JZ, Wang JJ, Cheng ZH et al (2012) Cytomixis and meiotic abnormalities during microsporogenesis are responsible for male sterility and chromosome variations in Houttuynia cordata. Genet Mol Res 11:121–130 doi: 0.4238/2012.January.17.2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gupta H, Gupta RC, Kumar R, Singhal VK (2017) A profile of chromosome counts, male meiosis and pollen fertility in 45 species of Asteraceae from Parvati Valley in Kullu district, Himachal Pradesh. Caryologia 70(2):128–140.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2017.1299976 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gurdona C, Svab Z, Feng Y et al (2016) Cell-to-cell movement of mitochondria in plants. PNAS 113(12):3395–3400.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518644113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guzicka M, Wozny A (2005) Cytomixis in shoot apex of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] Trees 18(6):722–724.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-004-0331-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. He S, Yan S, Wang P, Zhu W, Wang X, Shen Y, Shao K, Xin H, Li S, Li L (2014) Comparative analysis of genome-wide chromosomal histone modification patterns in maize cultivars and their wild relatives. PLoS One 9(5):e97364.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097364 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. He Y, Wang C, Higgins J et al (2016) MEIOTIC F-BOX is essential for male meiotic DNA double strand break repair in rice. Plant Cell 28(8):1879–1893.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.16.00108 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Hedde PN, Nienhaus GU (2014) Super-resolution localization microscopy with photoactivatable fluorescent marker proteins. Protoplasma 251(2):349–362.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-013-0566-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Houben A, Demidov D, Caperta AD, Karimi R, Agueci F, Vlasenko L (2007) Phosphorylation of histone H3 in plants—a dynamic affair. Biochim Biophys Acta-Gene Struct Expr 1769(5-6):308–315.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbaexp.2007.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Houben A, Demidov D, Rutten T, Scheidtmann KH (2005) Novel phosphorylation of histone H3 at threonine 11 that temporally correlates with condensation of mitotic and meiotic chromosomes in plant cells. Cytogenet Genome Res 109(1-3):148–155.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000082394 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hunter N, Börner GV, Lichten M, Kleckner N (2001) Gamma-H2AX illuminates meiosis. Nat Genet 27(3):236–238.  https://doi.org/10.1038/85781 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kalinka A, Achrem M, Rogalska SM (2010) Cytomixis-like chromosomes/chromatin elimination from pollen mother cells (PMCs) in wheat-rye allopolyploids. Nucleus 53(3):69–83.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13237-010-0002-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kawashima SA, Yamagishi Y, Honda T, Ishiguro K, Watanabe Y (2010) Phosphorylation of H2A by Bub1 prevents chromosomal instability through localizing shugoshin. Science 327(5962):172–177.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180189 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kolczyk J, Tuleja M, Płachno BJ (2015) Histological and cytological analysis of microsporogenesis and microgametogenesis of the invasive species Galinsoga quadriradiata Ruiz & Pav. (Asteraceae). Acta Biol Cracoviensia Ser Bot 57(2):89–97.  https://doi.org/10.1515/abcsb-2015-0018 Google Scholar
  32. Koyanagi M, Brandes RP, Haendeler J, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S (2005) Cell-to-cell connection of endothelial progenitor cells with cardiac myocytes by nanotubes: a novel mechanism for cell fate changes? Circ Res 96(10):1039–1041.  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000168650.23479.0c CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kravets E (2013) Cytomixis and its role in the regulation of plant fertility. Russ J Devel Biol 44(3):113–128.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062360413030028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kravets E (2011) The role of cell selection for pollen grain fertility after treatment of barley sprouts (Hordeum distichum L.) with UV-B irradiation. Acta Biol Slov 54:31–41Google Scholar
  35. Kumar G, Srivastava N (2013) Induced cytomictic variations in pollen mother cells of Sesbania cannabina Poir. J Cent Eur Agric 14(3):19–27.  https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/14.3.1280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kumar P, Singhal V (2016a) Nucleoli migration coupled with cytomixis. Biologia 71(6):651–659.  https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2016-0076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kumar P, Singhal V (2016b) Morphological and ecological adaptations, and cytological studies in Astragalus rhizanthus Royle ex Benth. (Papilionaceae), an endemic to Himalayas. Cytologia 81(2):155–160.  https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.81.155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kumar P, Singhal VK, Kaur D, Kaur S (2010) Cytomixis and associated meiotic abnormalities affecting pollen fertility in Clematis orientalis. Biol Plant 54(1):181–184.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-010-0031-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kumar P, Singhal V, Srivastava S (2017) First detection of cytomixis and its consequences in Thalictrum cultratum Wall. (Ranunculaceae). Cytol Genet 51(5):384–390.  https://doi.org/10.3103/S0095452717050061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kumar S, Jeelani SM, Rani S, Gupta RC, Kumari S (2013) Cytology of five species of subfamily Papaveroideae from the Western Himalayas. Protoplasma 250(1):307–316.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-012-0413-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kuras M, Nowakowska J, Sliwinska E et al (2006) Changes in chromosome structure, mitotic activity and nuclear DNA content from cells of Allium Test induced by bark water extract of Uncaria tomentosa (Willd.) DC. J Ethnopharmacol 107(2):211–221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2006.03.018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Lavia GI, Ortiz AM, Robledo G, Fernández A, Seijo G (2011) Origin of triploid Arachis pintoi (Leguminosae) by autopolyploidy evidenced by FISH and meiotic behaviour. Ann Bot 108(1):103–111.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr108 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Li XF, Song ZQ, Feng DS, Wang HG (2009) Cytomixis in Thinopyrum intermedium, Thinopyrum ponticum and its hybrids with wheat. Cer Res Comm 37(3):353–361.  https://doi.org/10.1556/CRC.37.2009.3.4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lim KY, Matyásek R, Lichtenstein CP, Leitch AR (2000) Molecular cytogenetic analyses and phylogenetic studies in the Nicotiana section Tomentosae. Chromosoma 109(4):245–258.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004120000074 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lone FA, Lone S (2013) Cytomixis – a well known but less understood phenomenon in plants. Int J Recent Sci Res 4:347–352Google Scholar
  46. Malik R, Gupta R, Singh V et al (2017) New chromosome reports in Lamiaceae of Kashmir (Northwest Himalaya), India. Protoplasma 254(2):971–985.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-016-1006-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Mandal A, Datta AK, Gupta S, Paul R, Saha A, Ghosh BK, Bhattacharya A, Iqbal M (2013) Cytomixis—a unique phenomenon in animal and plant. Protoplasma 250(5):985–996.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-013-0493-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Mandal D, Nandi A (2017) Cytomixis with associated chromosomal anomalies and the reproduction of Chlorophytum borivilianum Santapau & R. R Fern Taiwania 62:211–215.  https://doi.org/10.6165/tai.2017.62.211 Google Scholar
  49. Manzanero S, Arana P, Puertas MJ, Houben A (2000) The chromosomal distribution of phosphorylated histone H3 differs between plants and animals at meiosis. Chromosoma 109(5):308–317.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004120000087 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Mursalimov S, Deineko E (2017) Cytomixis in tobacco microsporogenesis: are there any genome parts predisposed to migration? Protoplasma 254(3):1379–1384.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-016-1028-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Mursalimov S, Permyakova N, Deineko E, Houben A, Demidov D (2015) Cytomixis doesn’t induce obvious changes in chromatin modifications and programmed cell death in tobacco male meiocytes. Front Plant Sci 6:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00846 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mursalimov S, Sidorchuk Y, Deineko E (2013a) The role of spherosome-like vesicles in formation of cytomictic channels between tobacco microsporocytes. Biol Plant 57(2):291–297.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-012-0276-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mursalimov S, Sidorchuk Y, Deineko E (2017a) Analysis of cytomixis in tobacco microsporocytes with confocal laser scanning microscopy. Protoplasma 254(1):539–545.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-016-0973-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Mursalimov S, Sidorchuk Y, Demidov D, Meister A, Deineko E (2016) A rise of ploidy level influences the rate of cytomixis in tobacco male meiosis. Protoplasma 253(6):1583–1588.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-015-0907-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Mursalimov S, Zagorskaya A, Deineko E (2017b) Evaluation of DNA damage in tobacco male meiocytes involved in cytomixis using comet assay. Protoplasma.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-017-1144-6
  56. Mursalimov SR, Baiborodin SI, Sidorchuk YV, Shumny VK, Deineko EV (2010) Characteristics of the cytomictic channel formation in Nicotiana tabacum L. pollen mother cells. Cytol Genet 44(1):14–18.  https://doi.org/10.3103/S0095452710010032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mursalimov SR, Deineko EV (2015) How cytomixis can form unreduced gametes in tobacco. Plant Syst Evol 301(4):1293–1297.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-014-1150-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mursalimov SR, Deineko EV (2011) An ultrastructural study of cytomixis in tobacco pollen mother cells. Protoplasma 248(4):717–724.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-010-0234-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Mursalimov SR, Sidorchuk YV, Deineko EV (2013b) New insights into cytomixis: specific cellular features and prevalence in higher plants. Planta 238(3):415–423.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-013-1914-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Negron-Ortiz V (2007) Chromosome numbers, nuclear DNA content, and polyploidy in Consolea (Cactaceae), an endemic cactus of the Caribbean Islands. Am J Bot 94(8):1360–1370.  https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.94.8.1360 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Ogienko A, Karagodin D, Pavlova N et al (2008) Molecular and genetic description of a new hypomorphic mutation of Trithorax-like gene and analysis of its effect on Drosophila melanogaster oogenesis. Russ J Dev Biol 39(2):108–115.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062360408020070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Papini A, Tani G, Di Falco P, Brighigna L (2010) The ultrastructure of the development of Tillandsia (Bromeliaceae) trichome. Flora Morphol Distrib Funct Ecol Plants 205(2):94–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2009.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pécrix Y, Rallo G, Folzer H et al (2011) Polyploidization mechanisms: temperature environment can induce diploid gamete formation in Rosa sp. J Exp Bot 62(10):3587–3597.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err052 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Pierre P, Sousa S (2011) Citomixia em plantas: causas, mecanismos e consequências. Brazilian. J Biosci 9:231–240Google Scholar
  65. Polowick PL, Sawhney VK (1992) Ultrastructural changes in the cell wall, nucleus and cytoplasm of pollen mother cells during meiotic prophase I in Lycopersicon esculentum (Mill.) Protoplasma 169(3-4):139–147.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323613 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Qiu Y, Liao L, Liu S, Mao D, Liu R (2017) Differences on the microsporogenesis and tapetal development of male fertile and cytoplasmic male sterile pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Grana 56(3):215–227.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00173134.2016.1248860 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Reis A, Sousa S, Viccini L (2016) High frequency of cytomixis observed at zygotene in tetraploid Lippia alba. Plant Syst Evol 302(1):121–127.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-015-1249-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ressayre A, Mignot A, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Raquin C (2003) Postmeiotic cytokinesis and pollen aperture number determination in eudicots: effect of the cleavage wall number. Protoplasma 221(3-4):257–268.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-002-0075-y PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Risso-Pascotto C, Pagliarini MS, do Valle CB (2009) Chromosome number and microsporogenesis of two accessions of Brachiaria dura Stapf (Poaceae). Biota Neotrop 9(2):1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032009000200024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rogakou EP, Boon C, Redon C, Bonner WM (1999) Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. J Cell Biol 146(5):905–915.  https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.146.5.905 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Schattat MH, Barton KA, Mathur J (2014) The myth of interconnected plastids and related phenomena. Protoplasma 252(1):359–371.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-014-0666-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Schoenmakers S, Wassenaar E, Laven JSE, Grootegoed JA, Baarends WM (2010) Meiotic silencing and fragmentation of the male germline restricted chromosome in zebra finch. Chromosoma 119(3):311–324.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-010-0258-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Shibata F, Nagaki K, Yokota E, Murata M (2013) Tobacco karyotyping by accurate centromere identification and novel repetitive DNA localization. Chromosom Res 21(4):375–381.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-013-9363-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sidorchuk YV, Deineko EV, Shumny VK (2007a) Peculiarities of cytomixis in pollen mother cells of transgenic tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum L.) with mutant phenotype. Cell Tiss Biol 1(6):570–576.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990519X07060144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sidorchuk YV, Deineko EV, Shumny VK (2007b) Role of microtubular cytoskeleton and callose walls in the manifestation of cytomixis in pollen mother cells of tobacco Nicotiana tabacum L. Cell Tiss Biol 1(6):577–581.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990519X07060156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sidorchuk YV, Novikovskaya AA, Deineko EV (2016) Cytomixis in the cereal (Gramineae) microsporogenesis. Protoplasma 253(2):291–298.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-015-0807-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Silva N, Machado MFPS, Mangolin CA, Pagliarini MS (2006) Microsporogenesis in somaclones of Cereus peruvianus Mill. (Cactaceae). J Plant Sci 1(1):8–13.  https://doi.org/10.3923/jps.2006.8.13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Silva SL, Magalhaes KM, Carvalho R (2017) Karyotype variations in seagrass (Halodule wrightii Ascherson—Cymodoceaceae). Aquat Bot 136:52–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2016.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Singhal VK, Kumar P (2008) Impact of cytomixis on meiosis, pollen viability and pollen size in wild populations of Himalayan poppy (Meconopsis aculeata Royle). J Biosci 33(3):371–380.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-008-0057-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Singhal VK, Rana PK, Kumar P, Kaur D (2011) Persistent occurrence of meiotic abnormalities in a new hexaploid cytotype of Thalictrum foetidum from Indian cold deserts. Biologia 66(3):458–464.  https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-011-0033-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stegemann S, Bock R (2009) Exchange of genetic material between cells in plant tissue grafts. Science (80- ) 324:649–651. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1170397
  82. Stegemann S, Keuthe M, Greiner S, Bock R (2012) Horizontal transfer of chloroplast genomes between plant species. PNAS 109:2434–2438. doi: DOI  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114076109
  83. Tarkowska J (1965) Experimental analysis of the mechanism of cytomixis. I. Cytomixis in vegetative tissues. Acta Soc Bot Pol 34:27–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tarkowska J (1966) Experimental analysis of the mechanism of cytomixis. II Cytomixis in the pollen mother cells of the lily—Lilium candidum L. Acta Soc Bot Pol 35:25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tarkowska J (1973) The nature of cytomixis. Caryologia 25(sup1):151–157.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.1973.10797120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Thyssen G, Svab Z, Maliga P (2012) Cell-to-cell movement of plastids in plants. PNAS 109(7):2439–2443.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114297109 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  87. Tsvetova M, Elkonin L (2013) Cytological investigation of pollen development in Sorghum line with male sterility induced by sodium ascorbate in tissue culture. Am J Plant Sci 4(07):11–18.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2013.47A1002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wang CY, Li X, QF W, Wang X (2006) Cytoplasmic channels and their association with plastids in male meiocytes of tobacco, onion and lily. Cell Biol Int 30(5):406–411.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellbi.2006.01.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Wang XY, Nie XW, Guo GQ, Pan YF, Zheng GC (Kuo Chang (2002) Ultrastructural characterization of the cytoplasmic channel formation between pollen mother cells of David lily. Caryologia 55(2):161–169.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2002.10589272
  90. Wang XY, Yu CH, Li X, et al (2004) Ultrastructural aspects and possible origin of cytoplasmic channels providing intercellular connection in vegetative tissues of anthers Russ J Plant Physiol 51:110–120. doi: 1021–4437/04/5101–0097Google Scholar
  91. Whelan EDP (1974) Discontinuities in the callose wall, intermeiocyte connections, and cytomixis in angiosperm meiocytes. Can J Bot 52(6):1219–1224.  https://doi.org/10.1139/b74-157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wozny M, Schattat M, Mathur N et al (2012) Color recovery after photoconversion of H2B::mEosFP allows detection of increased nuclear DNA content in developing plant cells. Plant Physiol 158(1):95–106.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.187062 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Xiao A, Li H, Shechter D, Ahn SH, Fabrizio l, Erdjument-Bromage H, Ishibe-Murakami S, Wang B, Tempst P, Hofmann K, Patel DJ, Elledge SJ, Allis CD (2009) WSTF regulates the H2A.X DNA damage response via a novel tyrosine kinase activity. Nature 457(7225):57–62.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07668 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Xue Z, Li Y, Zhang L, Shi W, Zhang C, Feng M, Zhang F, Tang D, Yu H, Gu M, Cheng Z (2016) OsMTOPVIB promotes meiotic DNA double-strand break formation in rice. Mol Plant 9(11):1535–1538.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2016.07.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Yu CH, Guo GQ, Nie XW, Zheng GC (2004) Cytochemical localization of pectinase activity in pollen mother cells of tobacco during meiotic prophase and its relation to the formation of secondary plasmodesmata and cytoplasmic channels. Acta Bot Sin 46:1443–1453Google Scholar
  96. Zani BG, Edelman ER (2010) Cellular bridges: routes for intercellular communication and cell migration. Comm Integr Biol 3(3):215–220.  https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.3.3.11659 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Zhang WC, Yan WM, Lou CH (1990) Intercellular movement of protoplasm in vivo in developing endosperm of wheat caryopses. Protoplasma 153(3):193–203.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01354004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Zhou SQ (2003) Viewing the difference between the diploid and the polyploid in the light of the upland cotton aneuploid. Hereditas 138(1):65–72.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1601-5223.2003.01689.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Cytology and GeneticsRussian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations