Skip to main content
Log in

Euler angles and numerical representation of the railroad track geometry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The geometry description plays a central role in many engineering applications and directly influences the quality of the computer simulation results. The geometry of a space curve can be completely defined in terms of two parameters: the horizontal and vertical curvatures, or equivalently, the curve curvature and torsion. In this paper, distinction is made between the track angle and space-curve bank angle, referred to in this paper as the Frenet bank angle. In railroad vehicle systems, the track bank angle measures the track super-elevation required to define a balance speed and achieve a safe vehicle operation. The formulation of the track space-curve differential equations in terms of Euler angles, however, shows the dependence of the Frenet bank angle on two independent parameters, often used as inputs in the definition of the track geometry. This paper develops the general differential equations that govern the track geometry using the Euler angle sequence adopted in practice. It is shown by an example that a curve can be twisted and vertically elevated but not super-elevated while maintaining a constant vertical-development angle. The continuity conditions at the track segment transitions are also examined. As discussed in the paper, imposing curvature continuity does not ensure continuity of the tangent vectors at the curve/spiral intersection. Several curve geometries that include planar and helix curves are used to explain some of the fundamental issues addressed in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pascal, J.P., Sany, J.R.: Dynamics of an isolated railway wheelset with conformal wheel–rail interactions. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 54, 1947–1969 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, Y., El-Sibaie, M., Lee, S.: FRA track quality indices and distribution characteristics. In: AREMA 2004 Annual Conference, Nashville, TN, USA (2004)

  3. Andersson, C., Abrahamsson, T.: Simulation of interaction between a train in general motion and a track. Veh. System Dyn. 38, 433–455 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. True, H.: Does a critical speed for railroad vehicles exist? In: Proceedings of IEEE/ASME Joint Railroad Conference, pp. 125–131 (1994)

  5. Berghuvud, A.: Freight car curving performance in braked conditions. IMechE J. Rail Rapid Transit 216, 23–29 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boocock, D.: The steady-state motion of railway vehicles on curved track. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2 (1969)

  7. De Pater, A.D.: The geometrical contact between track and wheel-set. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 17, 127–140 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elkins, J.A., Gostling, R.J.: A general quasi-static curving theory for railway vehicles. In: Proceedings of 2nd IUTAM Symposium, Vienna, pp. 388–406 (1977)

  9. Endlicher, K.O., Lugner, P.: Computer simulation of the dynamical curving behavior of a railway bogie. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 19, 71–95 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gilchrist, A.O.: The long road to solution of the railway hunting and curving problems. IMechE J. Rail Rapid Transit 212, 219–226 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grassie, S.L.: Dynamic modeling of the track. In: Kalker, J.J., Cannon, D., Orringer, O. (eds.) Rail quality and maintenance for modern railway operation. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hamid, A., Rasmussen, K., Baluja, M., Yang, T-L.: Analytical description of track geometry variations. FRA report no. DOT/FRA/ORD-83/03.1 (1983)

  13. Handoko, Y., Xia, F., Dhanasekar, M.: Effect of asymmetric brake shoe force application on wagon curving performance. Veh. Syst. Dyn. Suppl. 41, 113–122 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kerr, A.D., El-Sibaie, M.A.: On the new equations for the lateral dynamics of rail-tie structure. ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 107, 180–185 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kik, W.: Comparison of the behavior of different wheelset-track models. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 20, 325–339 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Knothe, K.L., Grassie, S.L.: Modeling of railway track and vehicle/track interaction at high frequencies. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 22, 209–262 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Knothe, K., Stichel, S.: Direct covariance analysis for the calculation of creepages and creep-forces for various bogie on straight track with random irregularities. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 23, 237–251 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shabana, A.A., 2021, Mathematical Foundation of Railroad Vehicle Systems, Wiley & Sons (in press)

  19. Shabana, A.A., Zaazaa, K.E., Sugiyama, H.: Railroad Vehicle Dynamics: A Computational Approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Wickens, A.: Fundamentals of Rail Vehicle Dynamics. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rathod, C., Shabana, A.A.: Geometry and differentiability requirements in multibody railroad vehicle dynamic formulations. Nonlinear Dyn. 47(1–3), 249–261 (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Shabana, A.A., Ling, H.: Noncommutativity of finite rotations and definitions of curvature and torsion. ASME J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 14(9) (2019)

  23. Kreyszig, E.: Differential Geometry. Dover Publications, New York (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Do Carmo, M.P.: Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Klauder Jr., L.T., Chrismer, S.M., Elkins, J.: Improved spiral geometry for high-speed rail and predicted vehicle response. Transp. Res. Rec. 1785(1), 41–49 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Levent, A., Sahin, B., Habib, Z.: Spiral Transitions. Appl. Math. J. Chin. Univ. 33, 468–490 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Hedrick, J.K., Arslan, A.V.: Nonlinear analysis of rail vehicle forced lateral response and stability. ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 101, 230–237 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jeambey, J.: Improving high speed stability of freight cars with hydraulic dampers. In: Proceedings of the 1998 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition (Rail Transportation), Anaheim, California (1998)

  29. Matsumoto, A., Sato, A., Ohno, Y., Suda, H., Nishimura, Y., Tanimoto, R., Oka, M.: Compatibility of curving performance and hunting stability of railway bogie. Veh. Syst. Dyn. Suppl. 33, 740–748 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shabana, A.A.: Computational Continuum Mechanics, 3rd edn. Wiley, London (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Johnson, K.L.: Contact Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Kalker, J.J.: Three-Dimensional Elastic Bodies in Rolling Contact. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Klauder, L.T.: Railroad spiral design and performance. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Rail Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, pp. 9–21 (2012)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (Project # 1632302).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed A. Shabana.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Fresnel integrals

The Fresnel integrals S(x) and C(x) are defined by following power-series expansions which converge for all values of the argument x:

$$ \left. {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {S\left( x \right) = \int_{0}^{x} {\sin \left( {t^{2} } \right)} \,{\text{d}}t = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty } {\left( { - 1} \right)^{n} \frac{{x^{4n + 3} }}{{\left( {2n + 1} \right)!\left( {4n + 3} \right)}}} } \hfill \\ {C\left( x \right) = \int_{0}^{x} {\cos \left( {t^{2} } \right)} \,{\text{d}}t = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty } {\left( { - 1} \right)^{n} \frac{{x^{4n + 1} }}{{\left( {2n} \right)!\left( {4n + 1} \right)}}} } \hfill \\ \end{array} } \right\}. $$
(18)

The trace of the parametric plot of Fresnel integrals \( \left[ {C(x),S(x)} \right] \) is called an Euler spiral or a clothoid, whose curvature at any point is proportional to the distance from the origin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ling, H., Shabana, A.A. Euler angles and numerical representation of the railroad track geometry. Acta Mech 232, 3121–3139 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-020-02903-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-020-02903-4

Navigation