Skip to main content
Log in

Damage detection in materials based on strain measurements

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A technique for detecting the occurrence and development of local damage in a material is presented. It is based on experimental strain values measured by a limited number of sensors and the results of numerical simulation of a stress–strain state. The technique is applicable for external loads on a controlled object that vary over time by a constant factor. The occurrence and location of damage are detected by considering changes in the ratios of strain values recorded simultaneously by two sensors. The positions of the sensors are determined using a numerical simulation of the stress–strain state. The technique was experimentally tested on various samples made of a polymer composite material and under various load cases, including cyclic loads. Fiber-optic strain sensors based on Bragg gratings were used to measure the strain. Such sensors can be glued to the surface of a sample or embedded into a polymer composite material during manufacturing. The following samples were tested: a plate with various holes to simulate damage, an L-shaped element with a stress concentration in the rib area, and a plate with a cut-out on one side under an external cyclic load. In the performed experiments, the possibility of damage detection on the basis of the presented technique was shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Staab, G.: Laminar Composites. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adams, D.E.: Health Monitoring of Structural Materials and Components. Wiley, Chichester (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Stepinski, T., Uhl, T., Staszewski, W. (eds.): Advanced Structural Damage Detection: From Theory to Engineering Applications. Wiley (2013)

  4. Verma, S.K., Bhadauria, S.S., Akhtar, S.: Review of nondestructive testing methods for condition monitoring of concrete structures. J. Constr. Eng. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/834572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fan, W., Qiao, P.: Vibration-based damage identification methods: a review and comparative study. Struct. Health Monit 10(1), 83–111 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Asnaashari, E., Sinha, J.K.: Crack detection in structures using deviation from normal distribution of measured vibration responses. J. Sound Vib. 333, 4139–4151 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2014.04.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Quaranta, G., Carboni, B., Lacarbonara, W.: Damage detection by modal curvatures: numerical issues. J. Vib. Control 22, 1913–1927 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546314545528

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Raghavan, A.C., Cesnik, C.E.S.: Review of guided-wave structural health monitoring. Shock. Vib. Digest 39(2), 91–114 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Morassi, A., Vestroni, F.: Dynamic Methods for Damage Detection in Structures. Springer (2008)

  10. Qiao, P., Lestari, W., Shah, M.G., Wang, J.: Dynamics-based damage detection of composite laminated beams using contact and noncontact measurement systems. J. Compos. Mater. 41, 1217–1236 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998306067306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Michaels, J.E.: Detection, localization and characterization of damage in plates with an in situ array of spatially distributed ultrasonic sensors. Smart Mater. Struct. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/17/3/035035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, Z., Shankar, K., Ray, T., Morozov, E.V., Tahtali, M.: Vibration-based inverse algorithms for detection of delamination in composites. Compos. Struct. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Giurgiutiu, V.: Structural health monitoring (SHM) of aerospace composites. In: Polymer Composites in the Aerospace Industry, pp. 491–558. Elsevier (2020)

  14. Li, Y.Y.: Hypersensitivity of strain-based indicators for structural damage identification: a review. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 24, 653–664 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Majumder, M., Gangopadhyay, T.K., Chakraborty, A.K., Dasgupta, K., Bhattacharya, D.K.: Fibre Bragg gratings in structural health monitoring—present status and applications. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 147, 150–164 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2008.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghoshal, A., Ayers, J., Gurvich, M., Urban, M., Bordick, N.: Experimental investigations in embedded sensing of composite components in aerospace vehicles. Compos. B Eng. 71, 52–62 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.10.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sierra-Pérez, J., Torres-Arredondo, M.A., Güemes, A.: Damage and nonlinearities detection in wind turbine blades based on strain field pattern recognition. FBGs, OBR and strain gauges comparison. Compos. Struct. 135, 156–166 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hong, C.Y., Zhang, Y.F., Zhang, M.X., Leung, L.M., Liu, L.Q.: Application of FBG sensors for geotechnical health monitoring, a review of sensor design, implementation methods and packaging techniques. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 244, 184–97 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Matveenko, V.P.P., Kosheleva, N.A.A., Shardakov, I.N.N., Voronkov, A.A.A.: Temperature and strain registration by fibre-optic strain sensor in the polymer composite materials manufacturing. Int. J. Smart Nano Mater. 9, 99–110 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/19475411.2018.1450791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kang, H.-K., Kang, D.-H., Bang, H.-J., Hong, C.-S., Kim, C.-G.: Cure monitoring of composite laminates using fiber optic sensors. Smart Mater. Struct. 11, 279–287 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/11/2/311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Minakuchi, S., Umehara, T., Takagaki, K., Ito, Y., Takeda, N.: Life cycle monitoring and advanced quality assurance of L-shaped composite corner part using embedded fiber-optic sensor. Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 48, 153–161 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wagreich, R.B., Atia, W.A., Singh, H., Sirkis, J.S.: Effects of diametric load on fibre Bragg gratings fabricated in low birefringent fibre. Electron. Lett. 32, 1223 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1049/el:19960806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gafsi, R., El-Sherif, M.A.: Analysis of induced-birefringence effects on fiber Bragg gratings. Opt. Fiber Technol. 6, 299–323 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/ofte.2000.0333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Grassia, L., Iannone, M., Califano, A., D’Amore, A.: Strain based method for monitoring the health state of composite structures. Compos. B Eng. 176, 107253 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Timoshenko, S., Goodier, J.: Theory of Elasticity. McGraw-Hill, New York (1972)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Lurie, A.I., Belyaev, A.: Theory of Elasticity. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Di Sante, R.: Fibre optic sensors for structural health monitoring of aircraft composite structures: recent advances and applications. Sensors 15, 18666–18713 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/s150818666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Luyckx, G., Voet, E., Lammens, N., Degrieck, J.: Strain measurements of composite laminates with embedded fibre Bragg gratings: criticism and opportunities for research. Sensors 11, 384–408 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3390/s110100384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kosheleva, N., Matveenko, V., Serovaev, G., Fedorov, A.: Numerical analysis of the strain values obtained by FBG embedded in a composite material using assumptions about uniaxial stress state of the optical fiber and capillary on the Bragg grating. Frat. ed Integrità Strutt. 13, 177–189 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.49.19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fedorov, A.Y., Kosheleva, N.A., Matveenko, V.P., Serovaev, G.S.: Strain measurement and stress analysis in the vicinity of a fiber Bragg grating sensor embedded in a composite material. Compos. Struct. 239, 111844 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tretyakova, T.V., Dushko, A.N., Strungar, E.M., Zubova, E.M., Lobanov, D.S.: Comprehensive analysis of mechanical behavior and fracture processes of specimens of three-dimensional reinforced carbon fiber in tensile tests. PNRPU Mech. Bull. (2019). https://doi.org/10.15593/perm.mech/2019.1.15

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by Russian Science Foundation (project No. 19-77-30008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalia Kosheleva.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matveenko, V., Kosheleva, N. & Serovaev, G. Damage detection in materials based on strain measurements. Acta Mech 232, 1841–1851 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-020-02830-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-020-02830-4

Navigation