Response to the comment on the paper “Transient response in a thermoelastic half-space solid due to a laser pulse under three theories with memory-dependent derivative, S. Mondal, P. Pal, M. Kanoria, Acta Mech 230, 179–199 (2019)” by A. Pantokratoras.
The authors would like to thank the reviewer for his critical analysis for the above-mentioned paper. Our comments are as follows:
- 1.
The dimension of Q is \(\frac{\mathrm{m}^2}{\mathrm{s}^3}\) and the dimension of \(\dot{Q}\), i.e., \(\frac{\partial Q}{\partial t}\), is \(\frac{\mathrm{m}^2}{\mathrm{s}^4}\).
- 2.
The term \(\epsilon _{2}\) should be corrected as \(\frac{\rho \gamma \kappa ^{3}R_{a}L_{0}\exp \left( -\frac{h}{2\delta } \right) }{Kc_{0}^{2}\left( \lambda +2\mu \right) \delta t_{p}^{2}}\).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kanoria, M. Authors’ response on ACME-D-19-01018. Acta Mech 231, 2087 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-020-02644-4
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-020-02644-4