Advertisement

Acta Mechanica

, Volume 227, Issue 6, pp 1671–1684 | Cite as

Stability of rigid blocks exposed to single-pulse excitation

  • Hrvoje Smoljanovic
  • Zeljana Nikolic
  • Nikolina Zivaljic
  • Ivan BalicEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper proposes a numerical procedure that can predict the minimum duration of a rectangular, half-cycle sine wave, linearly increasing and triangular single-pulse excitation required to overturn the rigid block resting on a moving base. Since the linearization assumption in the derivation of an analytical solution, which has already been used by Housner and other researchers, cannot be valid for a block with various slenderness ratios and dimensions, a derivation of numerical solutions which would be valid for all types of block is necessary. The proposed numerical procedure takes into account the possibility of sliding and uplifting of the block from the base. The numerical algorithm for the proposed numerical procedure in a commercial code C++ is given in the “Appendix.”

Keywords

Ground Acceleration Pulse Excitation Slenderness Ratio Minimum Duration Shake Table Testing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Housner G.W.: The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during Earthquakes. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 53, 403–417 (1963)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yim C.S., Chopra A.K., Penzien J.: Rocking response of rigid blocks to earthquakes. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 8, 565–587 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ishiyama Y.: Motions of rigid bodies and criteria for overturning by earthquake excitations. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 10, 635–650 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Iyengar R.N., Manohar C.S.: Rocking response of rectangular rigid blocks under random noise base excitations. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 26, 885–892 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aslam M., Godden W.G., Scalise D.T.: Earthquake rocking response of rigid bodies. J. Eng. Mech. Div. 106, 377–392 (1980)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Andreaus U., Casini P.: On the rocking-uplifting motion of a rigid block in free and forced motion: influence of sliding and bouncing. Acta Mech. 138, 219–241 (1999)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baratta A., Corbi I., Corbi O.: Towards a seismic worst scenario approach for rocking systems: analytical and experimental set-up for dynamic response. Acta Mech. 224, 691–705 (2013)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smoljanovic H., Balic I., Trogrlic B.: Stability of regular stone walls under in-plane seismic loading. Acta Mech. 226, 1881–1896 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spanos P.D., Koh A.: Rocking of rigid blocks due to harmonic shaking. J. Eng. Mech. 110, 1627–1642 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hogan S.J.: The many steady state responses of rigid block under harmonic forcing. Bull. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 19, 1057–1071 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Corbi I., Rakicevic Z.T.: Shaking table testing for structural analysis. Int. J. Mech. 4, 459–466 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baratta A., Corbi I., Corbi O., Mastorakis N.: Strategies for the protection from structural failures under seismic events. Int. J. Mech. 9, 69–75 (2015)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lenci S., Rega G.: A dynamical systems approach to the overturning of rocking blocks. Chaos Solitons Fractals 28, 527–542 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shenton H.W., Jones N.P.: Base excitation of rigid bodies. II: periodic slide-rock response. J. Eng. Mech. 117, 2307–2328 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tso W.K., Wong C.M.: Steady state rocking response of rigid blocks part 1: analysis. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 18, 89–106 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yim S.C.S., Lin H.: Nonlinear impact and chaotic response of slender rocking objects. J. Eng. Mech. 117, 2079–2100 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hrvoje Smoljanovic
    • 1
  • Zeljana Nikolic
    • 1
  • Nikolina Zivaljic
    • 1
  • Ivan Balic
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and GeodesyUniversity of SplitSplitCroatia

Personalised recommendations