Advertisement

Acta Mechanica

, Volume 225, Issue 7, pp 1843–1865 | Cite as

Elastic wave fields in a half-plane with free-surface relief, tunnels and multiple buried inclusions

  • Sonia Parvanova
  • Petia Dineva
  • George D. ManolisEmail author
Article

Abstract

In this work, we study the elastic wave fields that develop in an isotropic half-plane which contains different types of heterogeneities such as free-surface relief, unlined and lined tunnels, as well as multiple buried inclusions. The half-plane is swept by traveling harmonic waves, namely pressure waves, vertically polarized shear waves and Rayleigh waves, as well as by waves emanating from an embedded source. The computational tool used is the direct boundary element method (BEM) with sub-structuring capabilities. Following development and numerical implementation of the BEM, two stages of work are performed, namely a detailed verification study followed by extensive parametric investigations. These last numerical simulations help determine the dependence of the elastic waves that develop along the surface of the half-plane, as well as of the dynamic stress concentration factors in the different types of buried inclusions, to the following key factors: geometry of the free-surface relief, geometry, depth of burial and separation distance of the inclusions, wavelength to inclusion diameter ratio and dynamic interaction phenomena between the multiple heterogeneities. In closing, the potential of the enhanced BEM formulation to treat dynamic soil-structure-interaction problems with the kind of complexity expected in realistic engineering applications is discussed.

Keywords

Boundary Value Problem Elastic Wave Rayleigh Wave Hoop Stress Embed Line 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Achenbach J.D.: Wave Propagation in Elastic Solids. North Holland, Amsterdam (1973)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alvarez-Rubio S., Sanchez-Sesma F.J., Benito J.J., Alarcon E.: The direct boundary element method: 2D site effects assessment on laterally varying layered media (methodology). Soil Dyn Earthq. Eng. 24, 167–180 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borejko P.: Application of the generalized rays to transient waves in an elastic half-space due to a buried line source. Acta Mech. 67, 79–90 (1987)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cao H., Lee V.W.: Scattering and diffraction of plane P-waves by circular-cylindrical canyons with variable depth-to width ratio. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 9(3), 141–150 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dineva P., Borejko P., Hadjikov L., Ziegler F.: Transient elastic waves in a half-space: comparison of the DBIE method with the method of generalized rays. Acta Mech. 115, 203–211 (1996)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dravinski M., Yu M.C.: The effect of impedance contrast upon surface motion due to scattering of plane harmonic P, SV, and Rayleigh waves by a randomly corrugated elastic inclusion. J. Seismol. 17, 281–295 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ewing W.M., Jardetzky W.S., Press F.: Elastic Waves in Layered Media. McGraw-Hill, New York (1957)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gatmiri B., Arson C., Nguyen K.V.: Seismic site effects by an optimized 2D BE/FE method I. Theory, numerical optimization and application to topographical irregularities. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 28, 632–645 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gatmiri B., Maghoul P., Arson C.: Site-specific spectral response of seismic movement due to geometrical and geotechnical characteristics of sites. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 29, 51–70 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hao L., Lee V.W., Liang J.: Anti-plane (SH) waves diffraction by an underground semi-circular cavity: analytical solution. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 9, 385–396 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kawase H., Aki K.: Time-domain response of a semicircular canyon for incident SV, P and Rayleigh waves calculated by the discrete wavenumber boundary element method. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 78, 1415–1437 (1988)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnson, J.J., (eds.): Soil-Structure-Interaction: The Status of Current Analysis Methods and Research. Research Report NUREG CR-1780, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (1981)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lamb H.: On the propagation of tremors over the surface of an elastic solid. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 203, 1–42 (1904)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee V.W., Cao H.: Diffraction of SV wave by circular canyons of various depths. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 115(9), 2035–2056 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee V.W., Hao L., Liang J.: Diffraction of anti-plane SH waves by a semi-circular cylindrical hill with an inside concentric semi-circular tunnel. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 3(2), 249–262 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liang J., Luo H., Lee V.W.: Diffraction of plane SH waves by a semi-circular cavity in half-space. J. Earth Sci. 23, 5–12 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Luco J.E., Barros C.P.: Dynamic displacements and stresses in the vicinity of a cylindrical cavity embedded in a half-space. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 23, 321–340 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Manolis G.D., Beskos D.E.: Boundary Element Methods in Elastodynamics. Unwin Hyman, London (1988)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moczo P., Bystricky E., Kristek J., Carcione J.M., Bouchon M.: Hybrid modeling of P-SV seismic motion at inhomogeneous viscoelastic topographic structures. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 87(5), 1305–1323 (1997)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pao Y.H., Mow C.C.: Diffraction of Elastic Waves and Dynamic Stress Concentration. Crane Russak, New York (1973)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Parvanova S., Dineva P., Manolis G.D.: BEM modeling of dynamic behavior of a finite plate with different types of multiple inclusions. Acta Mech. 224, 597–618 (2013)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rodriguez-Castellanos A., Sanchez-Sesma F.J., Luzon F., Martin R.: Multiple scattering of elastic waves by subsurface fractures and cavities. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 96(4A), 1359–1374 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sanchez-Sesma F.J., Campillo M.: Topographic effects for incident P, SV and Rayleigh waves. Tectonophysics 218, 113–125 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sanchez-Sesma F.J., Bravo M.A., Herrera I.: Surface motion of topographical irregularities for incident P, SV and Rayleigh waves. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 75, 263–269 (1985)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tadeu A.J.B., Kausel E., Vrettos C.: Scattering of waves by subterranean structure via the boundary element method. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 15(6), 387–397 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wong H.L.: Effect of surface topography on the diffraction of P, SV, and Rayleigh waves. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 72, 1167–1183 (1982)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wong K.C., Shah A.H., Datta S.K.: Diffraction of elastic waves in a half-space. II. Analytical and numerical solutions. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 75, 69–92 (1985)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yang C.: Scattering of plane P-waves by circular-arc canyon topography: high-frequency solution. Earthq. Res. China 24(2), 155–166 (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yu M.C., Dravinski M.: Scattering of plane harmonic P, SV or Rayleigh waves by a completely embedded corrugated cavity. Geophys. J. Int. 178, 479–487 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sonia Parvanova
    • 1
  • Petia Dineva
    • 2
  • George D. Manolis
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy (UACEG)SofiaBulgaria
  2. 2.Institute of MechanicsBulgarian Academy of Sciences (BAS)SofiaBulgaria
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringAristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH)ThessaloníkiGreece

Personalised recommendations