The study of fiber networks is essential in understanding the mechanical properties of many polymeric and biological materials. These systems deform non-affinely, i.e. the local deformation is different than the applied far-field. The degree of non-affinity increases with decreasing scale of observation. Here, we show that this relationship is a power law with a scaling exponent independent of the type of applied load. Preferential fiber orientation influences non-affinity in a significant way: this parameter generally increases upon increasing orientation. However, some components of non-affinity, such as that associated with the normal strain in the direction of the preferential fiber orientation, decrease. In random networks, the nature of the far-field has little influence on the level of non-affinity. This is not the case in oriented networks.
Probability Distribution Function Random Network Segment Length Uniaxial Strain Oriented Network
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Chandran P.L., Barocas V.H.: Affine versus non-affine fibril kinematics in collagen networks: theoretical studies of network behavior. J. Biomech. Eng. 128, 259–270 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang C.W., Cheng X., Sastry A.M., Choi S.B.: Investigation of failure processes in porous battery substrates. Part I. Experimental findings. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 121, 503–513 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostoja-Starzewski M., Stahl D.C.: Random fiber networks and special elastic orthotropy of paper. J. Elast. 60, 131–149 (2000)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroy K., Frey E.: Force–extension relation and plateau modulus for wormlike chains. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 306–39 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu X.F., Dzenis Y.A.: Elasticity of planar fiber networks. J. Appl. Phys. 98, 093501 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narter M.A., Barta S.K., Buchanan D.R.: Micromechanics of three-dimensional fiberwebs: constitutive equations. Proc. R. Soc. A 455, 3543–3563 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head D.A., Levine A.J., MacKintosh F.C.: Distinct regimes of elastic response and deformation modes of cross-linked cytoskeletal and semiflexible polymer networks. Phys. Rev. E 68, 061907 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilhelm J., Frey E.: Elasticity of stiff polymer networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 108103 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onck P.R., Koeman T., van Dillen T., vand der Giessen E.: Alternative explanation of stiffening in cross-linked semiflexible networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 178102 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatami-Marbini H., Picu R.C.: Scaling of nonaffine deformation in random semiflexible fiber networks. Phys. Rev. E 77, 062103 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heussinger C., Frey E.: Stiff polymers, foams, and fiber networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 017802 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiDonna B.A., Lubensky T.C.: Nonaffine correlations in random elastic media. Phys. Rev. E 72, 066619 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langer S.A., Liu A.J.: Nonaffine correlations in random elastic media. J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 8667–8671 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head D.A., MacKintosh F.C., Levine A.J.: Nonuniversality of elastic exponents in random bond-bending networks. Phys. Rev. E 68, 025101 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonforte F., Tanguy A., Wittmer J.P., Barrat J.L.: Continuum limit of amorphous elastic bodies. II. Linear response to a point source force. Phys. Rev. B 70, 014203 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar