Skip to main content
Log in

A facile synthesis, drug-likeness, and in silico molecular docking of certain new azidosulfonamide–chalcones and their in vitro antimicrobial activity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New azidosulfonamide–chalcone derivatives were designed and synthesized. Their structures were elucidated by 1H and 13C NMR spectral analyses, in addition to elemental analyses. The synthesized derivatives were tested for their antimicrobial activity against a wide variety of Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and fungal strains. Three azidosulfonamide–chalcones showed relatively broad activity against tested strains. Two compounds exhibited eminent antibacterial activity toward S. aureus, M. luteus, and S. marcens (better than ampicillin trihydrate). The synthesized compounds exhibited moderate activity against K. pneumonia and a lower ability to inhibit E. coli growth. Among six tested fungal species, the most potent derivatives demonstrated strong activity toward only two of the fungal strains (T. rubrum and G. candidum). Assessment of drug-likeness, bioavailability, and promiscuity indicated that the compounds are viable drug candidates. In silico molecular docking analysis revealed that the synthesized azidosulfonamide–chalcones successfully occupied pterin-binding site of the dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS), implying that the prepared compounds could exert their activity by the inhibition of the microbial DHPS enzyme. These results provided essential information for the prospective design of more effective antimicrobial compounds.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed N, Konduru NK, Owais M (2019) Arab J Chem 12:1879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Payne DJ, Gwynn MN, Holmes DJ, Pompliano DL (2007) Nat Rev Drug Discov 6:29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sivakumar PM, Ganesan S, Veluchamy P, Doble M (2010) Chem Biol Drug Des 76:407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Phetsang W, Blaskovich MA, Butler MS, Huang JX, Zuegg J, Mamidyala SK, Ramu S, Kavanagh AM, Cooper MA (2014) Bioorg Med Chem 22:4490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Butler MS, Blaskovich MA, Cooper MA (2017) J Antibiot 70:3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zha G-F, Wang S-M, Rakesh K, Bukhari S, Manukumar H, Vivek H, Mallesha N, Qin H-L (2019) Eur J Med Chem 162:364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Kardocy A, Mustafa M, Ahmed ER, Mohamady S, Mostafa YA (2019) Med Chem Res 28:2088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghorab MM, Al-Said MS (2012) Arch Pharmacal Res 35:987

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. El-Din MMG, El-Gamal MI, Abdel-Maksoud MS, Yoo KH, Oh C-H (2015) Eur J Med Chem 90:45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghorab MM, Ragab FA, Heiba HI, Agha HM, Nissan YM (2012) Arch Pharmacal Res 35:59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghorab MM, Ismail ZH, Abdalla M, Radwan AA (2013) Arch Pharmacal Res 36:660

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Arshad M (2018) Int J Pharm Sci Res 9:35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lavanya R (2017) Int J Pharm Sci Invent 6:1

    Google Scholar 

  14. Askar F, Aldhalf Y, Jinzeel N (2017) Int J Chem Sci 15:173

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fathalla OA, Zaghary WA, Radwan HH, Awad SM, Mohamed MS (2002) Arch Pharmacal Res 25:258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bahekar SP, Hande SV, Agrawal NR, Chandak HS, Bhoj PS, Goswami K, Reddy M (2016) Eur J Med Chem 124:262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Basanagouda M, Shivashankar K, Kulkarni MV, Rasal VP, Patel H, Mutha SS, Mohite AA (2010) Eur J Med Chem 45:1151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Uddin MJ, Rao PP, Knaus EE (2003) Bioorg Med Chem 11:5273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pinney KG, Mejia MP, Villalobos VM, Rosenquist BE, Pettit GR, Verdier-Pinard P, Hamel E (2000) Bioorg Med Chem 8:2417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Agard NJ, Baskin JM, Prescher JA, Lo A, Bertozzi CR (2006) ACS Chem Biol 1:644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Meyer D, Smeilus T, Pliatsika D, Mousavizadeh F, Giannis A (2017) Bioorg Med Chem 25:6098

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Ostrand R, Jacobsen C, Delahunty A, Stringer C, Noorbehesht R, Ahmed H, Awad AM (2017) Nucleosides. Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 36:181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nasr T, Bondock S, Eid S (2016) J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 31:236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yun M-K, Wu Y, Li Z, Zhao Y, Waddell MB, Ferreira AM, Lee RE, Bashford D, White SW (2012) Science 335:1110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lipinski CA (2000) J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 44:235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ (1997) Adv Drug Deliv Rev 23:3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Daina A, Michielin O, Zoete V (2017) Sci Rep 7:42717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Martin YC (2005) J Med Chem 48:3164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang JJ, Ursu O, Lipinski CA, Sklar LA, Oprea TI, Bologa CG (2016) J Cheminform 8:29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mustafa M, Anwar S, Elgamal F, Ahmed ER, Aly OM (2019) Eur J Med Chem 183:111697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2015) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. In: 25th informational supplement, M100-S25, vol 35, no 3. CLSI, Payne

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaser A. Mostafa.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 3039 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mustafa, M., Mostafa, Y.A. A facile synthesis, drug-likeness, and in silico molecular docking of certain new azidosulfonamide–chalcones and their in vitro antimicrobial activity. Monatsh Chem 151, 417–427 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-020-02568-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-020-02568-8

Keywords

Navigation