Skip to main content
Log in

Foot-and-mouth disease virus strains isolated in Vietnam during 2010-2019: genetic characterization and antigenic relatedness to the Euro SA vaccine

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Virology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foot-and-mouth disease is a highly contagious disease that affects cloven-hoofed animals. It has an important socio-economic impact on the livestock industry because it produces a drastic decrease of productivity. The disease has been successfully eradicated from some regions, including North America and Western Europe, but it is still endemic in developing countries. Agriculture plays an important role in the national economy of Vietnam, to which animal production contributes a great proportion. The concurrent circulation of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) serotypes O, A, and Asia 1 has been detected in recent years, but serotype O remains the most prevalent and is responsible for the highest numbers of outbreaks. Appropriate vaccine strain selection is an important element in the control of FMD and is necessary for the application of vaccination programs in FMD-affected regions. Here, we present updated information about the genetic and antigenic characteristics of circulating strains, collected from endemic outbreaks involving types O and A, between 2010 and 2019. Neutralizing assays showed a good in vitro match between type O strains and the monovalent O1 Campos vaccine strain. High r1 values were obtained (above 0.7) when testing a swine serum pool collected 21 days after vaccination, but the O/VTN/2/2019 strain was an exception. An EPP estimation resulted in a median neutralizing titre of about 1.65 log10, indicating that good protection could be achieved. For type A Asia SEA 97 lineage strains, acceptable individual neutralizing titres were obtained with estimated EPP values over 80% for different combinations of vaccine strains. Taking into account that the r1 value is one tool of a battery of tests that should be considered for estimating the cross-protection of a field strain against a vaccine strain, an in vivo challenge experiment was also performed, yielding a PD50 value of 8.0. The results indicate that South American strains could be potentially used for controlling outbreaks involving these lineages. This study demonstrates the importance of considering strain characteristics when choosing vaccine strains and controls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data is available under request to any of the authors of this manuscript.

References

  1. WOAH (2021). Foot and Mouth Disease Card. https://www.woah.org/app/uploads/2021/09/foot-and-mouth-disease-1.pdf

  2. OIE-FAO (2012). The Global Foot and Mouth Disease Control Strategy. Strengthening Animal Health System through Improved Control of Major Diseases. OIE and FAO editorial, pp43 FAO, Rome, Italy.

  3. Bachrach HL (1968) Foot-and-mouth disease. Annu Rev Microbiol 22:201–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fry EE, Lea SM, Jackson T et al (1999) The structure and function of a foot-and-mouth disease virus-oligosaccharide receptor complex. EMBO J 18(3):543–554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Samuel AR, Knowles NJ (2001) Foot-and-mouth disease type O viruses exhibit genetically and geographically distinct evolutionary lineages (topotypes). J Gen Virol 82:609–621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carrillo C, Tulman ER, Delhon G et al (2005) Comparative genomics of foot-and-mouth disease virus. J Virol 79(10):6487–6504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kitching RP, Knowles NJ, Samuel AR et al (2001) Development of foot and- mouth disease virus strain characterisation–a review. Trop Anim Health Prod 21(3):153–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kitching RP (2005) Global epidemiology and prospects for control of foot-and mouth disease. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 288:133–148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tosh C, Sanyal A, Hemadri D et al (2005) Phylogenetic analysis of serotype A foot-and-mouth disease virus isolated in India between 1977 and 2000. Arch Virol 147(3):493–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Knowles NJ, Samuel AR, Davies PR et al (2005) Pandemic strain of foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype O. Emerg Infect Dis 11(12):1887–1893

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Le VP, Vu TTH, Duong HQ et al (2016) Evolutionary phylodynamics of foot-and-mouth disease virus serotypes O and A circulating in Vietnam. BMC Vet Res 12:269

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Jamal SM, Ferrari G, Ahmed S et al (2011) Molecular characterization of serotype Asia-1 foot-and-mouth disease viruses in Pakistan and Afghanistan; emergence of a new genetic Group and evidence for a novel recombinant virus. Infect Genet Evol 11(8):2049–2062

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kitching P, Hammond J, Jeggo M et al (2007) Global FMD control–is it an option? Vaccine 25(30):5660–5664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. United Nations (2018) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation, the context of the agriculture and the role of family farms United nations. version i8358EN/1/02.18.

  15. Gleeson LJ (2002) A review of the status of foot and mouth disease in South-East Asia and approaches to control and eradication”. Rev Sci Tech 21(3):465–475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Le VP, Nguyen T, Lee KN et al (2010) Molecular characterization of serotype A foot-and-mouth disease viruses circulating in Vietnam in 2009. Vet Microbiol 144(1–2):58–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Le VP, Nguyen T, Park JH et al (2010) Heterogeneity and genetic variations of serotypes O and Asia 1 foot-and-mouth disease viruses isolated in Vietnam. Vet Microbiol 145(3–4):220–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee KN, Nguyen T, Kim SM et al (2011) Direct typing and molecular evolutionary analysis of field samples of foot and-mouth disease virus collected in Viet Nam between 2006 and 2007. Vet Microbiol 147(3–4):244–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Valarcher JF, Knowles NJ, Zakharov V et al (2009) Multiple origins of foot-and mouth disease virus serotype Asia 1 outbreaks, 2003–2007. Emerg Infect Dis 15:1046–1051

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. OIE/FAO Foot-and-Mouth Disease Reference Laboratory Network. Annual Report 2018. https://www.wrlfmd.org/ref-lab-reports#panel-4752.

  21. Galdo Novo S, Malirat V, Maradei ED et al (2017) Antigenic and immunogenic spectrum of Foot-and- Mouth Disease vaccine strain O 1 Campos against representative viruses of topotypes that circulated in Asia over the past decade. Vaccine 35:1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Galdo Novo S, Malirat V, Maradei E et al (2018) Efficacy of a high quality O1 Campos foot-and-mouth disease vaccine upon challenge with a heterologous Korean O Mya98 lineage virus in pigs. Vaccine 36:15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Choi J, Jo HJ, Jung SS, Choi J et al (2021) Evaluation of swine protection with foot-and-mouth disease O 1/Campos and O/Primorsky/2014 vaccines against the O Mya-98 lineage virus from East Asia. Vaccine 39(12):1701–1707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Maradei E, Malirat V, Perez Beascoechea C et al (2013) Characterization of a type O foot-and-mouth disease virus re-emerging in the year 2011 in free areas of the Southern Cone of South America and cross-protection studies with the vaccine strain in use in the region. Vet Microbiol 162:479–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Malirat V, Franca de Barros JJ, Bergmann IE et al (2007) Phylogenetic analysis of foot-and-mouth disease vírus type O re-remerging in free areas of South America. Virus Res 124:22–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M et al (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms”. Mol Biol Evol 35:547–1549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. OIE. World Organisation for Animal Health. Organisation Mondiale de la Santé Animale. (2021) Foot and mouth disease OIE Standards Commission. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals, 9th ed., (Chapter 3.1.8, page 13).

  28. PANAFTOSA (Pan-American Foot-and-Mouth Disease Center) (1994) ‘Subproyecto para la correlación de las técnicas de control de potencia de las vacunas contra la Fiebre Aftosa en los países de la Cuenca del Río de la Plata, PANAFTOSA, .

  29. European Pharmacopoeia. (2017) Foot-and-mouth disease (ruminants) vaccine (inactivated) Eur. Ph. Vol. 01/2017, 0063. 9th ed.

  30. Darling A, Boose J, Spaltro J (1998) Virus assay methods: accuracy and validation. Biologicals 26:105–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Brito B, Puszek SJ, Hartwig EJ et al (2018) A traditional evolutionary history of foot-and-mouth disease viruses in Southeast Asia challenged by analyses of non-structural protein coding sequences. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24870-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Mahapatra M, Upadhyaya S, Aviso S et al (2017) Selection of vaccine strains for serotype O foot-and-mouth disease viruses (2007–2012) circulating in Southeast Asia East Asia and Far East. Vaccine 35(51):7147–7153

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Park M-Y, Han YJ, Choi E-J et al (2021) Post-vaccination monitoring to assess foot-and-mouth disease immunity at population level in Korea. Front Vet Sci 8:673820

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Park JH, Tark D, Lee KN et al (2018) Control of type O foot-and-mouth disease by vaccination in Korea, 2014–2015. J Vet Sci 19:271–279

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. OIE, FAO (2020) Foot-and-mouth disease reference laboratory network quarterly report 4. OIE World reference laboratory reports

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bergmann I, Malirat V, Pedemonte et al (2021) Challenges in foot-and-mouth disease virus strain selection as an input to attain broad vaccine intraserotype cross-protection. Expert Rev Vacc 10:55

    Google Scholar 

  37. Di Giacomo S, Bucafusco D, Barrionuevo F, et al. (2016) Effect of the antigen payload, polyvalence and revaccination in the protection conferred by FMD vacines against heterologous challenge in cattle.

  38. Open Session of the European Commision for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease (EUFMD); Oct 26–28Portugal Research Group of the Standing Technical Committee; Cascais.

  39. Bankowska K (2017) FAO world reference laboratory for foot-and-mouth disease (WRLFMD) genotyping report. The Pirbright Institute

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hwang J-H, Lee G, Kim A et al (2021) A vaccine strain of the A/ASIA/Sea-97 lineage of foot-and-mouth disease virus with a single amino acid substitution in the P1 region that is adapted to suspension culture provides high immunogenicity. Vaccines 9:308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen BJ, Sung WHT, Shieh WK (1999) Managing an animal health emergency inTaipei China: foot and mouth disease. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz 18(1):186–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Carolina Artuso for her assistance in the sequencing technique procedure. Some of the data were presented previously as a poster at the VIth Global Foot-and-Mouth Disease Research Alliance (GFRA) Meeting, 2021.

Funding

Laboratory work was funded with SENASA’s own resources. Sample collection and identification were funded by RAHO 6, DAH Vietnam.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabrina Galdo Novo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Sheela Ramamoorthy.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taffarel, A.I., Barrios Benito, M.Y., Hung, V.V. et al. Foot-and-mouth disease virus strains isolated in Vietnam during 2010-2019: genetic characterization and antigenic relatedness to the Euro SA vaccine. Arch Virol 169, 44 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-024-05960-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-024-05960-5

Navigation