Skip to main content
Log in

Complete genome sequence of Phobos: a novel bacteriophage with unusual genomic features that infects Pseudomonas syringae

  • Annotated Sequence Record
  • Published:
Archives of Virology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The GenBank database contains over 2580 complete genome sequences from bacteriophages. However, limited reports are available concerning phages can that lyse members of Pseudomonas syringae, although this is a widespread bacterial species that can infect almost 200 plant species. In the present study, we isolated and characterized a new Siphoviridae phage, named “Pseudomonas phage vB_PsyS_Phobos” (for brevity, referred to here as Phobos). To our knowledge, this is one of the first genome sequences reported for a phage with lytic activity against P. syringae pv. syringae. The genome of Phobos is dsDNA of 56,734 bp with a GC content of 63.3%, containing 65 ORFs. Genome analysis revealed that Phobos is a novel lytic phage with unique genomic features and low similarity to other phages, suggesting that Phobos represents a new phage genus. Genome sequencing did not reveal sequences with significant similarity to known virulence factors, antibiotic resistance genes, potential immunoreactive allergens, or lysogeny-related proteins, suggesting suggests that phage Phobos is strictly lytic. Therefore, Phobos may be suitable for formulation as a biocontrol agent against P. syringae pv. syringae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buttimer C, McAuliffe O, Ross R, Hill C, O’Mahony J, Coffey A (2017) Bacteriophages and bacterial plant diseases. Front Microbiol 8:34

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Mansfield J, Genin S, Magori S, Citovsky V, Sriariyanum M, Ronald P et al (2012) Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol 13(6):614–629

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kering K, Kibii B, Wei H (2019) Biocontrol of phytobacteria with bacteriophage cocktails. Pest Manag Sci 75(7):1775–1781

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cui Z, Guo X, Dong K, Zhang Y, Li Q, Zhu Y, Zeng L, Tang R, Lib L (2017) Safety assessment of Staphylococcus phages of the family Myoviridae based on complete genome sequences. Sci Rep 7(1):41259

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Adams MH (1956) Bacteriophages. Interscience publishers. Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Green M, Sambrook J (2018) Isolation of high-molecular-weight DNA from suspension cultures of mammalian cells using proteinase K and phenol. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 4:93476

    Google Scholar 

  7. Besemer J, Borodovsky M (2005) GeneMark: web software for gene finding in prokaryotes, eukaryotes and viruses. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W451–W454

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Finn R, Tate J, Mistry J et al (2007) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 36:D281–D288

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Philipson C, Voegtly L, Lueder M, Long KA, Rice GK, Frey KG et al (2018) Characterizing phage genomes for therapeutic applications. Viruses 10(4):188

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Naville M, Ghuillot-Gaudeffroy A, Marchais A, Gautheret D (2011) ARNold: A web tool for the prediction of Rho-independent transcription terminators. RNA Biol 8(1):11–13

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lowe T, Chan P (2016) tRNAscan-SE On-line: integrating search and context for analysis of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 44(W1):W54–W57

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Almpanis A, Swain M, Gatherer D, McEwan N (2018) Correlation between bacterial G+C content, genome size and the G+C content of associated plasmids and bacteriophages. Microb Genom 4(4):168

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dakheel K, Rahim R, Neela V, Al-Obaidi J, Hun T, Isa M, Yusoff K (2019) Genomic analyses of two novel biofilm-degrading methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus phages. BMC Microbiol 19(1):114

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Adriaenssens E, Brister J (2017) How to name and classify your phage: an informal guide. Viruses 9(4):70

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Support for this research was provided by the CONACYT (Project no. 251516). The author appreciates the excellent technical assistance of Oscar Patrón and Luis Figueroa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Lightbourn.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Handling Editor: T. K. Frey.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 267 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amarillas, L., Estrada-Acosta, M., León-Chan, R.G. et al. Complete genome sequence of Phobos: a novel bacteriophage with unusual genomic features that infects Pseudomonas syringae. Arch Virol 165, 1485–1488 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-020-04618-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-020-04618-2

Navigation