Abstract
Aleutian mink disease virus is one of the greatest threats to modern mink farming. The disease reduces fecundity and causes high mortality among kits. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of methisoprinol in counteracting the effects of Aleutian disease, both by inhibiting replication of the virus and by mitigating the harmful effects of the disease on the fecundity and weight of infected animals. The study included 300 individuals with confirmed infection, divided according to antibody titres into three experimental groups, which received a 20% methisoprinol solution, and three control groups, which did not receive the immunostimulant. In the mink from the experimental groups, the number of copies of the genetic material of the virus in the spleens and lymph nodes was one order of magnitude lower than in the case of the control groups. Mink receiving the supplement also showed higher fecundity (on average 5.83 in the experimental groups and 4.83 in the control groups), and the weight of their offspring before slaughter was over 200 g higher. Given the lack of effective methods for immunoprophylaxis and treatment, methisoprinol supplementation can be an effective means of counteracting the effects of AMDV on persistently infected farms.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Intensive mink farming and breeding are associated with increased exposure of the animals to infectious agents that have a negative impact on their health and well-being. One of the most common diseases affecting mink farming is Aleutian disease (AD), caused by Aleutian mink disease virus (AMDV) – an ssDNA virus belonging to the genus Amdoparvovirus, family Parvoviridae.
AD is a chronic and incurable disease in mink that results in breeding losses due to frequent abortion, low fecundity, and high juvenile mortality. Low reproductive parameters, manifested as a small number of reared kits, translate directly into the number of pelts produced and the profitability of breeding [1].
AMDV exhibits tropism for immune cells, especially B lymphocytes. The persistent and rapid replication of the virus in the body of infected mink leads to impairment of immune functions. The virus stimulates the host to synthesize excessive quantities of specific antibodies, leading to hypergammaglobulinaemia and the formation of immune complexes. When these complexes are deposited in tissues, they cause inflammation and pathological changes [2]. The disease can have a varied clinical course, from transient infections to persistent and progressive infections [3].
Due to the lack of causative treatment and specific immunoprophylaxis, as well as the growing problem of asymptomatic AMDV infections, there is a need for research on alternative methods to control Aleutian disease and minimize its harmful effects. One such method is nonspecific immunostimulation, which involves enhancing innate immunity using immunomodulatory drugs.
One immunostimulant preparation used against viral diseases is methisoprinol (inosine pranobex or Isoprinosine), a combination of inosine, acetamidobenzoic acid, and dimethylaminoisopropanol. Methisoprinol affects both humoral and cellular mechanisms of the immune response, through the activation of T and B lymphocytes, stimulation of macrophage proliferation and activity, and increased synthesis of interferon [4]. The preparation has been shown to reduce virus titres in cell cultures infected with Aujeszky’s disease virus and Newcastle disease virus [5]. The aim of this research was to evaluate selected breeding parameters on a mink farm persistently infected with AMDV following the use of a 20% solution of methisoprinol, a drug with immunopotentiating properties.
Materials and methods
Experimental animals
The research was conducted from November 2015 to the end of October 2016 at a mink farm located in the Wielkopolska Voivodeship, with 10,000 females in the foundation stock. The sanitary condition of the farm was assessed as good. The mink were fed in a traditional system according to recommended standards for this species and for individual periods of the breeding cycle, including mineral and vitamin supplements and permanent access to water. Table 1 presents the ranges of metabolic energy (ME) values and the percentages of ME contributed by individual nutrients in the diet during the annual breeding cycle.
AMDV infections are endemic on the mink farm under study in the experiment. They have been confirmed by counter-current electrophoresis, ELISA assays, and PCR. A total of 300 female brown mink with positive ELISA results were selected for the experiment.
The biological material for serological diagnosis of AMDV comprised blood samples collected from live mink before the start of the experiment by toenail clipping into capillary tubes. The samples were tested using ELISA assays (Scintilla Development Company LLC, ADV Antibody ELISA).
The mink were initially divided into three experimental groups (groups 1, 2 and 3) and three control groups (groups C1, C2 and C3) of 50 animals each according to the antibody titres obtained in the ELISA assay. Group 1 and control group C1 comprised minks in which the ELISA assay demonstrated an antibody titre designated as + according to the recommendations of the ELISA assay manufacturer; groups 2 and C2 were mink with a ++ antibody titre; and groups 3 and C3 were animals in which the antibody titre was designated as +++. The research was carried out with the consent of the Second Local Ethics Committee for Experiments on Animals at the University of Life Sciences in Lublin (resolution no. 30/2010).
We used a 20% solution of methisoprinol (VetAgro) for active nonspecific immunostimulation of the mink. The choice of this immunostimulant is justified both by the results of preliminary tests and literature reports confirming its antiviral and immunostimulatory effect [4,5,6,7,8,9].
In the first stage of the experiment, i.e., from the preparatory period to the end of whelping, 20% methisoprinol was administered only to females of the foundation stock in the experimental groups (groups 1, 2 and 3, with different baseline antibody titres), twice a month with a three-day interval in December, January and February, and additionally twice with a three-day interval in the second half of pregnancy (day 35 – completed organogenesis period), at an oral dose of 40 mg/kg body weight. The mink from the control groups (C1, C2 andC3) received the same feed as the experimental animals but without methisoprinol.
In the second stage of the experiment (after whelping was completed), the first dose of 20% methisoprinol was administered to females of the foundation stock in the experimental groups together with their four-week-old offspring (first transition to solid feed) and then again at the age of eight weeks (weaning period), at an oral dose of 40 mg/kg body weight. Thereafter, both the females in the experimental groups and their juvenile offspring received an oral dose of the preparation in the amount of 40 mg/kg body weight, twice a month with a three-day interval until slaughter, i.e., until the end of October.
Methisoprinol was mixed with the feed ration. An automatic feed system was used, which facilitates uniform feed administration to each cage. The immunostimulant was added to each portion (for each cage) individually.
Reproductive parameters and the body weight of the offspring were assessed in the groups of experimental and control females. Reproductive parameters of females in all groups were assessed on the 10th day after whelping and at the end of the breeding period. The body weight of the offspring was assessed after the end of the breeding period (November 15).
DNA extraction
DNA was extracted from the spleen and lymph nodes, which were cut into small pieces weighing 5 mg. DNA was isolated using a commercial DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s protocol with some modifications. Tissues were lysed using Tissuelyser II (QIAGEN) for 20 seconds at a frequency of 20 1/s, and then 200 μl of ATL buffer was added. Samples were washed twice with AW2 buffer. The elution was prepared in a 150-μl volume.
Quantitative assessment of the numbers of copies of AMDV by qPCR
A total of 84 mink were tested, including 21 females from the foundation stock (three experimental groups) and 21 of their offspring, which had received an oral dose of 20% methisoprinol in the amount of 40 mg/kg BW according to the design described above. The remaining 42 minks (21 females from the foundation stock together with their offspring), which did not receive 20% methisoprinol, were used as controls. After slaughter, lymph nodes (n = 168) and spleens (n = 84) were taken from the mink of both groups, and DNA was extracted from them – 84 samples from the lymph nodes and 84 from the spleens.
Viral load in the spleen and lymph nodes was determined using a qPCR assay targeting a conserved sequence of the NS1 gene. To determine the number of copies of the genetic material of the virus, qPCR was performed using primer 1 (5’- GAAGAATACTGGCAACTCACAACCT-3’), hybridizing to nucleotides 253–277, and primer 2 (5’- GTCGCAGTTTTCCGTGTTCA-3’), hybridizing to nucleotides 303–322 of AMDV isolate HY F17 NS1 (accession number KM374812.1), a TaqMan probe (5’-FAM- CAAAGAGTGCAGAAAGT-BHQ1-3’), and an 88-bp nucleotide construct serving as a size standard in the qPCR reaction. The 88-bp recombinant plasmid construct was obtained from a commercial company Genomed S.A. (Warsaw), and serial dilutions of a stock solution containing recombinant plasmid DNA (AMDV, 106 to 100 copies/μL) were used to create a standard curve.
All samples were initially tested by real-time PCR using a commercial kit (QuantiTectprobe PCR Kit) and a Rotor-Gene Q thermal cycler (QIAGEN, Germany). Assays were performed in a 20-µl reaction volume consisting of 400 nM of each primer and probe. Assays were performed using a CFX Connect Real-Time System (Bio-Rad, USA). The samples were initially kept at 50 °C for 2 min followed by 10 min at 95 °C, and then 50 temperature cycles of 15 seconds at 95 °C and 1 minute at 55 °C.
Serial dilutions of a stock solution containing recombinant plasmid DNA (AMDV, 106 to 100 copies/μL) were used to construct a standard curve for quantification of DNA. To transform Cq values obtained in the qPCR assays to the number of viral copies, we used the following formula: Number of copies = 10((Cq-b)/m), where m is the slope and b is the intercept from the regression equation. Negative and positive controls were included in each reaction run.
Statistical analysis
The results of quantitative analysis of viral load and breeding parameters were analysed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine whether there were any statistically significant differences between the means. The calculations were made using the SAS statistics package (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Statistical significance was established as p ≤ 0.05.
Amplification, sequencing and bioinformatic analysis
DNA extracted from spleens (n = 84) was used for PCR amplification with two pairs of primers targeting the VP2 structural protein fragment [10]. The primer sequences, reaction conditions, and composition of the mix are given in Tables 2 and 3. The PCR products were separated in a 1% agarose gel with ethidium bromide at 60 V. The reaction products were subsequently used in the sequencing reaction.
PCR products for the V2 primers were purified using an ExoSAP-IT kit (Affymetrix). The same primers as for the original amplification were used for sequencing PCR. A BigDye® Terminator v. 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems) was used, and the reactions were carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The sequencing PCR products were purified using a DyeEx Spin Kit (QIAGEN) on a QIAcube apparatus. The samples were subjected to thermal denaturation in formamide. The sequencing reaction for the forward and reverse primers was carried out in a 3100-Avant Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystems). Sequencing results were analysed using Baser DNA software. The sequences used in the alignment were taken from the NCBI bioinformatic database. Sequence editing and alignment were carried out using MEGA6 and Bioedit software.
Results
Results of quantitative AMDV assessment in the submandibular lymph nodes and spleen
The experimental groups consisting of young and adult females showed a viral titre one order of magnitude lower than in the controls in both the spleen and the lymph nodes (statistically significant difference, p = 0.05) (Fig. 1). The average number of viral copies for the lymphoid tissues was considered an indicator of the degree of AMDV infection. The results indicate more-intensive replication of AMDV in the lymph nodes, where the pathogen reached 103copies in the experimental group, while the viral load in the spleen was one order of magnitude lower. A similar relationship was noted in the control group. Irrespective of the tissue examined, the number of viral copies decreased by one order of magnitude following supplementation with methisoprinol.
Breeding parameters
Breeding parameters were evaluated ten days after whelping (Fig. 2). In the control groups, 78% of 50 normally mated females whelped in group C1, 80% in group C2, and 82% in group C3. The average number of kits per litter in control groups C1, C2 and C3 was 4.9, 4.5 and 5.1 (average 4.83 ± 0.2). In the experimental groups, also numbering 50 females each, 86% of females whelped in group 1, 94% in group 2 and 90% in group 3. The average number of kits per litter was 5.4 in group 1, 6.2 in group 2, and 5.9 in group 3 (average 5.83 ± 0.26). On October 30, i.e. two weeks before slaughter, the total mean number of kits per litter was 4.38 ± 0.31 in the experimental groups of mink and 3.02 ± 0.64 in the control groups. No statistical differences were found between litter size categories. In the experimental groups, the body weight of the young mink before slaughter averaged 1,896.67 g and was 12% higher than in the controls (1,671.67 g – statistically significant difference at p = 0.05).
Molecular characterization of AMDV isolates
The presence of AMDV genetic material was confirmed in both the experimental and control groups. PCR yielded a positive result with both primer pairs. After sequencing, a 1,106-bp fragment of the sequence encoding the structural protein VP2 was obtained. Bioinformatic analysis showed eight variants among the virus isolates, with a high degree of similarity exceeding 98.5%. Variants of AMDV isolates were distinguished on the basis of 16 SNP polymorphisms. A significant difference was found in the nucleotide sequence between the isolates and the Utah, AMDV-G and Pullman reference strains. The isolates were most similar to the Utah 1-kit strain (96% similarity), followed by the nonpathogenic AMDV-G strain (93%), while the lowest similarity was noted in relation to the Pullman strain (91.5%).
Discussion
Constant and long-term exposure to AMDV can lead to the development of mechanisms that reduce its harmful effects [11]. Attempts have been made at selection of mink for tolerance to the virus in order to obtain individuals with increased resistance to AMDV infection in subsequent generations [12]. Selection is a long-term process, and thus far no markers indicating increased resistance to AMDV have been detected. Therefore, there is a need for alternative methods to counteract the harmful effect of the pathogen on reproductive parameters in mink.
The present study showed that methisoprinol mitigated the effects of infection with Aleutian disease virus. Differences in the number of copies of viral DNA in the spleen and lymph nodes of the mink in the experimental groups indicate a significantly lower rate of AMDV replication (fewer virus copies) in the lymphoid tissues of mink that had received 20% methisoprinol than in the control groups. In the case of the spleen, the replication rate of the virus was higher in young mink than in the females of the foundation stock, while in the lymph nodes the trend was reversed, which may indicate primary replication of the pathogen in the spleen and gradual colonization of the lymphatic system as the animal developed. The preparation exhibits direct antiviral activity through its inhibitory effect on DNA replication and RNA synthesis in the pathogen [5, 13]. An important property of methisoprinol in the case of infection with AMDV is the fact that it induced an increase in phagocyte activity in the spleen [8], the organ with the highest rate of replication of the pathogen, in addition to a normalizing effect on lymphocyte proliferation, inhibiting the harmful effects of hypergammaglobulinaemia [14]. A study by Ahmed et al. [15] demonstrated that a formulation based on inosine acedoben dimepranol caused an increase in the NK cell fraction and thereby enhanced the body’s immune response against viruses, including in immunocompromised individuals. The involvement of NK cells in the response to viral infections has been demonstrated in infections with influenza virus, hepatitis C virus and cytomegalovirus (CMV) [16]. The immunostimulant also strengthens the immune response by increasing such phagocytic parameters as respiratory burst activity (RBA) and potential killing activity (PKA) [7, 17]. Beran et al. [18] have confirmed not only the efficacy of inosine pranobex in the treatment of viral respiratory infections but also its safety for the individuals taking it.
The effects of the immunostimulant have also been confirmed in research conducted by Stenzel et al. [9], who showed that methisoprinol at a dose of 200 mg/kg body weight, administered after infection, inhibited the replication of pigeon paramyxovirus type 1, which infects pigeons. The researchers suggested that the course of the disease was mitigated, despite the presence of the infectious agent, through inhibition of its replication and a reduction in the number of viral copies in the infected tissue; however, RT-PCR did not conclusively verify this hypothesis. In our study, the viral load in both the spleens and the lymph nodes of the mink in the experimental group was one order of magnitude lower than in the control group. The effect of reduced virus replication and the immunostimulatory effect of the drug counteracted the effects of infection, which was manifested by the larger litter size and greater weight of animals from the experimental group. A favourable influence of Isoprinosine on reproduction has also been observed by Humelt et al. [19], who confirmed that immunostimulation of pregnant mares may reduce losses caused by equine herpesvirus 1 (EHV-1). Immunostimulation may also have an impact on other economically important traits. Piech and Brodzki [20] investigated the influence of immunostimulation with Isoprinosine on the hygienic quality of milk from cows with mastitis. The results indicated that supplementation with the preparation improves hygienic parameters of milk and has a beneficial therapeutic effect on cows with mastitis. Procajło et. al. [21] examined the effects of immunostimulation coupled with vaccination against mycoplasmal pneumonia of swine. Administration of methisoprinol 48 h before vaccination resulted in a beneficial effect on health status and production parameters, such as meatiness.
The cost of the treatment may be a factor limiting common use of methisoprinol in prophylaxis of Aleutian disease. Treatment of one animal for three months consumes nearly 50% of the profits from a single fur. However, taking into account the larger litter size obtained in the experimental groups (one more kit per litter than in the control groups), the cost of supplementation for a single female amounts to less than 25% of the income from a single fur. Therefore, the additional income from the larger litter size may compensate for the cost of the supplementation.
Early and specific diagnosis plays a key role in inhibiting the spread of AMDV. Our research has confirmed the high effectiveness of molecular methods based on both PCR and qPCR, which have also been used by other researchers to diagnose Aleutian disease [22,23,24,25]. Techniques based on amplification of nucleic acids are increasingly used to supplement serological tests, making it possible to eliminate infected animals from infected farms. In addition to diagnostics, molecular methods are used to assess the molecular epidemiology of the aetiological agent in a given area [2, 3, 26]. Our research, based on polymorphism in the sequence encoding the VP2 protein, showed eight closely related variants of the pathogen. High variability on a single farm has been confirmed by previous analyses conducted in Poland [27], as well as results reported by Canuti et al. [28], who observed considerable variation in the pathogen resulting from the high stocking density on the farm. Polymorphism in the nucleotide sequence of the VP2 protein of the virus may translate into changes in its structure and functionality and thus result in a varied immune response in the host. Hence, in our study, differences in antibody titres in the individual experimental and control groups, determined by the ELISA assay, may have been due to differences in the immune status of the infected mink and the amount of time that had passed since they became infected, as well as the properties of the infecting strain.
In this study, we investigated the effect of a 20% methisoprinol solution on selected breeding parameters of mink infected with Aleutian disease virus, and confirmed its effectiveness against infection with this virus. Given the lack of effective treatment for Aleutian disease and its high incidence, immunostimulation may be a solution for minimizing the harmful effect of the disease on breeding efficiency on farms with persistent AMDV infection. Use of the preparation in mink when they are still young may improve production parameters.
References
Huang Q, Luo Y, Cheng F, Best SM, Bloom ME, Qiu J (2014) Molecular characterization of the small nonstructural proteins of parvovirus Aleutian mink disease virus (AMDV) during infection. Virology 452:23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2014.01.005
Leimann A, Knuuttila A, Maran T, Vapalahti O, Saarma U (2015) Molecular epidemiology of Aleutian mink disease virus (AMDV) in Estonia, and a global phylogeny of AMDV. Virus Res 199:56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2015.01.011
Knuuttila A, Uzcategui N, Kankkonen J, Vapalahti O, Kinnunen P (2009) Molecular epidemiology of Aleutian mink disease virus in Finland. Vet Microbiol 133:229–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.07.003
Kazuń B, Siwicki AK (2013) Impact of Bioimmuno with methisoprinol on non-specific cellular and humoral defense mechanisms and resistance of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) to experimental infection with iridovirus. Arch Pol Fisheries 21(4):301–331. https://doi.org/10.2478/aopf-2013-0031
Siwicki AK, Pozet F, Morand M, Kazun B, Trapkowska S (2002) In vitro effect of methisoprinol on salmonid rhabdoviruses replication. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 46:53–58
Siwicki AK, Malaczewska J, Kazun B, Wojcik R (2008) Immunomodulating effect of methisoprinol on the pronephros macrophage and lymphocyte activity after suppression induced by infectious haematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Acta Vet Brno 77:631–636. https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200877040631
Siwicki AK, Jung L, Malaczewska J, Wojcik R (2009) The influence of methisoprinol on the spleen phagocyte and blood lymphocyte activity in rats—in vitro study. Cent Eur J Immunol 34:227–231
Koncicki A, Tykalowski B, Stenzel T, Andrzejewski M (2009) Assessment of the efficiency of applying methisoprinol and vaccination of turkeys against the haemorrhagic enteritis virus using in ovo methods. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 53:13–15
Stenzel T, Tykalowski B, Smialek M, Pestka D, Koncicki A (2014) Influence of methisoprinol on the course of an experimental infection with PPMV-1 in pigeons. Med Weter 70:219–223
Costello F, Steenfos N, Jensen KT, Christensen J, Gottschalck E, Holm A, Aasted B (1999) Epitope mapping of aleutian mink disease parvovirus virion protein VP1 and 2. Scand J Immunol 49:347–354. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3083.1999.00499.x
Kowalczyk M, Jakubczak A, Horecka B, Kostro K (2018) A comparative molecular characterization of AMDV strains isolated from cases of clinical and subclinical infection. Virus Genes 54:561–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-018-1576-x
Farid AH, Ferns LE (2017) Reduced severity of histopathological lesions in mink selected for tolerance to Aleutian mink disease virus infection. Res Vet Sci 111:127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.02.009
Issrani R, Prabhu N, Keluskar V (2013) Oral proliferative verrucous leukoplakia: a case report with an update. Contemp Clin Dent 4:258–262. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237x.114887
Feily A (2010) Methisoprinol: a novel addition to hyper IgE arsenal. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 32:530–531. https://doi.org/10.3109/08923970903383897
Ahmed SR, Newman AS, O’Daly J, Duffy S, Grafton G, Brady CA, Curnow SJ, Barnes NM, Gordon J (2017) Inosine Acedoben Dimepranol promotes an early and sustained increase in the natural killer cell component of circulating lymphocytes: A clinical trial supporting anti-viral indications. Int Immunopharmacol 42:108–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2016.11.023
Jost S, Altfeld M (2013) Control of human viral infections by natural killer cells. Annu Rev Immunol 31:163–194. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-100001
Brodzki P, Lisiecka U, Brodzki A, Pyz-Lukasik R, Krakowski L (2018) Phagocytic and oxidative burst activity of phagocytic cells in peripheral blood and uterine washings in cows with clinical endometritis before and after intrauterine use of cephapirin and methisoprinol. Anim Sci J 89(10):1389–1397. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13088
Beran J, Salapova E, Spajdel M, Isoprinosine Study EI (2016) Inosine pranobex is safe and effective for the treatment of subjects with confirmed acute respiratory viral infections: analysis and subgroup analysis from a Phase 4, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. BMC Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1965-5
Humelt K, Grądzki Z, Jarosz Ł (2016) Impact of natural EHV-1 infection and non-specific immunostimulation of mares on the reproductive effect. Med Weter 72(2):96–101
Piech T, Brodzki P (2009) Effect of immunostimulation with methisoprinol on the hygienic quality of cows’ raw milk. Med Weter 65(12):844–847
Procajło Z, Szweda W, Mikulska-Skupień E, Platt-Samoraj A (2010) Effect of the coupled administration of Lydium-KLP or methisoprinol and respisure on the health status and prevention of mycoplasmal pneumonia of swine in large-scale commercial breeding. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 54:9–14
Jensen TH, Christensen LS, Chriel M, Uttenthal A, Hammer AS (2011) Implementation and validation of a sensitive PCR detection method in the eradication campaign against Aleutian mink disease virus. J Virol Methods 171:81–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.10.004
Prieto A, Fernandez-Antonio R, Diaz-Cao JM, Lopez G, Diaz P, Alonso JM, Morrondo P, Fernandez G (2017) Distribution of Aleutian mink disease virus contamination in the environment of infected mink farms. Vet Microbiol 204:59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.05.024
Prieto A, Manuel Diaz-Cao J, Fernandez-Antonio R, Panadero R, Diaz P, Lopez C, Morrondo P, Diez-Banos P, Fernandez G (2014) Application of real-time PCR to detect Aleutian Mink Disease Virus on environmental farm sources. Vet Microbiol 173:355–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.07.024
Prieto A, Diaz-Cao JM, Fernandez-Antonio R, Panadero R, Lopez-Lorenzo G, Diaz P, Perez-Creo A, Morrondo MP, Fernandez G (2018) Lesser housefly (Fannia canicularis) as possible mechanical vector for Aleutian mink disease virus. Vet Microbiol 221:90–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.04.013
Persson S, Jensen TH, Blomstrom A-L, Appelberg MT, Magnusson U (2015) Aleutian mink disease virus in free-ranging mink from Sweden. PLoS One 10(3):e0122194. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122194
Jakubczak A, Kowalczyk M, Kostro K, Horecka B, Jezewska-Witkowska G (2016) High molecular polymorphism of the hypervariable region in the VP2 gene of Aleutian mink disease virus. Acta Virol 60:354–360. https://doi.org/10.4149/av_2016_04_354
Canuti M, O’Leary KE, Hunter BD, Spearman G, Ojkic D, Whitney HG, Lang AS (2016) Driving forces behind the evolution of the Aleutian mink disease parvovirus in the context of intensive farming. Virus Evol. https://doi.org/10.1093/ve/vew004
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Additional information
Handling Editor: Ana Cristina Bratanich.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary material 1
Graphical presentation of designed experiment (TIFF 67 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Kowalczyk, M., Gąsiorek, B., Kostro, K. et al. Breeding parameters on a mink farm infected with Aleutian mink disease virus following the use of methisoprinol. Arch Virol 164, 2691–2698 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-019-04375-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-019-04375-x