Advertisement

Archives of Virology

, Volume 163, Issue 7, pp 1757–1767 | Cite as

Laser-cut paper-based device for the detection of dengue non-structural NS1 protein and specific IgM in human samples

  • G. Theillet
  • A. Rubens
  • F. Foucault
  • P. Dalbon
  • C. Rozand
  • I. Leparc-Goffart
  • F. Bedin
Original Article

Abstract

The incidence of flavivirus infections has increased dramatically in recent decades in tropical and sub-tropical areas worldwide, affecting hundreds of millions of people each year. Dengue viruses are typically transmitted by mosquitoes and can cause a wide range of symptoms from flu-like fever to organ impairment and death. Although conventional diagnostic tests can provide early diagnosis of acute dengue infections, access to these tests is often limited in developing countries. Consequently, there is an urgent need to develop affordable, simple, rapid, and robust diagnostic tools that can be used at ‘Point of Care’ settings. Early diagnosis is crucial to improve patient management and reduce the risk of complications. In the present study, a novel laser-cut device made of glass-fiber paper was designed and tested for the detection of the dengue Non Structural 1 (NS1) viral protein and specific IgM in blood and plasma. The device, called PAD, was able to detect around 25 ng/mL of NS1 protein in various sample types in 8 minutes, following a few simple steps. The PAD was also able to detect specific IgM in human plasmas in less than 10 minutes. The PAD appears to have all the potential to assist health workers in early diagnosis of dengue fever or other tropical fevers caused by flaviviruses.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors wish to thank Marc Bossus, Celine Roesch, Michèle Guillote (Immunoassays department of bioMérieux) for antibody productions; Florence Bettworth, Blandine Le Levreur and Marie-Claire Cavaud (Immunoassays department of bioMérieux) for antibody purification and labeling. Special thanks to Maxime Combe and Fabien Fulmar for providing various raw materials. The final manuscript has been red and corrected by RWS life science, Lausane, CH.

Author contributions

All of the authors contributed to the study conception. AR and FF carried out the PAD design and manufacturing. GT, AR and FB performed research. FB, GT and AR wrote the manuscript. All of the authors analyzed data, read, corrected and approved the final manuscript. FB, PD, ILG and CR performed the study coordination and funding.

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

This study was funded by BioMerieux SA and Agence Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie (G. Theillet’s grant CIFRE no 2015/0514).

Conflict of Interest

All the authors (except I. Leparc -Goffart) are employed by bioMerieux SA.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

705_2018_3776_MOESM1_ESM.doc (126 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 126 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmed S, Bui MPN, Abbas A (2016) Paper-based chemical and biological sensors: engineering aspects. Biosens Bioelectron 77:249–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alcon S, Talarmin A, Debruyne M, Falconar A, Deubel V, Flamand M (2002) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay specific to Dengue virus type 1 nonstructural protein NS1 reveals circulation of the antigen in the blood during the acute phase of disease in patients experiencing primary or secondary infections. J Clin Microbiol 40:376–381CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Althouse BM, Hanley KA, Diallo M, Sall AA, Ba Y, Faye O, Diallo D, Watts DM, Weaver SC, Cummings DA (2015) Impact of climate and mosquito vector abundance on sylvatic arbovirus circulation dynamics in Senegal. Am J Trop Med Hyg 92:88–97CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    PS-M (2013) CO 2-laser cutting and ablative etching for the fabrication of paper-based devices. J Micromech Microeng 23:067003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Apilux A, Ukita Y, Chikae M, Chailapakul O, Takamura Y (2013) Development of automated paper-based devices for sequential multistep sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays using inkjet printing. Lab Chip 13:126–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Batra G, Nemani SK, Tyagi P, Swaminathan S, Khanna N (2011) Evaluation of envelope domain III-based single chimeric tetravalent antigen and monovalent antigen mixtures for the detection of anti-dengue antibodies in human sera. BMC Infect Dis 11:64CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bedin F, Boulet L, Voilin E, Theillet G, Rubens A, Rozand C (2017) Paper-based point-of-care testing for cost-effective diagnosis of acute flavivirus infections. J Med Virol 89:1520–1527CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carrilho E, Martinez AW, Whitesides GM (2009) Understanding wax printing: a simple micropatterning process for paper-based microfluidics. Anal Chem 81:7091–7095CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cate DM, Adkins JA, Mettakoonpitak J, Henry CS (2015) Recent developments in paper-based microfluidic devices. Anal Chem 87:19–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cedillo-Barron L, Garcia-Cordero J, Bustos-Arriaga J, Leon-Juarez M, Gutierrez-Castaneda B (2014) Antibody response to dengue virus. Microbes Infect 16:711–720CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen J, Wen K, Li XQ, Yi HS, Ding XX, Huang YF, Pan YX, Hu DM, Di B, Che XY, Fu N (2016) Functional properties of DENV EDIIIreactive antibodies in human DENV1infected sera and rabbit antiserum to EDIII. Mol Med Rep 14:1799–1808CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheung SF, Cheng SK, Kamei DT (2015) Paper-based systems for point-of-care biosensing. J Lab Autom 20:316–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chin C, Chin S, Laksanasopin T, Sia S (2013) Low-cost microdevices for point-of-care testing. In: Issadore D, Westervelt RM (eds) Point-of-care diagnostics on a chip. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Choi JR, Hu J, Tang R, Gong Y, Feng S, Ren H, Wen T, Li X, Wan Abas WAB, Pingguan-Murphy B, Xu F (2016) An integrated paper-based sample-to-answer biosensor for nucleic acid testing at the point of care. Lab Chip 16:611–621CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Combe M, Lacoux X, Martinez J, Mejan O, Luciani F, Daniel S (2017) Expression, refolding and bio-structural analysis of a tetravalent recombinant dengue envelope domain III protein for serological diagnosis. Protein Expr Purif 133:57–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cucunawangsih Lugito NP, Kurniawan A (2015) Immunoglobulin G (IgG) to IgM ratio in secondary adult dengue infection using samples from early days of symptoms onset. BMC Infect Dis 15:276CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dussart P, Petit L, Labeau B, Bremand L, Leduc A, Moua D, Matheus S, Baril L (2008) Evaluation of two new commercial tests for the diagnosis of acute dengue virus infection using NS1 antigen detection in human serum. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2:e280CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fang X, Wei S, Kong J (2014) Paper-based microfluidics with high resolution, cut on a glass fiber membrane for bioassays. Lab Chip 14:911–915CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Flamand M, Megret F, Mathieu M, Lepault J, Rey FA, Deubel V (1999) Dengue virus type 1 nonstructural glycoprotein NS1 is secreted from mammalian cells as a soluble hexamer in a glycosylation-dependent fashion. J Virol 73:6104–6110PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fu E, Liang T, Houghtaling J, Ramachandran S, Ramsey SA, Lutz B, Yager P (2011) Enhanced sensitivity of lateral flow tests using a two-dimensional paper network format. Anal Chem 83:7941–7946CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fu E, Liang T, Spicar-Mihalic P, Houghtaling J, Ramachandran S, Yager P (2012) Two-dimensional paper network format that enables simple multistep assays for use in low-resource settings in the context of malaria antigen detection. Anal Chem 84:4574–4579CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gan W, Zhuang B, Zhang P, Han J, Li CX, Liu P (2014) A filter paper-based microdevice for low-cost, rapid, and automated DNA extraction and amplification from diverse sample types. Lab Chip 14:3719–3728CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Granger D, Leo YS, Lee LK, Theel ES Serodiagnosis of dengue virus infection using commercially available antibody and NS1 antigen ELISAsGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mahato K, Srivastava A, Chandra P (2017) Paper based diagnostics for personalized health care: emerging technologies and commercial aspects. Biosens Bioelectron 96:246–259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mahmud M, Blondeel EJM, Kaddoura M, MacDonald BD (2016) Creating compact and microscale features in paper-based devices by laser cutting. Analyst 141:6449–6454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Marcondes CB, Ximenes MF (2016) Zika virus in Brazil and the danger of infestation by Aedes (Stegomyia) mosquitoes. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 49:4–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Martinez AW, Phillips ST, Whitesides GM (2008) Three-dimensional microfluidic devices fabricated in layered paper and tape. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19606–19611CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Martinez AW, Phillips ST, Whitesides GM, Carrilho E (2010) Diagnostics for the developing world: microfluidic paper-based analytical devices. Anal Chem 82:3–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mathengtheng L, Burt FJ (2014) Use of envelope domain III protein for detection and differentiation of flaviviruses in the Free State Province, South Africa. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis (Larchmont, NY) 14:261–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Niu G, Pang Z, Guan C, Qi J, Li D (2015) Dengue virus envelope domain III protein based on a tetravalent antigen secreted from insect cells: potential use for serological diagnosis. Virus Res 201:73–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Posthuma-Trumpie GA, Korf J, van Amerongen A (2009) Lateral flow (immuno)assay: its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. A literature survey. Anal Bioanal Chem 393:569–582CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Priyamvada L, Hudson W, Ahmed R, Wrammert J (2017) Humoral cross-reactivity between Zika and dengue viruses: implications for protection and pathology. Emerg Microbes Infect 6:e33CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pryor MJ, Wright PJ (1993) The effects of site-directed mutagenesis on the dimerization and secretion of the NS1 protein specified by dengue virus. Virology 194:769–780CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Villamil-Gomez WE, Franco-Paredes C (2016) The arboviral burden of disease caused by co-circulation and co-infection of dengue, chikungunya and Zika in the Americas. Travel Med Infect Dis 14:177–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Saswat T, Kumar A, Kumar S, Mamidi P, Muduli S, Debata NK, Pal NS, Pratheek BM, Chattopadhyay S, Chattopadhyay S (2015) High rates of co-infection of Dengue and Chikungunya virus in Odisha and Maharashtra, India during 2013. Infect Genet Evol J Mol Epidemiol Evol Genet Infect Dis 35:134–141Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shah P, Zhu X, Li CZ (2013) Development of paper-based analytical kit for point-of-care testing. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 13:83–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shukla J, Khan M, Tiwari M, Sannarangaiah S, Sharma S, Rao PV, Parida M (2009) Development and evaluation of antigen capture ELISA for early clinical diagnosis of chikungunya. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 65:142–149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    dlC-H SI, Flores-Aguilar H, Gonzalez-Mateos S, Lopez-Martinez I, Alpuche-Arand C, Ludert JE, del Angel RM (2013) Determination of viremia and concentration of circulating nonstructural protein 1 in patients infected with dengue virus in Mexico. Am J Trop Med Hyg 88:446–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Songjaroen T, Dungchai W, Chailapakul O, Henry CS, Laiwattanapaisal W (2012) Blood separation on microfluidic paper-based analytical devices. Lab Chip 12:3392–3398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Soni A, Jha SK (2015) A paper strip based non-invasive glucose biosensor for salivary analysis. Biosens Bioelectron 67:763–768CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Soo KM, Khalid B, Ching SM, Tham CL, Basir R, Chee HY (2017) Meta-analysis of biomarkers for severe dengue infections. PeerJ 5:e3589CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Steidel M, Fragnoud R, Guillotte M, Roesch C, Michel S, Meunier T, Paranhos-Baccala G, Gervasi G, Bedin F (2012) Nonstructural protein NS1 immunodominant epitope detected specifically in dengue virus infected material by a SELDI-TOF/MS based assay. J Med Virol 84:490–499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Steinhagen K, Probst C, Radzimski C, Schmidt-Chanasit J, Emmerich P, van EM, Schinkel J, Grobusch MP, Goorhuis A, Warnecke JM, Lattwein E, Komorowski L, Deerberg A, Saschenbrecker S, Stocker W, Schlumberger W (2016) Serodiagnosis of Zika virus (ZIKV) infections by a novel NS1-based ELISA devoid of cross-reactivity with dengue virus antibodies: a multicohort study of assay performance, 2015 to 2016. In: Euro surveillance: bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.  https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.50.30426
  44. 44.
    Tsai WY, Youn HH, Brites C, Tsai JJ, Tyson J, Pedroso C, Drexler JF, Stone M, Simmons G, Busch MP, Lanteri M, Stramer SL, Balmaseda A, Harris E, Wang WK (2017) Distinguishing secondary dengue virus infection from Zika virus infection with previous dengue by a combination of 3 simple serological tests. Clin Infect Dis 65:1829–1836CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Vazquez S, Ruiz D, Barrero R, Ramirez R, Calzada N, del Rosario PB, Reyes S, Guzman MG (2010) Kinetics of dengue virus NS1 protein in dengue 4-confirmed adult patients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 68:46–49CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vella SJ, Beattie P, Cademartiri R, Laromaine A, Martinez AW, Phillips ST, Mirica KA, Whitesides GM (2012) Measuring markers of liver function using a micropatterned paper device designed for blood from a fingerstick. Anal Chem 84:2883–2891CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wong SJ, Furuya A, Zou J, Xie X, Dupuis AP 2nd, Kramer LD, Shi PY (2017) A multiplex microsphere immunoassay for Zika virus diagnosis. EBioMedicine 16:136–140CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Yen CW, de Puig H, Tam JO, Gomez-Marquez J, Bosch I, Hamad-Schifferli K, Gehrke L (2015) Multicolored silver nanoparticles for multiplexed disease diagnostics: distinguishing dengue, yellow fever, and Ebola viruses. Lab Chip 15:1638–1641CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Yetisen AK, Akram MS, Lowe CR (2013) Paper-based microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices. Lab Chip 13:2210–2251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Zhang B, Salieb-Beugelaar GB, Nigo MM, Weidmann M, Hunziker P (2015) Diagnosing dengue virus infection: rapid tests and the role of micro/nanotechnologies. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med 11:1745–1761CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BioMerieux, Innovations New Immuno-Concepts, Chemin de l’OrmeMarcy-l’EtoileFrance
  2. 2.ERRIT, HIA LaveranMarseilleFrance

Personalised recommendations