Archives of Virology

, Volume 163, Issue 5, pp 1299–1305 | Cite as

Diversity of partial RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene sequences of soybean blotchy mosaic virus isolates from different host-, geographical- and temporal origins

  • Elrea Strydom
  • Gerhard Pietersen
Brief Report


Infection of soybean by the plant cytorhabdovirus soybean blotchy mosaic virus (SbBMV) results in significant yield losses in the temperate, lower-lying soybean production regions of South Africa. A 277 bp portion of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene of 66 SbBMV isolates from different: hosts, geographical locations in South Africa, and times of collection (spanning 16 years) were amplified by RT-PCR and sequenced to investigate the genetic diversity of isolates. Phylogenetic reconstruction revealed three main lineages, designated Groups A, B and C, with isolates grouping primarily according to geographic origin. Pairwise nucleotide identities ranged between 85.7% and 100% among all isolates, with isolates in Group A exhibiting the highest degree of sequence identity, and isolates of Groups A and B being more closely related to each other than to those in Group C. This is the first study investigating the genetic diversity of SbBMV.


Soybean blotchy mosaic virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene, maximum-likelihood analysis Pairwise nucleotide similarity 



Funding was provided by the Association of African Universities (AAU), the Genomics Research Institute (GRI) at the University of Pretoria, South Africa and through the National Research Foundation Incentive Grant for Rated Scientists.


  1. 1.
    Lamprecht RL et al (2010) Soybean blotchy mosaic virus, a new cytorhabdovirus found in South Africa. Plant Dis 94(11):1348–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jackson AO et al (2005) Biology of plant rhabdoviruses. Annu Rev Phytopathol 43:623–660CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dietzgen RG et al (2017) The family Rhabdoviridae: mono- and bipartite negative-sense RNA viruses with diverse genome organization and common evolutionary origins. Virus Res 227:158–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amarasinghe GK et al (2017) Taxonomy of the order Mononegavirales: update 2017. Arch Virol 162(8):2493–2504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pietersen G, Garnett HM (1990) A survey for the viruses of soybeans (Glycine max) in the Transvaal, South Africa. Phytophylactica 22(1):35–40Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pietersen G et al (1998) Relative abundance of soybean viruses in South Africa. Afr Plant Prot 4(2):65–70Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klerks MMJ et al (2004) Detection and tentative grouping of Strawberry crinkle virus isolates. Eur J Plant Pathol 110:45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Revill P et al (2005) Taro vein chlorosis virus: characterization and variability of a new nucleorhabdovirus. J Gen Virol 86(2):491–499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Talbi C et al (2011) Genetic diversity of perch rhabdovirus isolates based on the nucleoprotein and glycoprotein genes. Arch Virol 156:2133–2144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Callaghan B, Dietzgen RG (2005) Nucleocapsid gene variability reveals two subgroups of Lettuce necrotic yellows virus. Arch Virol 150:1661–1667CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bourhy H et al (2005) Phylogenetic relationships among rhabdoviruses inferred using the L polymerase gene. J Gen Virol 86(10):2849–2858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parrella G, Greco B (2016) Sequence variation of block III segment identifies three distinct lineages within Eggplant mottled dwarf virus isolates from Italy, Spain and Greece. Acta Virol 60:100–105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Petrzik K (2012) Bioinformatic analysis of the L polymerase gene leads to discrimination of new rhabdoviruses. J Phytopathol 160(7–8):377–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pappi PG et al (2016) Genetic variation of Eggplant mottled dwarf virus from annual and perennial plant hosts. Arch Virol 161(3):631–639CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    White EJ et al (2008) Modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide method improves robustness and versatility: The benchmark for plant RNA extraction. Biotechnol J 3:1424–1428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mallory A et al (2001) HC-Pro suppression of transgene silencing eliminates the small RNAs but not transgene methylation or the mobile signal. Plant Cell 13(3):571–583CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Strydom E, Pietersen G (2017) Alternative hosts and seed transmissibility of Soybean blotchy mosaic virus. Eur J Plant Pathol. Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Katoh K et al (2002) A novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30(14):3059–3066CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tamura K et al (2011) MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2371–2739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Muhire B et al (2013) A genome-wide pairwise-identity-based proposal for the classification of viruses in the genus Mastrevirus (family Geminiviridae). Arch Virol 158(6):1411–1424CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tamura K, Nei M (1993) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 10(3):512–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Higgins CM et al (2016) Diversity and evolutionary history of Lettuce necrotic yellows virus in Australia and New Zealand. Arch Virol 161(2):269–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ali A et al (2006) Analysis of genetic bottlenecks during horizontal transmission of Cucumber mosaic virus. J Virol 80(17):8345–8350CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Canto T, Aranda MA, Fereres A (2009) Climate change effects on physiology and population processes of hosts and vectors that influence the spread of hemipteran-borne plant viruses. Glob Change Biol 15(8):1884–1894CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Microbiology and Plant PathologyUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology InstituteUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
  3. 3.Genetics DepartmentUniversity of StellenboschStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations