Enemies with benefits: mutualistic interactions of viruses with lower eukaryotes
Viruses represent some of the deadliest pathogens known to science. Recently they have been reported to have mutualistic interactions with their hosts, providing them direct or indirect benefits. The mutualism and symbiogenesis of such viruses with lower eukaryotic partners such as fungi, yeast, and insects have been reported but the full mechanism of interaction often remains an enigma. In many instances, these viral interactions provide resistance against several biotic and abiotic stresses, which could be the prime reason for the ecological success and positive selection of the hosts. These viruses modulate host metabolism and behavior, so both can obtain maximum benefits from the environment. They bring about micro- and macro-level changes in the hosts, benefiting their adaptation, reproduction, development, and survival. These virus-host interactions can be bilateral or tripartite with a variety of interacting partners. Exploration of these interactions can shed light on one of the well-coordinated biological phenomena of co-evolution and can be highly utilized for various applications in agriculture, fermentation and the pharmaceutical industries.
Authors acknowledge Dr. Tuli Dey, Dr. Rohan Khadilkar and Dr. Sneha Bansode for their critical comments. Authors also acknowledge Ms. Yoshita Bhide and Ms. Shriya Lele for their editorial assistance.
The concept was developed and articulated by SSJ and RSJ. Manuscript was written and edited by SSJ and RSJ.
Financial support is provided by the research grant from Department of Science and Technology, Government of India under ECR/2015/000502 Grant and Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune 411007, Maharashtra India.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
- 2.Margulis L, Sagan D (2008) Acquiring genomes: a theory of the origins of species. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 13.Rodriguez RJ, Woodward C, Kim YO, Redman RS (2009) Habitat-adapted symbiosis as a defense against abiotic and biotic stresses. In: White JF Jr, Torres MS (eds) Defensive mutualism in microbial symbiosis, vol 26. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 335–346Google Scholar
- 14.Al-Hamdani S, Stoelting A, Morsy M (2014) Influence of symbiosis between fungus, virus, and tomato plant in combating heat stress. J Ala Acad Sci 85:150–160Google Scholar
- 34.Boone C, Sdicu AM, Wagner J, Degre R, Sanchez C, Bussey H (1990) Integration of the yeast K1 killer toxin gene into the genome of marked wine yeasts and its effect on vinification. Am J Enol Vitic 41:37–42Google Scholar
- 47.Maure F, Brodeur J, Ponlet N, Doyon J, Firlej A, Elguero É, Thomas F (2011) The cost of a bodyguard. Biol Lett 7:843–846Google Scholar
- 52.Weldon SR, Oliver KM (2016) Diverse bacteriophage roles in an aphid-bacterial defensive mutualism. In: Hurst C (ed) The mechanistic benefits of microbial symbionts. Advances in environmental microbiology, vol 2. Springer, Cham, pp 173–206Google Scholar
- 67.Di Prisco G, Annoscia D, Margiotta M, Ferrara R, Varricchio P, Zanni V et al (2016) A mutualistic symbiosis between a parasitic mite and a pathogenic virus undermines honey bee immunity and health. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 7:201523515Google Scholar
- 75.Maiti IB, Dey N, Pattanaik S, Dahlman DL, Rana RL, Webb BA (2003) Antibiosis-type insect resistance in transgenic plants expressing a teratocyte secretory protein (TSP14) gene from a hymenopteran endoparasite (Microplitis croceipes). Plant Biotechnol J 1:209–219Google Scholar