Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Detection and partial molecular characterization of atypical plum pox virus isolates from naturally infected sour cherry

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Archives of Virology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Atypical isolates of plum pox virus (PPV) were discovered in naturally infected sour cherry in urban ornamental plantings in Moscow, Russia. The isolates were detected by polyclonal double antibody sandwich ELISA and RT-PCR using universal primers specific for the 3′-non-coding and coat protein (CP) regions of the genome but failed to be recognized by triple antibody sandwich ELISA with the universal monoclonal antibody 5B and by RT-PCR using primers specific to for PPV strains D, M, C and W. Sequence analysis of the CP genes of nine isolates revealed 99.2-100 % within-group identity and 62-85 % identity to conventional PPV strains. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the atypical isolates represent a group that is distinct from the known PPV strains. Alignment of the N-terminal amino acid sequences of CP demonstrated their close similarity to those of a new tentative PPV strain, CR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Garcia JA, Cambra M (2007) Plum pox virus and sharka disease. Plant Viruses 1:69–79

    Google Scholar 

  2. Serce CU, Candresse T, Svanella-Dumas L, Krizbai L, Gazela M, Caglayan K (2009) Further characterization of a new recombinant group of plum pox virus isolates, PPV-T, found in orchards in the Ankara province of Turkey. Virus Res 142:121–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Llácer G, Cambra M (2006) Hosts and symptoms of plum pox virus: fruiting Prunus species. EPPO Bull 36:219–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. James D, Thompson D (2006) Hosts and symptoms of plum pox virus: ornamental and wild Prunus species. EPPO Bull 36:222–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalashyan YA, Bilkey ND, Verderevskaya TD, Rubina EV (1994) Plum pox potyvirus on sour cherry in Moldavia. EPPO Bull 24:645–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Crescenzi A, Nuzzaci M, Levy L, Piazzolla P, Hadidi A (1995) Plum pox virus (PPV) in sweet cherry. Acta Hortic 386:219–225

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nemchinov L, Hadidi A, Maiss E, Cambra M, Candresse T, Damsteegt V (1996) Sour cherry strain of plum pox potyvirus (PPV): molecular and serological evidence for a new subgroup of PPV strains. Phytopathology 86:1215–1221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Crescenzi A, d’Aquino L, Comes S, Nuzzaci M, Piazzolla P (1997) Characterization of the sweet cherry isolate of plum pox virus. Plant Dis 81:711–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nemchinov L, Crescenzi A, Hadidi A, Piazzolla P, Verderevskaya T (1998) Present status of the new cherry subgroup of plum pox virus (PPV-C). In: Hadidi A, Khetarpal RK, Kogazenava H (eds) Plant virus disease control. APS Press, St. Paul, pp 629–638

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fanigliulo A, Comes S, Maiss E, Piazzolla P, Crescenzi A (2003) The complete nucleotide sequence of plum pox virus isolates from sweet (PPV-SwC) and sour (PPV-SoC) cherry and their taxonomic relationships within the species. Arch Virol 148:2137–2153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Glasa M, Prichodko Y, Zhivaeva T, Shneider Y, Predajna L, Subr Z, Candresse T (2012) Complete and partial genome sequences of the unusual plum pox virus (PPV) isolates from sour cherry in Russia suggest their classification to a new PPV strain. In: 22nd International conference on virus and other transmissible disease of fruit crops (ICVF), Rome, p 37, 3–8 June 2012

  12. Sheveleva A, Ivanov P, Prihodko Y, James D, Chirkov S (2012) Occurrence and genetic diversity of Winona-like plum pox virus isolates in Russia. Plant Dis 96:1135–1142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Levy L, Hadidi AA (1994) Simple and rapid method for processing tissue infected with plum pox potyvirus for use with specific 3′ non-coding region RT-PCR assays. EPPO Bull 24:595–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wetzel T, Candresse T, Macquaire G, Ravelonandro M, Dunez J (1992) A polymerase chain reaction assay adapted to plum pox virus detection. J Virol Methods 33:355–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cambra M, Boscia D, Myrta A, Palkovich L, Navratil M, Barba M, Gorris MT, Capote N (2006) Detection and characterization of plum pox virus: serological methods. EPPO Bull 36:254–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Olmos A, Capote N, Candresse T (2006) Detection and characterization of plum pox virus: molecular methods. EPPO Bull 36:262–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Subr ZW, Glasa M (2008) Plum pox virus variability detected by the advanced analytical methods. Acta Virologica 52:75–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Olmos A, Cambra M, Dasi MA, Candresse T, Esteban O, Gorris MT, Asensio M (1997) Simultaneous detection and typing of plum pox potyvirus (PPV) isolates by hemi-nested PCR and PCR-ELISA. J Virol Methods 68:127–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nemchinov L, Hadidi A (1998) Specific oligonucleotide primers for the direct detection of plum pox potyvirus-cherry subgroup. J Virol Methods 70:231–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. James D, Varga A (2004) Preliminary molecular characterization of plum pox virus isolate W3174: evidence of a new strain. Acta Hortic 657:177–182

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Glasa M, Malinowski T, Predajna L, Pupola N, Dekena D, Michalczuk L, Candresse T (2011) Sequence variability, recombination analysis and specific detection of the W strain of plum pox virus. Phytopathology 101:980–985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Matic S, Elmaghraby I, Law V, Varga A, Reed C, Myrta A, James D (2011) Serological and molecular characterization of isolates of plum pox virus strain El Amar to better understand its diversity, evolution and unique geographical distribution. J Plant Pathol 93:303–310

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Martinez HM (1983) An efficient method for finding repeats in molecular sequences. Nucl Acids Res 11:4629–4634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lipman DJ, Pearson WR (1985) Rapid and sensitive protein similarity searches. Science 227:1435–1441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstruction phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kishino H, Hasegawa M (1989) Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in hominoidea. J Mol Evol 29:170–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Robaglia C, Durand-Tardif M, Tronchet M, Boudazin G, Astier-Manifacier S, Casse-Delbart F (1989) Nucleotide sequence of potato virus Y (N strain) genomic RNA. J Gen Virol 70:935–947

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wetzel T, Candresse T, Ravelonandro M, Delbos RP, Mazyad H, Aboul-Ata AE, Dunez J (1991) Nucleotide sequence of the 3′-terminal region of the RNA of the El Amar strain of plum pox potyvirus. J Gen Virol 72:1741–1746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Candresse T, Saenz P, Garcia JA, Boscia D, Navratil M, Gorris MT, Cambra M (2011) Analysis of the epitope structure of plum pox virus coat protein. Phytopathology 101:611–619

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Delano James for critical reading of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergei Chirkov.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Fig. S1 Symptoms observed in the plant infected with the PPV isolate Pul-DS (JPEG 1.96 MB)

705_2013_1630_MOESM2_ESM.tif

Fig. S2 (A, B, C) Analysis of the PPV isolates from sour cherry by IC-RT-PCR with 3′NCR-specific primers (A), P1/P2 primers (B) and PPV-CR-specific primers (C). PC – universal positive control (Agritest); nc1 and nc2 – negative controls (healthy cherry and Agritest, respectively). M – GeneRuler Plus 100 bp DNA ladder (Fermentas). There was no positive control in PCR using PPV-CR-specific primers (C) (TIFF 5250 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chirkov, S., Ivanov, P. & Sheveleva, A. Detection and partial molecular characterization of atypical plum pox virus isolates from naturally infected sour cherry. Arch Virol 158, 1383–1387 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-013-1630-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-013-1630-x

Keywords

Navigation