Agel L, Barlow M, Polonia J, Coe D (2020) Simulation of northeast US extreme precipitation and its associated circulation by CMIP5 models. J Clim 33:9817–9834
Anscombe FJ, 1973: Graphs in statistical analysis. The american statistician, 27, 17–21 %@ 0003–1305.
Brekke LD, Dettinger MD, Maurer EP, Anderson M (2008) Significance of model credibility in estimating climate projection distributions for regional hydroclimatological risk assessments. Clim Change 89:371–394
Bürger G, Murdock T, Werner A, Sobie S, Cannon A (2012) Downscaling extremes—an intercomparison of multiple statistical methods for present climate. J Clim 25:4366–4388
Cannon AJ, Sobie SR, Murdock TQ (2015) Bias correction of GCM precipitation by quantile mapping: how well do methods preserve changes in quantiles and extremes? J Clim 28:6938–6959
Change IC, 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2013. There is no corresponding record for this reference.[Google Scholar], 33–118.
Chen J, Brissette FP, Chaumont D, Braun M (2013) Performance and uncertainty evaluation of empirical downscaling methods in quantifying the climate change impacts on hydrology over two North American river basins. J Hydrol 479:200–214
Daly C, Bryant K (2013) The PRISM climate and weather system—an introduction. PRISM climate group, Corvallis
Eden JM, Widmann M, Maraun D, Vrac M (2014) Comparison of GCM- and RCM-simulated precipitation following stochastic postprocessing. J Geophys Res Atmos 119(11):040–011, 053
Evans JP, Ji F, Abramowitz G, Ekström M (2013) Optimally choosing small ensemble members to produce robust climate simulations. Environ Res Lett 8:044050
Flato, G., and Coauthors, 2014: Evaluation of climate models. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 741–866.
Friedlingstein P, Meinshausen M, Arora VK, Jones CD, Anav A, Liddicoat SK, Knutti R (2014) Uncertainties in CMIP5 climate projections due to carbon cycle feedbacks. J Clim 27:511–526
Gudmundsson L, Bremnes JB, Haugen JE, Engen-Skaugen T (2012) Downscaling RCM precipitation to the station scale using statistical transformations–a comparison of methods. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:3383–3390
Gulizia C, Camilloni I (2015) Comparative analysis of the ability of a set of CMIP3 and CMIP5 global climate models to represent precipitation in South America. Int J Climatol 35:583–595
Hawkins E, Sutton R (2009) The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions. Bull Am Meteor Soc 90:1095–1108
Hayhoe K, Coauthors (2006) Past and future changes in climate and hydrological indicators in the US Northeast. Clim Dyn 28:381–407
Hempel S, Frieler K, Warszawski L, Schewe J, Piontek F, 2013: A trend-preserving bias correction–the ISI-MIP approach.
Hidalgo HG, Alfaro EJ (2012) Global model selection for evaluation of climate change projections in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Seascape. Rev Biol Trop 60:67–81
Hidalgo HG, Alfaro EJ (2015) Skill of CMIP5 climate models in reproducing 20th century basic climate features in Central America. Int J Climatol 35:3397–3421
Hodgkins GA, Dudley RW (2006) Changes in late-winter snowpack depth, water equivalent, and density in Maine, 1926–2004. Hydrol Process 20:741–751
Hodgkins GA, Dudley RW, 2006b: Changes in the timing of winter–spring streamflows in eastern North America, 1913–2002. Geophys Res Lett 33.
Hodgkins GA, James IC, Huntington TG (2002) Historical changes in lake ice-out dates as indicators of climate change in New England, 1850–2000. Int J Climatol 22:1819–1827
Hodgkins GA, Dudley RW, Huntington TG (2003) Changes in the timing of high river flows in New England over the 20th century. J Hydrol 278:244–252
Immerzeel W, Pellicciotti F, Bierkens M (2013) Rising river flows throughout the twenty-first century in two Himalayan glacierized watersheds. Nat Geosci 6:742–745
Karmalkar AV, Horton RM (2021) Drivers of exceptional coastal warming in the northeastern United States. Nat Clim Chang 11:854–860
Kjellström E, Boberg F, Castro M, Christensen JH, Nikulin G, Sánchez E (2010) Daily and monthly temperature and precipitation statistics as performance indicators for regional climate models. Clim Res 44:135–150
Knutti R, Sedláček J (2012) Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections. Nat Clim Chang 3:369–373
Knutti R, Masson D, Gettelman A (2013) Climate model genealogy: generation CMIP5 and how we got there. Geophys Res Lett 40:1194–1199
Kunkel K, Coauthors, 2022: State climate summaries for the United States 2022. NOAA Technical Report NESDIS 150.
Liu J, Song M, Horton RM, Hu Y (2013) Reducing spread in climate model projections of a September ice-free Arctic. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:12571–12576
Lutz AF, ter Maat HW, Biemans H, Shrestha AB, Wester P, Immerzeel WW (2016) Selecting representative climate models for climate change impact studies: an advanced envelope-based selection approach. Int J Climatol 36:3988–4005
Maraun D (2013) Bias correction, quantile mapping, and downscaling: revisiting the inflation issue. J Clim 26:2137–2143
Maurer EP, Pierce DW (2014) Bias correction can modify climate model simulated precipitation changes without adverse effect on the ensemble mean. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:915–925
McSweeney CF, Jones RG (2016) How representative is the spread of climate projections from the 5 CMIP5 GCMs used in ISI-MIP? Clim Serv 1:24–29
Pennell C, Reichler T (2011) On the effective number of climate models. J Clim 24:2358–2367
Perkins SE, Pitman AJ, Holbrook NJ, McAneney J (2007) Evaluation of the AR4 climate models’ simulated daily maximum temperature, minimum temperature, and precipitation over Australia using probability density functions. J Clim 20:4356–4376
Peterson T (2005) Climate Change Indices. WMO Bull 54:83–86
Pierce DW, Barnett TP, Santer BD, Gleckler PJ (2009) Selecting global climate models for regional climate change studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:8441–8446
Pincus R, Batstone CP, Hofmann RJP, Taylor KE, Glecker PJ, 2008: Evaluating the present‐day simulation of clouds, precipitation, and radiation in climate models. J Geophys Re Atmos 113.
Rosen RA, Guenther E (2015) The economics of mitigating climate change: what can we know? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 91:93–106
Ruane AC, SP McDermid, 2017: Selection of a representative subset of global climate models that captures the profile of regional changes for integrated climate impacts assessment. Earth Perspect 4.
Rupp DE, Abatzoglou JT, Hegewisch KC, Mote PW (2013) Evaluation of CMIP5 20th century climate simulations for the Pacific Northwest USA. J Geophys Res Atmos 118(10):884–810, 906
San José R, Pérez JL, González RM, Pecci J, Garzón A, Palacios M (2016) Impacts of the 4.5 and 8.5 RCP global climate scenarios on urban meteorology and air quality: application to Madrid, Antwerp, Milan, Helsinki and London. J Comput Appl Math 293:192–207
Sánchez E, Romera R, Gaertner MA, Gallardo C, Castro M (2009) A weighting proposal for an ensemble of regional climate models over Europe driven by 1961–2000 ERA40 based on monthly precipitation probability density functions. Atmos Sci Lett 10:241–248
Sillmann J, Kharin V, Zhang X, Zwiers F, Bronaugh D (2013a) Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 1. Model evaluation in the present climate. J Geophys Res Atmos 118:1716–1733
Sillmann J, Kharin VV, Zwiers F, Zhang X, Bronaugh D (2013b) Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 2. Future climate projections. J Geophys Res Atmos 118:2473–2493
Sorg A, Huss M, Rohrer M, Stoffel M (2014) The days of plenty might soon be over in glacierized Central Asian catchments. Environ Res Lett 9:104018
Sunyer MA, Coauthors (2014) Inter-comparison of statistical downscaling methods for projection of extreme precipitation in Europe. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 11:6167–6214
Taylor KE (2001) Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. J Geophys Res Atmos 106:7183–7192
Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteor Soc 93:485–498
Teutschbein C, Seibert J (2012) Bias correction of regional climate model simulations for hydrological climate-change impact studies: review and evaluation of different methods. J Hydrol 456:12–29
Teutschbein C, Seibert J (2013) Is bias correction of regional climate model (RCM) simulations possible for non-stationary conditions? Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:5061–5077
Themeßl MJ, Gobiet A, Heinrich G (2012) Empirical-statistical downscaling and error correction of regional climate models and its impact on the climate change signal. Clim Change 112:449–468
Tu J (2009) Combined impact of climate and land use changes on streamflow and water quality in eastern Massachusetts, USA. J Hydrol 379:268–283
Van Vuuren DP, Coauthors, 2011: The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Change, 109(5)
Warszawski L, Frieler K, Huber V, Piontek F, Serdeczny O, Schewe J (2014) The inter-sectoral impact model intercomparison project (ISI-MIP): project framework. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:3228–3232
Willems P, Vrac M (2011) Statistical precipitation downscaling for small-scale hydrological impact investigations of climate change. J Hydrol 402:193–205