Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of re-analyses over China based on the temporal asymmetry of daily temperature variability

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As an intrinsic feature of daily surface air temperature (SAT) variability found in station measurements, temporal asymmetry (TA) can be taken as an evaluation metric to access the quality of SAT re-analysis product. In this study, TA calculated from four SAT variables, i.e., daily mean SAT (Tmean), daily maximum SAT (Tmax), daily minimum SAT (Tmin) and diurnal temperature range (TDTR = Tmax − Tmin), is applied to evaluate synoptic-scale performance of four reanalysis products (NCEP-2, JRA-55, ERA-I, and ERA-5) over China. The results show that four re-analyses overall overestimate the TA of daily Tmax and Tmin variability over China, but with a comparatively consistent estimated TA for Tmean. Moreover, the TA of Tmean variability for these four re-analyses shares high spatial consistency with those from the observation. However, four re-analyses own the similar region-dependent spatial patterns of overestimated TA for Tmax and Tmin variability, especially for Tmax. Since high TA is an indicator for strong nonlinear feature, only Tmean reanalysis is the most suitable to explore synoptic-scale extreme events, such as heat waves and cold waves, which are highly related to the strong nonlinear processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All observed records for these four temperature variables were downloaded from the China meteorological data sharing service system (http://cdc.cma.gov.cn). Reanalysis NCEP-2 products were acquired from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and its website at http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd. JRA-55 is produced by the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) (https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/jra-55). From the ECMWF’s website: https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets/browse-reanalysis-datasets, both ERA-I, and ERA-5 are downloaded.

References

  • Alfred M, Powell Jr, Xu JJ (2011) A new assessment of the mid-1970s abrupt atmospheric temperature change in the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis and associated solar forcing implications. Theor Appl Climatol 104:443–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alghamdi AS (2020) Evaluation of four reanalysis datasets against radiosonde over Southwest Asia. Atmosphere 11:402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashkenazy Y, Tziperman E (2004) Are the 41 kyr glacial oscillations a linear response to Milankovitch forcing? Quat Sci Rev 23:1879–1890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashkenazy Y, Feliks Y, Gildor H, Tziperman E (2008) Asymmetry of daily temperature records. J Atmos Sci 65:3327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashkenazy Y, Fredj E et al (2016) Current temporal asymmetry and the role of tides: Nan-Wan Bay vs. the Gulf of Elat. Ocean Sci 12:733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayataka E et al (2011) The Japanese 55-year reanalysis “JRA-55”: an interim report. SOLA 7:149–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartos I, Jánosi IM (2005) Atmospheric response function over land: strong asymmetries in daily temperature fluctuations. Geophys Res Lett 32:L23820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson L, Shukla J (1988) Integration of space and in situ observations to study global climate change. Bull Am Meteor Soc 69:1130–1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisgaard S, Kulahci M (2011) Time series analysis and forecasting by example. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chen GX, Iwasaki T (2014) Evaluation of the warm-season diurnal variability over East Asia in recent reanalyses JRA-55, ERA-interim, NCEP CFSR, and NASA MERRA. J Clim 27:5517–5537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Liu Z (2016) Global water vapor variability and trend from the latest 36 year (1979 to 2014) data of ECMWF and NCEP reanalyses, radiosonde, GPS, and microwave satellite. J Geophys Res 121:11442–11462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornes RC, Jones PD (2013) How well does the ERA-interim reanalysis replicate trends in extremes of surface temperature across Europe? J Geophys Res 118:10262–10276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dee DP, Coauthors (2011) The ERA-interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc 137:553–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaconescu EP, Mailhot A, Brown R, Chaumont D (2018) Evaluation of CORDEX-Arctic daily precipitation and temperature based climate indices over Canadian Arctic land areas. Clim Dyn 50(5–6):2061–2085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flocas HA, Tolika K, Anagnostopoulou C, Patrikas I, Maheras P, Vafiadis M (2005) Evaluation of maximum and minimum temperature of NCEP-NCAR reanalysis data over Greece. Theor Appl Climatol 80:49–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyure B, Bartos I, Janosi IM (2007) Nonlinear statistics of daily temperature fluctuations reproduced in a laboratory experiment. Phys Rev E 76:037301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He WP, Zhao SS (2018) Assessment of the quality of NCEP-2 and CFSR reanalysis daily temperature in China based on long-range correlation. Clim Dyn 50:493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich H (2004) Origin and consequences of cyclic ice rafting in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean during the past 130,000 years. Quat Res 29:142–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P et al (2020) The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc 146:1999–2049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Fu ZT (2019) Enhanced time series predictability with well-defined structures. Theor Appl Climatol 138:373–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y et al (2020) Systematic identification of causal relations in high-dimensional chaotic systems: application to stratosphere-troposphere coupling. Clim Dyn 55:2469–2481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamitsu M et al (2002) NCEP-DOE AMIP-II reanalysis (R-2). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83:1631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King T (1996) Quantifying nonlinearity and geometry in time series of climate. Quat Sci Rev 15:247–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi S, Ota Y, Harada Y, Ebita A, Moriya M, Onoda H, Onogi K, Kamahori H, Kobayashi C, Endo H, Miyaoka K, Takahashi K (2015) The JRA-55 reanalysis: general specifications and basic characteristics. J Metorol Soc Jpn 93:5–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koscielny-Bunde E, Bunde A, Havlin S, Roman HE (1998) Indication of a universal persistence law governing atmospheric variability. Phys Rev Lett 81:729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacasa L, Nunez A, Roldan E, Parrondo JMR, Luque B (2012) Time series irreversibility: a visibility graph approach. Eur Phys J B 85:217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li RC, Huang Y, Xie FH, Fu ZT (2021) Discrepancies in surface temperature between reanalysis and station observations over China and their implications. Atmos Oceanic Sci Lett 14:100008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisiecki LE, Raymo ME (2005) A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic delta O-18 records. Paleoceanography 20:PA1003

    Google Scholar 

  • Livina V, Ashkenazy Y, Kizner Z, Strygin V, Bunde A, Havlin S (2003) A stochastic model of river discharge fluctuations. Phys A 330:283–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma L, Zhang T, Li Q, Frauenfeld OW, Qin D (2008) Evaluation of ERA-40, NCEP-1, and NCEP-2 reanalysis air temperatures with ground-based measurements in China. J Geophys Res 113:D15115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao J, Shi X, Ma L, Kaiser DP, Li Q, Thornton PE (2010) Assessment of reanalysis daily extreme temperatures with China’s homogenized historical dataset during 1979-2001 using probability density functions. J Clim 23:6605–6623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques CAF, Rocha A, Corte-Real J (2010) Comparative energetics of ERA-40, JRA-25 and NCEPR2 reanalysis, in the wave number domain. Dyn Atmos Oceans 50:375–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney PA, Mulligan FJ, Fealy R (2011) Comparison of ERA-40, ERA-interim and NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data with observed surface air temperature over Ireland. Int J Climatol 31:545–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendergrass AG, Knutti R (2018) The uneven nature of daily precipitation and its change. Geophys Res Lett 45(21):11980–11988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro HR et al (2020) An intercomparison of subtropical cut-off lows in the southern hemisphere using recent reanalyses: ERA-interim, NCEP-CFRS, MERRA-2, JRA-55, and JRA-25. Clim Dyn 54:777–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piskala V, Huth R (2020) Asymmetry of day-to-day temperature changes and its causes. Theor Appl Climatol 140(4):683–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitman AJ, Perkins SE (2009) Global and regional comparison of daily 2-m and 1000-hPa maximum and minimum temperatures in three global reanalysis. J Clim 22:4667–4681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quan H, Chai WM, Fu ZT (2021) Asymmetry of daily mean temperature series over China and its frontal mechanism. Int J Climatol 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7338

  • Radu CR, Rozum I, Schepers D, Simmons A, Soci C, Dee D, Thépaut JN (2018) ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1979 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS). (Accessed on < 26-02-2021 >), https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47

  • Raghavendra A, Dai AG, Milrad SM, Cloutier-Bisbee SR (2018) Floridian heatwaves and extreme precipitation-future climate projections. Clim Dyn 52:495–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roldan E, Parrondo JMR (2010) Estimating dissipation from single stationary trajectories. Phys Rev Lett 105:150607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusticucci MM, Kousky E (2002) A comparative study of maximum and minimum temperatures over Argentina: NCEP-NCAR reanalysis versus station data. J Clim 15:2089–2101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber T, Schmitz A (2000) Surrogate time series Phys D 142:346–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi M (2017) Comparison of large-scale dynamical variability in the extratropical stratosphere among the JRA-55 family data sets: impacts of assimilation of observational data in JRA-55 reanalysis data. Atmos Chem Phys 17:11193–11207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor KE (2001) Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. J Geophys Res 106:7183–7192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth KE, Olson JG (1988) An evaluation and intercomparison of global analyses from national meteorological center and the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecast. Bull Am Meteor Soc 69:1047–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Zhang M, Sum M, Wang B, Huang X, Wang Q, Feng F (2015) Comparison of surface air temperature derived from NCEP/DOE R2, ERA-interim, and observations in the arid northwestern China: a consideration of altitude errors. Theor Appl Climatol 119:99–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie FH, Fu ZT, Piao L, Mao JY (2016) Time irreversibility of mean temperature anomaly variations over China. Theor Appl Climatol 123:161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie FH, Nian D, Fu ZT (2019) Differential temporal asymmetry among different temperature variables’ daily fluctuations. Clim Dyn 53:585–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang LC, Franzke CL, Fu ZT (2020) Power-law behaviour of hourly precipitation intensity and dry spell duration over the United States. Int J Climatol 40:2429–2444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye ZQ, Hsieh WW (2008) Enhancing predictability by increasing nonlinearity in ENSO and Lorenz systems. Nonlin Processes Geophys 15:793–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You Q, Kang S, Aguilar E, Pepin N, Flugel W, Yan Y, Xu Y, Zhang Y, Huang J (2011) Changes in daily climate extremes in China and their connection to the large scale atmospheric circulation during 1961-2003. Clim Dyn 36:2399–2417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You Q, Fraedrich K, Min J, Kang S, Zhu X, Ren G, Meng X (2013) Can temperature extremes in China be calculated from reanalysis? Glob Planet Change 111:268–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang BE, Xie FH, Fu ZH, Fu ZT (2019) Comparative study of multiple measures on temporal irreversibility of daily air temperature anomaly variations over China. Phys A 523:1387–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao SS, He WP, Jiang YD (2018) Evaluation of NCEP-2 and CFSR reanalysis seasonal temperature data in China using detrended fluctuation analysis. Int J Climatol 38:252–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Huang D, Yan P, Huang Y, Kuang X (2017) Can reanalysis datasets describe the persistent temperature and precipitation extremes over China? Theor Appl Climatol 130:655–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Code availability

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China through Grants (Nos. 41475048 and 41975059).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study design: Zuntao Fu, Wenmi Chai; data collection: Wenmi Chai; statistical analysis: Wenmi Chai; result interpretation: Zuntao Fu, Wenmi Chai; manuscript preparation, and review: Wenmi Chai, Yu Huang, Lichao Yang, Heng Quan, and Zuntao Fu.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zuntao Fu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

We confirm that this article is an original research and has not been published or presented previously in any journal or conference in any language (in whole or in part).

Consent to participate and consent for publication

We have consent to participate and publish.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key points

• Four re-analyses all overestimate the temporal asymmetry of daily maximum and minimum temperature variability over China.

• For overestimated temporal asymmetry, four re-analyses own the similar region-dependent spatial patterns.

• Daily mean air temperature variability of re-analyses is the most suitable for extreme event study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chai, W., Huang, Y., Yang, L. et al. Evaluation of re-analyses over China based on the temporal asymmetry of daily temperature variability. Theor Appl Climatol 147, 753–765 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03839-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03839-y

Navigation