Abstract
The Hanjiang River is the source of water for the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project. So a reasonable evaluation on water resources future changes in the Hanjiang River Basin (HRB) is essential to ensure its water safety. In this study, we firstly evaluated the China meteorological forcing dataset (CMFD), and then used it to measure the applicability of the eight global climate models (GCMs). Finally, the empirical orthogonal function (EOF) and clustering algorithms were used to analyze the spatial distribution status of precipitation in the HRB. The results showed that the BCC-CSM2-MR model has the best effect, followed by the IPSL-CM6A-LR model. In the SSP126, SSP245, SSP370, and SSP585 scenarios, total precipitation in the HRB all shows an increasing trend. However, the difference in the spatial distribution of precipitation intensified, for the upstream and downstream tended to be wetter, while the middle reaches had less precipitation. In the future climate scenarios, the areas with more precipitation (Class 1) increased significantly, while the areas with medium precipitation (Class 3) decreased significantly, which will enlarge the precipitation difference between regions in the HRB. The increase in the total amount of precipitation, coupled with the increase in the spatial heterogeneity of precipitation, will make the HRB more vulnerable to flooding disasters. Therefore, the water resources management measures in the HRB should be strengthened in the future.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The CMIP6 data was used for the study and downloaded from http://esgf-node.llnl.gov that was freely available for users.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Alizadeh MJ, Nourani V, Kavianpour MR (2021) A statistical framework to project wave climate and energy potential in the Caspian Sea: application of CMIP6 scenarios. Int J Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03314-1
Almazroui M, Islam MN, Saeed F, Saeed S, Ismail M, Ehsan MA, Diallo I, O’Brien E, Ashfaq M, Martínez-Castro D, Cavazos T, Cerezo-Mota R, Tippett MK, Gutowski WJ, Alfaro EJ, Hidalgo HG, Vichot-Llano A, Campbell JD, Kamil S, Rashid IU, Sylla MB, Stephenson T, Taylor M, Barlow M (2021) Projected changes in temperature and precipitation over the United States, Central America, and the Caribbean in CMIP6 GCMs. Earth Syst Environ 5:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-021-00199-5
Ayugi B, Ngoma H, Babaousmail H, Karim R, Iyakaremye V, Lim Kam Sian KTC, Ongoma V (2021) Evaluation and projection of mean surface temperature using CMIP6 models over East Africa. J. African Earth Sci. 181, 104226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2021.104226
Bağçaci SÇ, Yucel I, Duzenli E, Yilmaz MT (2021) Intercomparison of the expected change in the temperature and the precipitation retrieved from CMIP6 and CMIP5 climate projections: A Mediterranean hot spot case. Turkey Atmos Res 256:105576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105576
Beck S, Oomen J (2021) Imagining the corridor of climate mitigation – What is at stake in IPCC’s politics of anticipation? Environ Sci Policy 123:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.05.011
Cavanagh RD, Trathan PN, Hill SL, Melbourne-Thomas J, Meredith MP, Hollyman P, Krafft BA, MC Muelbert M, Murphy EJ, Sommerkorn M, Turner J, Grant SM (2021) Utilising IPCC assessments to support the ecosystem approach to fisheries management within a warming Southern Ocean. Mar. Policy 131, 104589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104589
Chen C-A, Hsu H-H, Liang H-C (2021) Evaluation and comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 model performance in simulating the seasonal extreme precipitation in the Western North Pacific and East Asia. Weather Clim Extrem 31:100303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2021.100303
Djalante R (2019) Key assessments from the IPCC special report on global warming of 1.5 °C and the implications for the Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction. Prog Disaster Sci. 1, 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100001
do Nascimento Neto JF, da Mota AJ, Roque RA, Heinrichs-Caldas W, Tadei WP (2020) Analysis of the transcription of genes encoding heat shock proteins (hsp) in Aedes aegypti Linnaeus, 1762 (Diptera: Culicidae), maintained under climatic conditions provided by the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change) for the year 2100. Infect Genet Evol 86, 104626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104626
Gu X, Zhang Q, Li J, Chen D, Singh VP, Zhang Y, Liu J, Shen Z, Yu H (2020) Impacts of anthropogenic warming and uneven regional socio-economic development on global river flood risk. J Hydrol 590:125262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125262
Guo H, Bao A, Chen T, Zheng G, Wang Y, Jiang L, De Maeyer P (2021a) Assessment of CMIP6 in simulating precipitation over arid Central Asia. Atmos Res 252:105451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105451
Guo Z, Shi Y, Huang F, Fan X, Huang J (2021b) Landslide susceptibility zonation method based on C5.0 decision tree and K-means cluster algorithms to improve the efficiency of risk management. Geosci. Front. 12, 101249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101249
Gupta V, Singh V, Jain MK (2020) Assessment of precipitation extremes in India during the 21st century under SSP1–1.9 mitigation scenarios of CMIP6 GCMs. J Hydrol. 590, 125422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125422
Iqbal Z, Shahid S, Ahmed K, Ismail T, Ziarh GF, Chung E-S, Wang X (2021) Evaluation of CMIP6 GCM rainfall in mainland Southeast Asia. Atmos Res 254:105525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105525
Jia B, Wang L, Wang Y, Li R, Luo X, Xie J, Xie Z, Chen S, Qin P, Li L, Chen K (2021) CAS-LSM datasets for the CMIP6 land surface snow and soil moisture model intercomparison project. Adv Atmos Sci 38:862–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-0293-x
Jiang W, Wang L, Zhang M, Yao R, Chen X, Gui X, Sun J, Cao Q (2021) Analysis of drought events and their impacts on vegetation productivity based on the integrated surface drought index in the Hanjiang River Basin. China Atmos Res 254:105536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105536
Jin J, Zhang H, Dong X, Liu H, Zhang M, Gao X, He J, Chai Z, Zeng Q, Zhou G, Lin Z, Yu Yi, Lin P, Lian R, Yu Y, Song M, Zhang D (2021) CAS-ESM2.0 model datasets for the CMIP6 flux-anomaly-forced model intercomparison project (FAFMIP). Adv Atmos Sci 38:296–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-0188-2
Jing J, Ke S, Li T, Wang T (2021) Energy method of geophysical logging lithology based on K-means dynamic clustering analysis. Environ Technol Innov 23:101534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.101534
Kim Y-H, Min S-K, Zhang X, Sillmann J, Sandstad M (2020) Evaluation of the CMIP6 multi-model ensemble for climate extreme indices. Weather Clim Extrem 29:100269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2020.100269
Lai C, Chen X, Wang Z, Yu H, Bai X (2020) Flood risk assessment and regionalization from past and future perspectives at basin scale. Risk Anal 40:1399–1417. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13493
Lai C, Zhong R, Wang Z, Wu X, Chen X, Wang P, Lian Y (2019) Monitoring hydrological drought using long-term satellite-based precipitation data. Sci Total Environ 649:1198–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.245
Leitold R, Garschagen M, Tran V, Diez JR (2021) Flood risk reduction and climate change adaptation of manufacturing firms: global knowledge gaps and lessons from Ho Chi Minh City. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 102351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102351
Li J, Wang Z, Lai C (2020a) Severe drought events inducing large decrease of net primary productivity in mainland China during 1982–2015. Sci Total Environ 703:135541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135541
Li S-Y, Miao L-J, Jiang Z-H, Wang G-J, Gnyawali KR, Zhang J, Zhang H, Fang K, He Y, Li C (2020b) Projected drought conditions in Northwest China with CMIP6 models under combined SSPs and RCPs for 2015–2099. Adv Clim Chang Res 11:210–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2020.09.003
Li Y, Yan D, Peng H, Xiao S (2021) Evaluation of precipitation in CMIP6 over the Yangtze River Basin. Atmos Res 253:105406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105406
Liu YR, Li YP, Yang X, Huang GH, Li YF (2021) Development of an integrated multivariate trend-frequency analysis method: Spatial-temporal characteristics of climate extremes under global warming for Central Asia. Environ Res 195:110859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.110859
Lucas A (2021) Risking the earth Part 1: Reassessing dangerous anthropogenic interference and climate risk in IPCC processes. Clim Risk Manag 31:100257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2020.100257
Ma Q, Zhang Q, Wang Q, Yuan X, Yuan R, Luo C (2021) A comparative study of EOF and NMF analysis on downward trend of AOD over China from 2011 to 2019. Environ Pollut 288:117713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117713
Misra S, Sarkar S, Mitra P (2018) Statistical downscaling of precipitation using long short-term memory recurrent neural networks. Theor Appl Climatol 134:1179–1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2307-2
Mohanty MP, Simonovic SP (2021) Changes in floodplain regimes over Canada due to climate change impacts: Observations from CMIP6 models. Sci Total Environ. 148323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148323
Molla A, Zuo S, Zhang W, Qiu Y, Ren Y, Han J (2022) Optimal spatial sampling design for monitoring potentially toxic elements pollution on urban green space soil: A spatial simulated annealing and k-means integrated approach. Sci Total Environ 802:149728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149728
Mondal SK, Huang J, Wang Y, Su B, Zhai J, Tao H, Wang G, Fischer T, Wen S, Jiang T (2021) Doubling of the population exposed to drought over South Asia: CMIP6 multi-model-based analysis. Sci Total Environ 771:145186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145186
Monerie P-A, Wainwright CM, Sidibe M, Akinsanola AA (2020) Correction to: Model uncertainties in climate change impacts on Sahel precipitation in ensembles of CMIP5 and CMIP6 simulations. Clim Dyn 55:2309–2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05366-4
Pearce W, Mahony M, Raman S (2018) Science advice for global challenges: Learning from trade-offs in the IPCC. Environ Sci Policy 80:125–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.017
Rana S, McGregor J, Renwick J (2019) Dominant modes of winter precipitation variability over Central Southwest Asia and inter-decadal change in the ENSO teleconnection. Clim Dyn 53:5689–5707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04889-9
Rhoades AM, Risser MD, Stone DA, Wehner MF, Jones AD (2021) Implications of warming on western United States landfalling atmospheric rivers and their flood damages. Weather Clim Extrem 32:100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2021.100326
Rivera JA, Arnould G (2020) Evaluation of the ability of CMIP6 models to simulate precipitation over Southwestern South America: Climatic features and long-term trends (1901–2014). Atmos Res 241:104953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.104953
Shafeeque M, Luo Y (2021) A multi-perspective approach for selecting CMIP6 scenarios to project climate change impacts on glacio-hydrology with a case study in Upper Indus river basin. J Hydrol 599:126466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126466
Shi X, Chen J, Gu L, Xu C-Y, Chen H, Zhang L (2021) Impacts and socioeconomic exposures of global extreme precipitation events in 1.5 and 2.0 °C warmer climates. Sci Total Environ. 766, 142665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142665
Siegert M, Alley RB, Rignot E, Englander J, Corell R (2020) Twenty-first century sea-level rise could exceed IPCC projections for strong-warming futures. One Earth 3:691–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.11.002
Srivastava A, Grotjahn R, Ullrich PA (2020) Evaluation of historical CMIP6 model simulations of extreme precipitation over contiguous US regions. Weather Clim Extrem 29:100268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2020.100268
Tabari H (2021) Extreme value analysis dilemma for climate change impact assessment on global flood and extreme precipitation. J Hydrol 593:125932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125932
Tian J, Zhang Z, Ahmed Z, Zhang L, Su B, Tao H, Jiang T (2021) Projections of precipitation over China based on CMIP6 models. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 35:831–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01948-0
Wang T, Tu X, Singh VP, Chen X, Lin K (2021) Global data assessment and analysis of drought characteristics based on CMIP6. J Hydrol 596:126091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126091
Wang Z, Ye A, Wang L, Liu K, Cheng L (2019) Spatial and temporal characteristics of reference evapotranspiration and its climatic driving factors over China from 1979–2015. Agric Water Manag 213:1096–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.12.006
Wilhere GF (2021) A Paris-like agreement for biodiversity needs IPCC-like science. Glob Ecol Conserv 28:e01617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01617
Xu Y, Zhang X, Hao Z, Hao F, Li C (2021) Projections of future meteorological droughts in China under CMIP6 from a three-dimensional perspective. Agric Water Manag 252:106849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106849
Yazdandoost F, Moradian S, Izadi A, Aghakouchak A (2021) Evaluation of CMIP6 precipitation simulations across different climatic zones: Uncertainty and model intercomparison. Atmos Res 250:105369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105369
Zamani Y, Hashemi Monfared SA, Azhdari moghaddam M, Hamidianpour M, (2020) A comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 projections for precipitation to observational data: the case of Northeastern Iran. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 142, 1613–1623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03406-x
Zhai J, Mondal SK, Fischer T, Wang Y, Su B, Huang J, Tao H, Wang G, Ullah W, Uddin MJ (2020) Future drought characteristics through a multi-model ensemble from CMIP6 over South Asia. Atmos Res 246:105111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105111
Zhang M-L, Liu L, Li Q (2021) Modeling the global ionospheric electron densities based on the EOF decomposition of the ionospheric radio occultation observation. Adv Sp Res 68:2218–2232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.09.033
Zhang S, Li X (2021) Future projections of offshore wind energy resources in China using CMIP6 simulations and a deep learning-based downscaling method. Energy 217:119321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119321
Zhu Y-Y, Yang S (2020) Evaluation of CMIP6 for historical temperature and precipitation over the Tibetan Plateau and its comparison with CMIP5. Adv Clim Chang Res 11:239–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2020.08.001
Acknowledgements
The meteorological data used in this research was supported by CMA, and the GCMs data was supported by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Funding
The research is financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U1911204, 51861125203), National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC0405900), The Project for Creative Research from Guangdong Water Resources Department (Grant No. 2018, 2020).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Haoyu Jin: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Writing—original draft. Xiaohong Chen: Formal analysis, Conceptualization, Validation, Software, Project administration. Ruida Zhong: Writing-original draft, Writing-review & editing. Pan Wu: Resources, Funding acquisition, Writing—review & editing. Dan Li: Supervision. Haoyu Jin: Data curation. Xiaohong Chen: Writing-review & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jin, H., Chen, X., Zhong, R. et al. Spatio-temporal changes of precipitation in the Hanjiang River Basin under climate change. Theor Appl Climatol 146, 1441–1458 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03801-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03801-y