Abstract
There is a large agreement that global warming induces changes of precipitation regimes of different nature and amplitude depending on the timescale considered. This question is of special concern regarding extreme rainfall that might have critical socio-environmental consequences. A unified framework is proposed here for detecting trends in extreme rainfall. It is based on the GEV distribution, whose parameters depend both on a simple scaling formulation to account for multiple time durations of rainfall and on time to account for the non-stationarity deriving from climatic trends. The implementation of the model is illustrated in the Sahel region by analyzing 30 in situ rainfall series of 28 years measured at time-steps from 2 to 24 h. While the separate analysis of the point series proves inconclusive for detecting trends at any of the time-steps considered, the inclusion of all the series and time-steps into the proposed unified model allows trends to be detected at a high level of confidence (p-value < 1%). This trend essentially appears in the scale parameter of the regional GEV distribution, involving a 15 to 20% increase of the 10-year rainfall in 28 years, and a 23 to 30% increase of the 100-year rainfall. The main advantages of the proposed framework are (i) its parsimony, allowing for reducing the uncertainty associated with the model inference; (ii) its capacity for detecting trends either in the mean and/or in the variability of the extreme events; and (iii) its ability for producing non-stationary Intensity-Duration-Frequency curves that are coherent over a range of durations of accumulation.










Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Allan RP, Barlow M, Byrne MP, Cherchi A, Douville H, Fowler H, Gan TY, Pendergrass A, Rosenfeld D, Swann A, Wilcox LJ, Zolina O (2020) Advances in understanding large-scale responses of the water cycle to climate change. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14337
Allen MR, Ingram WJ (2002) Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle. Nature 419(6903):228–232. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01092
Alpert P, Ben-Gai T, Baharad A, Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D, Colacino M, Diodato L, Ramis C, Homar V, Romero R, Michaelides S, Manes A (2002) The paradoxical increase of Mediterranean extreme daily rainfall in spite of decrease in total values. Geophys Res Lett 29(11):1536. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013554
Balme M, Vischel T, Lebel T, Peugeot C, Galle S (2006) Assessing the water balance in the Sahel: Impact of small scale rainfall variability on runoff. J Hydrol 331 (1-2):336–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.05.020
Blanchet J, Davison AC (2011) Spatial modeling of extreme snow depth. Ann Appl Stat 5 (3):1699–1725. www.jstor.org/stable/23069351
Blanchet J, Ceresetti D, Molinié G, Creutin JD (2016) A regional GEV scale-invariant framework for Intensity–Duration–Frequency analysis. J Hydrol 540:82–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.007https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022169416303584
Bougadis J, Adamowski K (2006) Scaling model of a rainfall intensity-duration-frequency relationship. Hydrol Process 20(17):3747–3757. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6386
Cannon AJ (2010) A flexible nonlinear modelling framework for nonstationary generalized extreme value analysis in hydroclimatology. Hydrol Process 24(6):673–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7506
Cannon AJ, Innocenti S (2019) Projected intensification of sub-daily and daily rainfall extremes in convection-permitting climate model simulations over North America: implications for future intensity-duration-frequency curves. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 19(2):421–440. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-421-2019
Cheng L, AghaKouchak A (2015) Nonstationary precipitation intensity-duration-frequency curves for infrastructure design in a changing climate. Sci Rep 4(1):7093. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07093
Coles S (2001) An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values springer series in statistics. Springer, London, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3675-0
Donat MG, Alexander LV, Yang H, Durre I, Vose R, Dunn RJH, Willett KM, Aguilar E, Brunet M, Caesar J, Hewitson B, Jack C, Klein Tank AMG, Kruger AC, Marengo J, Peterson TC, Renom M, Oria Rojas C, Rusticucci M, Salinger J, Elrayah AS, Sekele SS, Srivastava AK, Trewin B, Villarroel C, Vincent LA, Zhai P, Zhang X, Kitching S (2013) Updated analyses of temperature and precipitation extreme indices since the beginning of the twentieth century: The HadEX2 dataset. J Geophys Res Atmos 118(5):2098–2118. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50150
Fisher RA, Tippett LHC (1928) Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest or smallest member of a sample. Math Proc Camb Philos Soc 24(2):180–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100015681
Fläschner D, Mauritsen T, Stevens B (2016) Understanding the intermodel spread in global-mean hydrological sensitivity. J Clim 29(2):801–817. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0351.1
Galle S, Grippa M, Peugeot C, Moussa IB, Cappelaere B, Demarty J, Mougin E, Panthou G, Adjomayi P, Agbossou E, Ba A, Boucher M, Cohard JM, Descloitres M, Descroix L, Diawara M, Dossou M, Favreau G, Gangneron F, Gosset M, Hector B, Hiernaux P, Issoufou BA, Kergoat L, Lawin E, Lebel T, Legchenko A, Abdou MM, Malam-Issa O, Mamadou O, Nazoumou Y, Pellarin T, Quantin G, Sambou B, Seghieri J, Séguis L, Vandervaere JP, Vischel T, Vouillamoz JM, Zannou A, Afouda S, Alhassane A, Arjounin M, Barral H, Biron R, Cazenave F, Chaffard V, Chazarin JP, Guyard H, Koné A, Mainassara I, Mamane A, Oi M, Ouani T, Soumaguel N, Wubda M, Ago E, Alle I, Allies A, Arpin-Pont F, Awessou B, Cassé C, Charvet G, Dardel C, Depeyre A, Diallo F, Do T, Fatras C, Frappart F, Gal L, Gascon T, Gibon F, Guiro I, Ingatan A, Kempf J, Kotchoni D, Lawson F, Leauthaud C, Louvet S, Mason E, Nguyen C, Perrimond B, Pierre C, Richard A, Robert E, Román-Cascón C, Velluet C, Wilcox C (2018) AMMA-CATCH, a critical zone observatory in west africa monitoring a region in transition. Vadose Zone J 17(1):0. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2018.03.0062
Giorgi F, Im ES, Coppola E, Diffenbaugh NS, Gao XJ, Mariotti L, Shi Y (2011) Higher hydroclimatic intensity with global warming. J Clim 24(20):5309–5324. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI3979.1
Gnedenko B (1943) Sur la distribution limite du terme maximum d’une serie aleatoire. Ann Math 44(3):423–453. https://doi.org/10.2307/1968974
Gupta VK, Waymire E (1990) Multiscaling properties of spatial rainfall and river flow distributions. J Geophys Res 95(D3):1999. https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD03p01999
Hosking JRM, Wallis JR, Wood EF (1985) Estimation of the generalized extreme-value distribution by the method of probability-weighted moments. Technometrics 27(3):251–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1985.10488049
Katz RW (2013) Statistical methods for nonstationary extremes. In: AghaKouchak A, Easterling D, Hsu K, Schubert S, Sorooshian S (eds) Extremes in a changing climate: detection, analysis and uncertainty. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4479-0_2. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 15–37
Katz RW, Brown BG (1992) Extreme events in a changing climate: Variability is more important than averages. Clim Chang 21(3):289–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139728
Katz RW, Parlange MB, Naveau P (2002) Statistics of extremes in hydrology. Adv Water Resour 25(8-12):1287–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(02)00056-8
Kharin V, Zwiers FW (2005) Estimating extremes in transient climate change simulations. J Clim 18(8):1156–1173. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3320.1
Kharin V, Zwiers FW, Zhang X, Hegerl G (2007) Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the IPCC ensemble of global coupled model simulations. J Clim 20(8):1419–1444. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI4066.1
Koutsoyiannis D, Kozonis D, Manetas A (1998) A mathematical framework for studying rainfall intensity-duration-frequency relationships. J Hydrol 206(1-2):118–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00097-3
Langousis A, Veneziano D (2007) Intensity-duration-frequency curves from scaling representations of rainfall. Water Resour Res vol 43(2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005245
Langousis A, Veneziano D, Furcolo P, Lepore C (2009) Multifractal rainfall extremes: Theoretical analysis and practical estimation. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 39(3):1182–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2007.06.004https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960077907003700
Leadbetter MR (1974) On extreme values in stationary sequences. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete 28(4):289–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00532947
Lebel T, Cappelaere B, Galle S, Hanan N, Kergoat L, Levis S, Vieux B, Descroix L, Gosset M, Mougin E, Peugeot C, Seguis L (2009) AMMA-CATCH studies in the Sahelian region of West-Africa: An overview. J Hydrol 375(1-2):3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.03.020https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022169409001875
Mathon V, Laurent H (2001) Life cycle of Sahelian mesoscale convective cloud systems. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 127(572):377–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712757208
Menabde M, Seed A, Pegram G (1999) A simple scaling model for extreme rainfall. Water Resour Res 35(1):335–339. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900012
Mélèse V, Blanchet J, Molinié G (2018) Uncertainty estimation of Intensity–Duration–Frequency relationships: A regional analysis. J Hydrol 558:579–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.07.054https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S002216941730519X
van Montfort MA (1990) Sliding maxima. J Hydrol 118(1):77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(90)90251-R
Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7(4):308–313. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308
Ouarda TBMJ, Yousef LA, Charron C (2019) Non-stationary intensity-duration-frequency curves integrating information concerning teleconnections and climate change. Int J Climatol 39(4):2306–2323. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5953
Panthou G, Vischel T, Lebel T, Blanchet J, Quantin G, Ali A (2012) Extreme rainfall in West Africa: A regional modeling. Water Resour Res vol 48(8). https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012052
Panthou G, Vischel T, Lebel T, Quantin G, Pugin AC, Blanchet J, Ali A (2013) From pointwise testing to a regional vision: An integrated statistical approach to detect nonstationarity in extreme daily rainfall. Application to the Sahelian region. J Geophys Res Atmos 118(15):8222–8237. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50340
Panthou G, Vischel T, Lebel T (2014a) Recent trends in the regime of extreme rainfall in the Central Sahel. Int J Climatol 34(15):3998–4006. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3984
Panthou G, Vischel T, Lebel T, Quantin G, Molinié G (2014b) Characterising the space–time structure of rainfall in the Sahel with a view to estimating IDAF curves. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18 (12):5093–5107. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-5093-2014
Pendergrass AG (2018) What precipitation is extreme? Science 360(6393):1072–1073
Pfahl S, O’Gorman PA, Fischer EM (2017) Understanding the regional pattern of projected future changes in extreme precipitation. Nat Clim Change 7(6):423–427. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3287
Salas JD, Obeysekera J (2014) Revisiting the concepts of return period and risk for nonstationary hydrologic extreme events. J Hydrol Eng 19(3):554–568. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000820
Sane Y, Panthou G, Bodian A, Vischel T, Lebel T, Dacosta H, Quantin G, Wilcox C, Ndiaye O, Diongue-Niang A, Diop Kane M (2018) Intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) rainfall curves in Senegal. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 18(7):1849–1866. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1849-2018
Sarhadi A, Soulis ED (2017) Time-varying extreme rainfall intensity-duration-frequency curves in a changing climate. Geophys Res Lett 44(5):2454–2463. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072201
Schertzer D, Lovejoy S (1987) Physical modeling and analysis of rain and clouds by anisotropic scaling multiplicative processes. J Geophys Res 92(D8):9693. https://doi.org/10.1029/JD092iD08p09693
Sebille Q, Fougères AL, Mercadier C (2017) Modeling extreme rainfall A comparative study of spatial extreme value models. Spat Stat 21:187–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2017.06.009https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2211675316300975
Svensson C, Jones D (2010) Review of rainfall frequency estimation methods. J Flood Risk Manag 3(4):296–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2010.01079.x
Trenberth KE (2011) Changes in precipitation with climate change. Clim Res 47(1):123–138. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00953http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/cr/v47/n1-2/p123-138/
Trenberth KE, Dai A, Rasmussen RM, Parsons DB (2003) The changing character of precipitation. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 84(9):1205–1218. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-84-9-1205
Tyralis H, Langousis A (2019) Estimation of intensity–duration–frequency curves using max-stable processes. Stoch Env Res Risk A 33(1):239–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-018-1577-2
Veneziano D, Yoon S (2013) Rainfall extremes, excesses, and intensity-duration-frequency curves: A unified asymptotic framework and new nonasymptotic results based on multifractal measures: Rainfall Extremes, Excesses, and IDF Curves. Water Resour Res 49(7):4320–4334. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20352
Wehner MF, Smith RL, Bala G, Duffy P (2010) The effect of horizontal resolution on simulation of very extreme US precipitation events in a global atmosphere model. Clim Dynam 34(2-3):241–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-009-0656-y
Westra S, Alexander LV, Zwiers FW (2013) Global increasing trends in annual maximum daily precipitation. J Clim 26(11):3904–3918. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00502.1
Westra S, Fowler HJ, Evans JP, Alexander LV, Berg P, Johnson F, Kendon EJ, Lenderink G, Roberts NM (2014) Future changes to the intensity and frequency of short-duration extreme rainfall. Rev Geophys 52(3):522–555. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000464
Yeo MH, Nguyen VTV, Kpodonu T (2020) Characterizing extreme rainfalls and constructing confidence intervals for IDF curves using Scaling-GEV distribution model. Int J Climatol p joc. 6631. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6631
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to Simon Michael Papalexiou for his enlightening comments that contributed to improving the paper.
Funding
The AMMA-CATCH regional observing system (www.amma-catch.org) was set up thanks to an incentive funding of the French Ministry of Research that allowed pooling together various pre-existing small scale observing setups. The continuity and long-term perennity of the measurements are made possible by an undisrupted IRD funding since 1990 and by a continuous CNRS-INSU funding since 2005. The research leading to these results has also received funding from the 566 NERC/DFID Future Climate For Africa program under the AMMA-2050 project, grant 567NE/M020428/1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Author contribution
G. C. and G. P. designed the methodology; G.C. performed the analysis and wrote the draft of the paper; all the authors discussed the methodology, analyzed the results, and reviewed the paper.
Availability of data and material
Data are available on http://bd.amma-catch.org
Code availability
The code is available on request.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Check of the Simple Scaling model validity for the stations and durations considered in the study
The suitability of a simple scaling modeling of the temporal scale invariance of annual maxima is checked over the 30 stations of the ACN dataset in two steps:
-
First, we check the linearity of the log(E(q)[I(D)]) vs log(D) (5) for q = {1, 2, 3, 4}. The results are shown in Fig. 11, where each marker represents a station. Figure 12 shows the Pearson coefficient of the linear regression obtained at each station, for each moment order; they are all very close to − 1.
-
Second, we check the shape of the relationship between the slopes of the linear regressions of step 1 for each moment order (referred to as k(q)) and the moment orders q. For the SS model to be considered a valid approximation, we need the linearity of k(q) vs q. Otherwise, a multi-scaling model should be preferred. As shown in Fig. 13 (left), the k(q) vs q linear fit is very satisfying for all the stations. Figure 13 (right) shows the slope (corresponding to the η parameter of the SS model) and the Pearson coefficient of these regressions.
(left) k(q) as a function of q = {1,2,3,4} and (right) slopes and Pearson coefficient (r-values) of the k(q) vs q linear regressions for the 30 stations of the case study. Markers are as in Fig.11
Pearson coefficients of correlation (r) between the time series of (a) annual maximum of rainfall intensities for D= 2h (lower left) and D= 24h (upper right) and (b) annual totals at the 30 stations of the ACN dataset. Correlations significant at the 5% level are outlined in black. The medians across the stations are indicated in the corners
2: Cross-correlation matrices of annual maxima for D= 2h and D= 24h and annual totals
Figure 14
3: Mean and variance of the GEV distribution
Equations 20 and 21 give the relationship between the mean (M) and variance (V), respectively, of the GEV distribution and its parameters.
with gk = Γ(1 − kξ) where Γ is the gamma function.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chagnaud, G., Panthou, G., Vischel, T. et al. A unified statistical framework for detecting trends in multi-timescale precipitation extremes: application to non-stationary intensity-duration-frequency curves. Theor Appl Climatol 145, 839–860 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03650-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03650-9






