Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A unified statistical framework for detecting trends in multi-timescale precipitation extremes: application to non-stationary intensity-duration-frequency curves

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a large agreement that global warming induces changes of precipitation regimes of different nature and amplitude depending on the timescale considered. This question is of special concern regarding extreme rainfall that might have critical socio-environmental consequences. A unified framework is proposed here for detecting trends in extreme rainfall. It is based on the GEV distribution, whose parameters depend both on a simple scaling formulation to account for multiple time durations of rainfall and on time to account for the non-stationarity deriving from climatic trends. The implementation of the model is illustrated in the Sahel region by analyzing 30 in situ rainfall series of 28 years measured at time-steps from 2 to 24 h. While the separate analysis of the point series proves inconclusive for detecting trends at any of the time-steps considered, the inclusion of all the series and time-steps into the proposed unified model allows trends to be detected at a high level of confidence (p-value < 1%). This trend essentially appears in the scale parameter of the regional GEV distribution, involving a 15 to 20% increase of the 10-year rainfall in 28 years, and a 23 to 30% increase of the 100-year rainfall. The main advantages of the proposed framework are (i) its parsimony, allowing for reducing the uncertainty associated with the model inference; (ii) its capacity for detecting trends either in the mean and/or in the variability of the extreme events; and (iii) its ability for producing non-stationary Intensity-Duration-Frequency curves that are coherent over a range of durations of accumulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Simon Michael Papalexiou for his enlightening comments that contributed to improving the paper.

Funding

The AMMA-CATCH regional observing system (www.amma-catch.org) was set up thanks to an incentive funding of the French Ministry of Research that allowed pooling together various pre-existing small scale observing setups. The continuity and long-term perennity of the measurements are made possible by an undisrupted IRD funding since 1990 and by a continuous CNRS-INSU funding since 2005. The research leading to these results has also received funding from the 566 NERC/DFID Future Climate For Africa program under the AMMA-2050 project, grant 567NE/M020428/1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillaume Chagnaud.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Author contribution

G. C. and G. P. designed the methodology; G.C. performed the analysis and wrote the draft of the paper; all the authors discussed the methodology, analyzed the results, and reviewed the paper.

Availability of data and material

Data are available on http://bd.amma-catch.org

Code availability

The code is available on request.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Check of the Simple Scaling model validity for the stations and durations considered in the study

The suitability of a simple scaling modeling of the temporal scale invariance of annual maxima is checked over the 30 stations of the ACN dataset in two steps:

  • First, we check the linearity of the log(E(q)[I(D)]) vs log(D) (5) for q = {1, 2, 3, 4}. The results are shown in Fig. 11, where each marker represents a station. Figure 12 shows the Pearson coefficient of the linear regression obtained at each station, for each moment order; they are all very close to − 1.

  • Second, we check the shape of the relationship between the slopes of the linear regressions of step 1 for each moment order (referred to as k(q)) and the moment orders q. For the SS model to be considered a valid approximation, we need the linearity of k(q) vs q. Otherwise, a multi-scaling model should be preferred. As shown in Fig. 13 (left), the k(q) vs q linear fit is very satisfying for all the stations. Figure 13 (right) shows the slope (corresponding to the η parameter of the SS model) and the Pearson coefficient of these regressions.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Log of the moments of order q = {1,2,3,4} as a function of the log of durations D = {2,4,6,12,18,24h} for the 30 stations of the ACN dataset (markers)

Fig. 12
figure 12

Distribution among the 30 stations of the ACN dataset of the log(E(q)[I(D)]) vs log(D) linear regression Pearson coefficients (r-values)

Fig. 13
figure 13

(left) k(q) as a function of q = {1,2,3,4} and (right) slopes and Pearson coefficient (r-values) of the k(q) vs q linear regressions for the 30 stations of the case study. Markers are as in Fig.11

Fig. 14
figure 14

Pearson coefficients of correlation (r) between the time series of (a) annual maximum of rainfall intensities for D= 2h (lower left) and D= 24h (upper right) and (b) annual totals at the 30 stations of the ACN dataset. Correlations significant at the 5% level are outlined in black. The medians across the stations are indicated in the corners

2: Cross-correlation matrices of annual maxima for D= 2h and D= 24h and annual totals

Figure 14

3: Mean and variance of the GEV distribution

Equations 20 and 21 give the relationship between the mean (M) and variance (V), respectively, of the GEV distribution and its parameters.

$$ M = \mu + \frac{\sigma}{\xi} (g_{1} - 1) ~ \text{if} ~ \xi \neq 0 ~ \text{and} ~ \xi < 1 $$
(20)
$$ V = \frac{\sigma^{2}}{\xi^{2}} (g_{2} - {g_{1}^{2}}) ~ \text{if} ~ \xi \neq 0 ~ \text{and} ~ \xi < 1/2 $$
(21)

with gk = Γ(1 − kξ) where Γ is the gamma function.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chagnaud, G., Panthou, G., Vischel, T. et al. A unified statistical framework for detecting trends in multi-timescale precipitation extremes: application to non-stationary intensity-duration-frequency curves. Theor Appl Climatol 145, 839–860 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03650-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03650-9

Keywords