Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of the FAO Penman-Monteith equation under limiting conditions and fourteen reference evapotranspiration models in southern Manitoba

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evapotranspiration is a key component of water and energy balance. An accurate estimate of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) is important for determining the water demand of field crops, water management, and hydrological modelling. The FAO-PM ETo equation is the standard equation for estimating ETo. Its use is limited by the requirement for too many observed inputs that are not always available in most weather stations. Empirical models requiring readily available inputs have been developed as an alternative. However, their performance is location-specific. Therefore, this study assesses the performance of the FAO-PM ETo computed with limited data and fourteen empirical ETo models. Meteorological data (2012–2019) was analyzed under the semi-arid climate conditions in southern Manitoba. Model performance was assessed using statistical indices, including R2, RMSE, NSE, MPE, and MAE. Results showed that ETo estimates under missing wind speed, relative humidity, or solar radiation were acceptable, although model performance decreased with increased missing data yielding average to poor performance. Based on R2, RMSE, and NSE values, among the 14 models compared, the best performing models are Valiantzas-1, Valiantzas-3, Irmak, Valiantzas-2, and Priestly-Taylor models. New empirical coefficients were developed, requiring one or two climatic inputs to improve empirical models. Results showed that the calibrated models performed better than the original equation. The sensitivity analysis showed that ETo is most sensitive to maximum temperature (Tmax) and solar radiation (Rs), followed by vapour pressure deficit (VPD), wind speed (U2), and minimum temperature (Tmin). Therefore, it is recommended to ensure accurate measurements of temperature and solar radiation for accurate ETo estimates. This study provides alternative ETo models with reasonable and accurate ETo estimates for southern Manitoba and other areas with similar climate characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adaramola MS (2012) Estimating global solar radiation using common meteorological data in Akure, Nigeria. Renew Energy 47:38–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahooghalandari M, Khiadani M, Jahromi ME (2017) Calibration of Valiantzas’ reference evapotranspiration equations for the Pilbara region, Western Australia. Theor Appl Climatol 128(3–4):845–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aladenola OO, Madramootoo CA (2014) Evaluation of solar radiation estimation methods for reference evapotranspiration estimation in Canada. Theor Appl Climatol 118(3):377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development (2011) Crop water use and requirements. Revised November 2011. Downloaded from 5485851-2011-agri-facts-crop-water-use-requirements-revised-100-561-1-2011-11.pdf (Accessed 25 Sept 2020)

  • Alexandris S, Kerkides P (2003) New empirical formula for hourly estimations of reference evapotranspiration. Agric Water Manag 60:157–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00172-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexandris S, Kerkides P, Liakatas A (2006) Daily reference evapotranspiration estimates by the “Copais” approach. Agric Water Manag 82:371–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexandris S, Stricevic R, Petkovic S (2008) Comparative analysis of reference evapotranspiration from the surface of rainfed grass in central Serbia, calculated by six empirical methods against the Penman-Monteith formula. European Water 21(22):17–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG (1997) A self-calibrating method for estimating solar radiation from air temperature. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 2(2):56–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira, Dirk Raes MS et al. (1998) Crop evapotranspiration - guidelines for computing crop water requirements - FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/docrep/X0490E/X0490E00.html (2018/09/14)

  • Awal R, Habibi H, Fares A, Deb S (2020) Estimating reference crop evapotranspiration under limited climate data in West Texas. J Hydrol Reg Stud 28:100677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azhar AH, Perera BJC (2011) Evaluation of reference evapotranspiration estimation methods under Southeast Australian Conditions. J Irrig Drain Eng 137(5):268–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biazar SM, Dinpashoh Y, Singh VP (2019) Sensitivity analysis of the reference crop evapotranspiration in a humid region. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:32517–32544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogawski P, Bednorz E (2014) Comparison and validation of selected evapotranspiration models for conditions in Poland (Central Europe). Water Resour Manag 28(14):5021–5038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourletsikas A, Argyrokastritis I, Proutsos N (2017) Comparative evaluation of 24 reference evapotranspiration equations applied on an evergreen-broadleaved forest. Hydrol Res 49(4):1028–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bueckert RA, Clarke JM (2013) Review: annual crop adaptation to abiotic stress on the Canadian prairies: Six case studies. Can J Plant Sci 93:375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C’ordova M, Carrillo-Rojas G, Crespo P, Wilcox B, Célleri R (2015) Evaluation of the Penman-Monteith (FAO 56 PM) method for calculating reference evapotranspiration using limited data. Application to the Wet Páramo of Southern Ecuador. Mt Res Dev 35(3):230–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celestin S, Qi F, Li R, Yu T, Cheng W (2020) Evaluation of 32 simple equations against the Penman–Monteith method to estimate the reference evapotranspiration in the Hexi Corridor, Northwest China. Water 12:2772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darshana D, Pandey A, Pandey RP (2013) Analysing trends in reference evapotranspiration and weather variables in the Tons River Basin in Central India. Stoch Env Res Risk A 27:1407–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djaman K, Balde AB, Sow A, Muller B, Irmak S, N’Diaye MK, Manneh B, Moukoumbi YD, Futakuchi K, Saito K (2015) Evaluation of sixteen reference evapotranspiration methods under sahelian conditions in the Senegal River Valley. J Hydrol: Reg Stud 3:139–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Djaman K, O’Neill M, Diop L (2018) Evaluation of the Penman-Monteith and other 34 reference evapotranspiration equations under limited data in a semiarid dry climate. Theor Appl Climatol 133:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Duran-Encalada JA, Paucar-Caceres A, Bandala ER, Wright GH (2017) The impact of global climate change on water quantity and quality: a system dynamics approach to the US–Mexican transborder region. Eur J Oper Res 256(2):567–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (2020) (https://climate.weather.gc.ca/climate_normals/results_1981_2010_e.html?stnID=3626&autofwd=1). (Accessed 5 Oct 2020)

  • Gao Z, He J, Dong K, Bian X, Li X (2016) Sensitivity study of reference crop evapotranspiration during growing season in the West Liao River basin, China. Theor Appl Climatol 124(3–4):865–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao F, Feng G, Ouyang Y, Wang H, Fisher D, Adeli A, Jenkins J (2017) Evaluation of reference evapotranspiration methods in arid, semiarid, and humid regions. J Am Water Resour Assoc 53:791–808. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal RK (2004) Sensitivity of evapotranspiration to global warming: a case study of arid zone of Rajasthan (India). Agric Water Manag 69:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves GH, Samani ZA (1985) Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Appl Eng Agric 1(2):96–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held IM, Soden BJ (2006) Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J Clim 19:5686–5699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irmak S, Irmak A, Allen RG, Jones JW (2003) Solar and net radiation-based equations to estimate reference evapotranspiration in humid climates. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 129(5):336–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irmak S, Payero JO, Martin DL, Irmak A, Howell TA (2006) Sensitivity analyses and sensitivity coefficients of standardized daily ASCE-Penman–Monteith equation. J Irrig Drain Eng 132:564–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabloun M, Sahli A (2008) Evaluation of FAO-56 methodology for estimating reference evapotranspiration using limited climatic data. Application to Tunisia. Agric Water Manag 95(6):707–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson EK, Roberts W, Nelsen B, Williams GP, Nelson EJ, Ames DP (2019) Introductory overview: error metrics for hydrologic modelling–A review of common practices and an open source library to facilitate use and adoption. Environ Modell Softw 119:32–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerszurki D, deSouza JLM, Silva LdCR (2019) Sensitivity of ASCE-Penman–Monteith reference evapotranspiration under different climate types in Brazil. Clim Dyn 53:943–956

  • Koudahe K, Djaman K, Adewumi JK (2018) Evaluation of the Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration under limited data and its sensitivity to key climatic variables under humid and semiarid conditions. Model Earth Syst Environ 4:1239–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Urrea R, Martín de Santa Olalla F, Fabeiro C, Moratalla A (2006) Testing evapotranspiration equations using lysimeter observations in a semiarid climate. Agric Water Manag 85(1–2):15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martel M, Glenn A, Wilson H, Krobel R (2018) Simulation of actual evapotranspiration from agricultural landscapes in the Canadian Prairies. J Hydrol: Reg Stud 15:105–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Maulé C, Helgason W, McGinn S, Cutforth H (2006) Estimation of standardized reference evapotranspiration on the Canadian Prairies using simple models with limited weather data. Can Biosyst Eng. 48, 1(1)–1-11

  • Moriasi DN, Gitau MW, Pai N, Daggupati P (2015) Hydrologic and water quality models: Performance measures and evaluation criteria. Trans ASABE 58:1763–1785. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.58.10715

  • Ndulue E, Onyekwelu I, Ogbu KN, Ogwo V (2019) Performance evaluation of solar radiation equations for estimating reference evapotranspiration (ETo) in a humid tropical environment. J Water Land Dev 42(7–9):124–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndulue E, Onyekwelu I, Okechukwu M, Anyadike C, Echiegu E (2020) Sensitivity of FAO Penman–Monteith reference evapotranspiration (ETo) to climatic variables under different climate types in Nigeria. J Water Clim Chang. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2020.200

  • Ngongondo C, Xu C-Y, Tallaksen LM, Alemaw B (2013) Evaluation of the FAO Penman-Monteith, Priestley–Taylor and Hargreaves models for estimating reference evapotranspiration in southern Malawi. Hydrol Res 44(4):706–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nistor M, Cheval S, Gualtieri AF, Dumitrescu A, Boţan VE, Berni A, Hognogi G, Irimuş IA, Porumb-Ghiurco CG (2017) Crop evapotranspiration assessment under climate change in the Pannonian basin during 1991–2050. Meteorol Appl 24:84–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nouri M, Homaee M, Bannayan M (2017) Quantitative trend, sensitivity and contribution analyses of reference evapotranspiration in some arid environments under climate change. Water Resour Manag 31:2207–2224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey PK, Dabral PP, Pandey V (2016) Evaluation of reference evapotranspiration methods for the northeastern region of India. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 4:52–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paparrizos S, Maris F, Matzarakis A (2014) Estimation and comparison of potential evapotranspiration based on daily and monthly data from Sperchios Valley in Central Greece. Global NEST J 16(2):204–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Patle GT, Singh DK (2015) Sensitivity of annual and seasonal reference crop evapotranspiration to principal climatic variables. J Earth Syst Sci 124:819–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng L, Li Y, Feng H (2017) The best alternative for estimating reference crop evapotranspiration in different sub-regions of mainland China. Sci Rep 7:5458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05660-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penman LH (1948) Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil, and grass. Proc R Meteorol Soc 193:120–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Poddar A, Gupta P, Kumar N, Shankar V, Ojha CSP (2018) Evaluation of reference evapotranspiration methods and sensitivity analysis of climatic parameters for sub-humid sub-tropical locations in western Himalayas (India). ISH J Hydraul Eng 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2018.1551731

  • Popova Z, Kercheva M, Pereira L (2006) Validation of the FAO methodology for computing ETo with limited data. Application to south Bulgaria. Irrig Drain 55(2):201–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preeyaphorn K (2011) The Effect of Temperature on Actual Evapotranspiration based on Landsat 5 TM Satellite Imagery, Evapotranspiration, Prof. Leszek Labedzki (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-251-7, InTech, Available from http://www.intechopen.com/books/evapotranspiration/the-effect-of-temperature-on-actualevapotranspiration-based-on-landsat-5-tm-satellite-imagery

  • Ravazzani G, Corbari C, Morella S, Gianoli P, Mancini M (2012) Modified Hargreaves-Samani equation for the assessment of reference evapotranspiration in Alpine River Basins. J Irrig Drain Eng 138(7):592–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razzaghi F, Sepaskhah AR (2011) Calibration and validation of four common ETo estimation equations by lysimeter data in a semi-arid environment. Arch Agron Soil Sci 58(3):303–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romanenko VA (1961) Computation of the autumn soil moisture using a universal relationship for a large area. In: Proceedings, Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Research Institute, no. 3. Kie

  • Schendel U (1967) Vegetationswasserverbrauch und -wasserbedarf. Habilitation, Kiel, p 137

  • Schneider K, Ketzer B, Breuer L, Vache KB, Bernhofer C, Frede HG (2007) Evaluation of evapotranspiration methods for model validation in a semi-arid watershed in northern China. Adv Geosci 11:37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sentelhas PC, Gillespie TJ, Santos EA (2010) Evaluation of FAO Penman-Monteith and alternative methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration with missing data in Southern Ontario, Canada. Agric Water Manag 97(5):635–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafieiyoun E, Gheysari M, Khiadani M, Koupai JA, Shojaei P, Moomkesh M (2020) Assessment of reference evapotranspiration across an arid urban environment having poor data monitoring system. Hydrol Process 34:4000–4016. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma V, Irmak S (2012) Mapping spatially interpolated precipitation, reference evapotranspiration, actual crop evapotranspiration, and net irrigation requirements in Nebraska. Part II. Actual Crop Evapotranspiration and Net Irrigation Requirements. Trans ASABE 55(3):907–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuttleworth WJ (2008) Evapotranspiration measurement methods. Southwest Hydrol 7:22–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh VP, Xu CY (1997) Evaluation and generalization of 13 mass-transfer equations for determining free water evaporation. Hydrol Process 11(3):311–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada (2018) Canola: a Canadian success story https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/96-325-x/2007000/article/10778-eng.htm (23/09/2018)

  • Tabari H, Talaee PH (2014) Sensitivity of evapotranspiration to climatic change in different climates. Glob Planet Chang 115:16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabari H, Grismer ME, Trajkovic S (2013) Comparative analysis of 31 reference evapotranspiration methods under humid conditions. Irrig Sci 31:107–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-011-0295-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabari H, Hosseinzadeh Talaee P, Willems P, Martinez C (2016) Validation and calibration of solar radiation equations for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration at cool semi-arid and arid locations. Hydrol Sci J 61:610–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.947293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trajkovic S (2007) Hargreaves versus Penman–Monteith under humid condition. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 133:38–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trajkovic S, Kolakovic S (2009) Evaluation of reference evapotranspiration equations under humid conditions. Water Resour Manage 23(14):3057–3067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USGCRP (2018) Impacts, risks, and adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Vol II . In: Reidmiller DR, Avery CW, Easterling DR, Kunkel KE, Lewis KLM, Maycock TK, Stewart BC (eds) US Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, pp 1515. https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA4.2018

  • Valiantzas JD (2013a) Simple ETo Forms of Penman ’ s Equation without wind and/or humidity data. II : Comparisons with Reduced Set-FAO and Other Methodologies. J Irrig Drain Eng 139(January):9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valiantzas JD (2013b) Simplified forms for the standardized FAO-56 Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration using limited weather data. J Hydrol 505:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valipour M (2014) Importance of solar radiation, temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed for calculation of reference evapotranspiration. Arch Agron Soil Sci 340:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Valle Júnior LCG, Ventura TM, Souza RSR, de Nogueira JS, de Lobo FA, Vourlitis GL, Rodrigues TR (2020) Comparative assessment of modelled and empirical reference evapotranspiration methods for a Brazilian savanna. Agric Water Manag 232:106040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xystrakis F, Matzarakis A (2011) Evaluation of 13 empirical reference potential evapotranspiration equations on the Island of Crete in Southern Greece. J Irrig Drain Eng 137(4):211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin Y, Wu S, Chen G, Dai E (2010) Attribution analyses of potential evapotranspiration changes in China since the 1960s. Theor Appl Climatol 101:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors express their gratitude to Manitoba Agriculture (Timi Ojo and Sass Alison) for providing the climate data. Assistantship support from GETS (Graduate Enhancement of Tri-Council Stipends) award, NSERC, and UMGF are acknowledged. The comments from two anonymous reviewers which improved the manuscript are also acknowledged.

Funding

The first author received graduate assistantship support from GETS (Graduate Enhancement of Tri-Council Stipends) award, UMGF, and NSERC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ndulue Emeka: conceptualization, literature, methodology, data curation and analysis, visualization, original draft writing, manuscript review, and editing. Ramanathan Sri Ranjan: methodology, data analysis, visualization, sensitivity analysis, and manuscript revision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emeka Ndulue.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ndulue, E., Ranjan, R.S. Performance of the FAO Penman-Monteith equation under limiting conditions and fourteen reference evapotranspiration models in southern Manitoba. Theor Appl Climatol 143, 1285–1298 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03505-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03505-9

Navigation