Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A novel non-homogeneous hidden Markov model for simulating and predicting monthly rainfall

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Monthly-to-seasonal precipitation forecasts are important in water resource management. Hidden Markov models (HMM) are widely applied in precipitation simulation due to its simplicity and advancements in associated computing techniques. HMMs, however, lack the flexibility to accommodate external factors in the dynamics. In this study, we consider a novel semiparametric Bayesian non-homogeneous hidden Markov model (BNHMM) that can explicitly incorporate the effects of observed covariates, e.g., climate index, on the state transition probabilities as well as the observation emission distributions. The proposed approach is tested for three rainfall stations in the service area of Tampa Bay Water, a regional water supply agency in the Southeastern United States. The BNHMM is first examined to simulate historical monthly rainfall data from the period 1979 to 2016. It is then evaluated in a retrospective mode to generate 3-month-ahead precipitation forecasts. Results indicate that the proposed BNHMM can capture historical rainfall properties well, and it is a promising alternative in providing operational rainfall forecasts. Although large-scale atmospheric and oceanic teleconnections, e.g., ENSO, have a strong influence in regional rainfall at the seasonal time scale, especially for the winter and early spring; its influence on monthly scale rainfall is limited. Potential improvement in forecasting performance is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bellone E, Hughes JP, Guttorp P (2000) A hidden Markov model for downscaling synoptic atmospheric patterns to precipitation amounts. Clin Res 15:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown BG, Katz RW, Murphy AH (1986) On the economic value of seasonal-precipitation forecasts: the fallowing/planting problem. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 67(7):833–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuo L, Pagano TC, Wang QJ (2011) A review of quantitative precipitation forecasts and their use in short- to medium-range streamflow forecasting. J Hydrometeorol 12(5):713–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan K, Liu Y, Chen HP (2012) Improving the prediction of the East Asian summer monsoon: new approaches. Weather Forecast 27:1017–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French NM, Krajewski WF, Cuykendall RR (1992) Rainfall forecasting in space and time using a neural network. J Hydrol 137(14):1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(92)90046-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch JM, Houze RA Jr, Adler R, Bluestein H (1998) Quantitative precipitation forecasting: report of the eighth prospectus development team, US weather research program. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79(2):285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene AM, Robertson AW, Kirshner S (2011) Analysis of Indian monsoon daily rainfall on subseasonal to multidecadal time-scales using a hidden Markov model. Q J R Meterol Soc 134:875–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habets F, LeMoigne P, Noilhan J (2004) On the utility of operational precipitation forecasts to served as input for streamflow forecasting. J Hydrol 293(1–4):270–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsclaw TA, Greene M, Robertson AW, Smyth P (2016) A Bayesian hidden Markov model of daily precipitation over South and East Asia. J Hydrometeorol 17(1):3–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsclaw T, Greene AM, Robertson AW, Smyth P (2017) Bayesian nonhomogeneous Markov models via Pólya-Gamma data augmentation with applications to rainfall modeling. Ann Appl Stat 11:393–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtslag AAM, Moeng C-H (1991) Eddy diffusivity and countergradient transport in the convective atmospheric boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 48:1690–1698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JP, Guttorp P, Charles PS (1999) A non-homogeneous hidden Markov model for precipitation occurrence. J R STAT Soc Ser C Appl Stat 48:15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim C-J, Piger J, Startz R (2008) Estimation of Markov regime-switching regression models with endogenous switching. J Econ 143:263–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostopoulou E, Giannakopoulos C, Anagnostopoulou C, Tolika K, Maheras P, Vafiadis M, Founda D (2007) Simulating maximum and minimum temperature over Greece: a comparison of three downscaling techniques. Theor Appl Climatol 90:65–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Zhang Y, Seo D-J, Kuligowski RJ, Kitzmiller D, Corby R (2014) Utility of SCaMPR satellite versus ground-based quantitative precipitation estimates in operational flood forecasting: the effects of TRMM data ingest. J Hydrometerol 6:1051–1068. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-0151.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald IL, Zucchini W (1997) Hidden Markov and other models for discrete-valued time series. Monographs on statistics and applied probability 70. Chapman & Hall, London MR1692202

    Google Scholar 

  • Meza FJ, Hansen JW, Osgood D (2008) Economic value of seasonal climate forecasts for agriculture: review of ex-ante assessments and recommendations for future research. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 47(5):1269–1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay S, Patskoski JM, Sankarasubramanian A (2018) Role of Pacific SSTs in improving reconstructed streamflow over the coterminous US. Sci Rep 8:4946. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23294-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paroli R, Spezia L (2008) Bayesian inference in non-homogeneous Markov mixtures of periodic autoregressions with state-dependent exogenous variables. Comput Stat Data Anal 52:2311–2330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopalan B, Lall U, Tarboton DG (1996) Nonhomogeneous Markov model for daily precipitation. J Hydrol Eng 1(1):33–40. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1996)1:1(33)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert CP, Ryden T, Titterington DM (2000) Bayesian inference in hidden Markov models through reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo method. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 62:57–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar A, Dunson DB (2016) Bayesian nonparametric modeling of higher order Markov chains. J Am Stat Assoc 111:1791–1803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider MJ, Garbrecht JD (2003) A measure of the usefulness of seasonal precipitation forecasts for agricultural applications. Trans ASAE 46(2):257–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skamarock WC (2004) Evaluating mesoscale NWP models using kinetic energy spectra. Mon Weather Rev 132:3019–3032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toth E, Brath A, Montanari A (2000) Comparison of short-term rainfall prediction models for real-time flood forecasting. J Hydrol 239(1–4):132–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00344-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unnikrishnan P, Jothiprakash V (2018) Daily rainfall forecasting for one year in a single run using singular spectrum analysis. J Hydrol 561:609–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.04.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viana RD, Sansigolo CA (2016) Monthly and seasonal rainfall forecasting in Southern Brazil using multiple discriminant analysis. Weather Forecast. https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-15-0155.1

  • Wang H, Asefa T (2018) Impact of different types of ENSO conditions on seasonal precipitation and streamflow in the Southeastern United States. Int J Climatol 38(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5257

  • Wang H, Liu J (2013) Reservoir operation incorporating hedging rules and operational inflow forecasts. Water Resour Manag 27(5):1427–1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0246-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Sankarasubramanian A, Ranjithan RS (2013) Integration of climate and weather information for improving 15-day-ahead accumulated precipitation forecasts. J Hydrometeorol 14(1):186–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Brill ED, Ranjithan RS, Sankarasubramanian A (2015) A framework for incorporating ecological releases in single reservoir operation. Adv Water Resour 78:9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Asefa T, Bracciano D, Adams A, Wanakule N (2019) Proactive water shortage mitigation integrating system optimization and input uncertainty. J Hydrol 571(4):711–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.01.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang QJ, Schepen A, Robertson DE (2012) Merging seasonal rainfall forecasts from multiple statistical models through Bayesian model averaging. J Clim 25:5524–5537. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00386.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks DS (1995) Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences. Academic Press, San Diego, p 467

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilitinkevich S, Gryanik VM, Lykossov VN, Mironov DV (1999) Third-order transport and nonlocal turbulence closures for convective boundary layers. J Atmos Sci 56:3463–3477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorita E, von Storch H (1999) The analog method as a simple statistical downscaling technique: comparison with more complicated methods. J Clim 12:2474–2489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucchini W, Guttorp P (1991) A hidden Markov model for space-time precipitation. Water Resour Res 27:1917–1923. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR01403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucchini W, MacDonald I, Langrock R (2016) Hidden Markov models for time series, an introduction using R. Chpman & Hall, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the editor, anonymous associate editor, and reviewers for the constructive comments that improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Principal Water Resources Systems Engineer, Tampa Bay Water, 2575 Enterprise Road, Clearwater, FL, 33763, USA

    Hui Wang

  2. System Decision Support, Tampa Bay Water, Clearwater, FL, 33763, USA

    Tirusew Asefa

  3. Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA

    Abhra Sarkar

Authors
  1. Hui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tirusew Asefa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abhra Sarkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Wang.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Asefa, T. & Sarkar, A. A novel non-homogeneous hidden Markov model for simulating and predicting monthly rainfall. Theor Appl Climatol 143, 627–638 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03447-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03447-2

Search

Navigation