Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of a mechanical drag coefficient formulation in the complex urban area of Beijing

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The constant building drag coefficient was replaced by a mechanical drag coefficient formulation in a multilayer urban canopy system coupled with the Rapid-refresh Multiscale Analysis and Prediction System to improve the wind speed prediction performance in complex urban areas. Although this formulation has been assessed in idealized urban areas by computational fluid dynamic simulations, the applicability of this formulation has not been sufficiently evaluated, especially in complex urban areas with inhomogeneously distributed tall buildings. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of the coupled system in the Beijing urban area. The results show that the average wind speed model performance is improved by 40% in summer and 36% in winter by introducing a drag coefficient into the regional forecast model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashie Y, Vu Thanh C, Asaeda T (1999) Building canopy model for the analysis of urban climate. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 81:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein RD (1987) ‘Mean diurnal circulation and thermodynamic evolution of urban boundary layers’, in modelling the urban boundary layer. American Meteorological Society, Boston, pp 53–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Bougeault P, Lacarrere P (1989) Parameterization of orography induced turbulence in a mesobeta-scale model. Mon Weather Rev 117:1872–1890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burian S, Augustus N, Jeyachandran I, Brown M (2008) National building statistics database: version 2. Technical Report. Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, 18 pp

  • Carvalho D, Rocha A, Gómez-Gesteira M, Santos C (2012) A sensitivity study of the WRF model in wind simulation for an area of high wind energy. Environ Model Softw 33:23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ching J, Brown M, Burian S, Chen F, Cionco R, Hanna A, Hultgren T, McPherson T, Sailor D, Taha H, Williams D (2009) National Urban Database and Access Portal Tool (NUDAPT). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90(08):1157–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coceal O, Belcher SE (2004) A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 130:1349–1372. https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudhia J (1989) Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J Atmos Sci 46:3077–3107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan S (2015) Assessment report of regional high resolution model (BJ-RUCv3.0). IUM technical note IUM/2015-1. IUM: Beijing, China

  • Grell GA, Dudhia J, Stauffer DR (1994) A description of the fifth generation PSU/NCAR mesoscale modeling system (MM5). Technical Note NCAR/TNd379 þ STR, NCAR

  • Gutiérrez E, Martilli A, Santiago JL, González JE (2015) A mechanical drag coefficient formulation and urban canopy parameter assimilation technique for complex urban environments. Bound-Layer Meteorol 157(2):333–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He X, Li Y, Wang X, Chen L, Yu B, Zhang Y et al (2019) High-resolution dataset of urban canopy parameters for Beijing and its application to the integrated wrf/urban modelling system. J Clean Prod 208:373–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosker R (1984) Flow and diffusion near obstacles in atmospheric science and power production, Ch. 7, DOE/TIC-27601

  • Kusaka H, Kondo H, Kikegawa Y, Kimura F (2001) A simple single-layer urban canopy model for atmospheric models: comparison with multi-layer and slab models. Bound-Layer Meteorol 101:329–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Chen F, Warner T, Basara J (2006) Verification of a mesoscale data-assimilation and forecasting system for the Oklahoma City area during the joint urban 2003 field project. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 45:912–929. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2383.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martilli A, Clappier A, Rotach MW (2002) An urban surface exchange parameterization for mesoscale models. Bound-Layer Meteorol 104:261–304. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016099921195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masson V (2000) A physically-based scheme for the urban energy budget in atmospheric models. Bound-Layer Meteorol 94:357–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mlawer E, Taubman S, Brown P, Iacono M, Clough S (1997) Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmosphere:RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for longwave. J Geophys Res 102(D14):16663–16682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monin AS, Obukhov AM (1954) Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the surface layer of the atmosphere. Tr Akad Nauk SSSR Geophiz Inst 24(151):163–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor SC, Nikulin G, Jones C (2012) Influence of spatial resolution on regional climate model derived wind climates. J Geophys Res Atmos 117(D3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016822

  • Raupach MR (1992) Drag and drag partition on rough surfaces. Bound-Layer Meteorol 60:375–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamanca F, Krpo A, Martilli A, Clappier A (2009) A new building energy model coupled with an urban canopy parameterization for urban climate simulations- Part1 formulation, verification and sensitivity analysis of the model. Theor Appl Clim 99(3–4):331–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-009-0142-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santiago JL, Martilli A (2010) A dynamic urban canopy parameterization for mesoscale models based on computational fluid dynamics Reynolds-averaged Navier–stokes microscale simulations. Bound Layer Meteorol 137:417–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker D, Wang W, Powers JG (2008) A description of the advanced research WRF version 3, NCAR/TN-475 + STR

  • Thompson G, Rasmussen R, Manning K (2004) Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part I: description & sensitivity analysis. Mon Weather Rev 132:519–542. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2387.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uno I, Ueda H, Wakamatsu S (1989) Numerical modelling of the nocturnal urban boundary layer. Bound Layer Meteorol 49:77–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D-L, Zheng W (2004) Diurnal cycles of surface winds and temperatures as simulated by five boundary-layer parameterizations. J Appl Meteorol 43:157–169. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043<0157:DCOSWA>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Miao S, Dai Y, Liu YH (2013) Numerical simulation of characteristics of summer clear day boundary layer in Beijing and the impact of urban underlying surface on sea breeze [in Chinese]. Chin J Geophys 56(8):2558–2573

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miao Yu.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, M., González, J. & Miao, S. Evaluation of a mechanical drag coefficient formulation in the complex urban area of Beijing. Theor Appl Climatol 142, 743–749 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03354-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03354-6

Navigation