Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Role of vertical velocity in improving finer scale statistical downscaling for projection of extreme precipitation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increase in human-induced climate warming is unequivocal and is subsequently causing an increase in the magnitude of precipitation extremes around the globe, inducing substantial damages to the socioeconomic sectors. Thus, a reliable projection of extreme precipitation scenarios is crucial for designing suitable adaptation strategies. At present, this is being attempted with the use of general circulation models (GCMs) projections. However, the GCMs simulate the extreme precipitation events rather poorly, especially over the tropical regions, and also suffer from frequent lack of reliability at local/regional scales. Therefore, it is of paramount significance to identify the relevant physical parameters for the extreme precipitation scenarios, and further implement these parameters in downscaling approaches to significantly improve the impact assessment at a regional scale. Previous studies have reported that the dynamic component (mainly vertical wind velocity) has a significant influence on the precipitation extremes over South Asian regions, along with the thermodynamic component. This indicates that the consideration of vertical wind velocity for projecting the precipitation extremes may significantly increase the efficacy of the downscaling approach, a contemplation that provoked its inclusion in statistical downscaling in this study. The methodology was demonstrated over the Mahanadi river basin (India), which often experiences heavy rainfall during the monsoon and post-monsoon disturbances originating from the Bay of Bengal (BoB). We observed that the dynamic component plays a crucial role in changing the pattern of precipitation extremes over the basin. Further, we noticed that inclusion of this dynamic component in statistical downscaling significantly improved the extreme precipitation projections. Based on these observations, we projected (2026–2055) the mean and extreme precipitation events, considering six most efficient CMIP5 models for the Indian subcontinent under RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios. The outcomes of this study can be utilized in deriving reliable water resource management practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Asokan SM, Dutta D (2008) Analysis of water resources in the Mahanadi River Basin, India under projected climate conditions. Hydrol Process 22:3589–3603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles S (2001) An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, London

  • Coulibaly P, Dibike YB (2004) Downscaling of global climate model outputs for flood frequency analysis in the Saguenay River system. Final project report prepared for the Canadian Climate Change Action Fund, Environment Canada, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. http://www-hydrology.mcmaster.ca/documents/CCAF_Final_Report.pdf. Accessed on 2 December 2017

  • Dairaku K, Emori S (2006) Dynamic and thermodynamic influences on intensified daily rainfall during the Asian summer monsoon under doubled atmospheric CO2 conditions. Geophys Res Lett 33:L01704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deser C, Knutti R, Solomon S, Phillips AS (2012) Communication of the role of natural variability in future North American climate. Nat Clim Chang 2(11):775–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupuis DJ, Field CA (1998) A comparison of confidence intervals for generalized extreme-value distributions. J Stat Comput Simul 61:341–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterling DR, Evans JL, Groisman PY, Karl TR, Kunkel KE, Ambenje P (2000) Observed variability and trends in extreme climate events: a brief review. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 81(3):417–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emori S, Brown SJ (2005) Dynamic and thermodynamic changes in mean and extreme precipitation under changed climate. Geophys Res Lett 32(17)

  • Fox J (2002) An R and S-Plus companion to applied regression. Sage

  • Gadgil S, Sajani S (1998) Monsoon precipitation in the AMIP runs. Clim Dyn 14(9):659–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Raje D, Mujumdar PP (2010) Mahanadi streamflow: climate change impact assessment and adaptive strategies. Curr Sci:1084–1091

  • Ghosh S, Das D, Kao SC, Ganguly AR (2012) Lack of uniform trends but increasing spatial variability in observed Indian rainfall extremes. Nat Clim Chang 2(2):86–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Vittal H, Sharma T, Karmakar S, Kasiviswanathan K, Dhanesh Y, Sudheer K, Gunthe S (2016) Indian summer monsoon rainfall: implications of contrasting trends in the spatial variability of means and extremes. PLoS One 11:e0158670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosain AK, Rao S, Basuray D (2006) Climate change impact assessment on hydrology of Indian River basins. Curr Sci 90:346–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitson BC, Crane RG (1996) Climate downscaling: techniques and application. Clim Res 7:85–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu ZZ, Latif M, Roeckner E, Bengtsson L (2000) Intensified Asian summer monsoon and its variability in a coupled model forced by increasing greenhouse gas concentrations. Geophys Res Lett 27(17):2681–2684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber PJ (1972) The 1972 Wald lecture robust statistics: a review. Ann Math Statist 43(4):1041–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007), Climate change 2007: the physical science base, contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of IPCC

  • Jena PP, Chatterjee C, Pradhan G, Mishra A (2014) Are recent frequent high floods in Mahanadi basin in eastern India due to increase in extreme rainfalls? J Hydroyn 517:847–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, Deaven D, Gandin L, Iredell M, Saha S, White G, Woollen J, Zhu Y (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan S, Ghosh S (2013) A nonparametric kernel regression model for downscaling multisite daily precipitation in the Mahanadi basin. Water Resour Res 49:1360–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan S, Ghosh S, Mishra V, Salvi K (2014) Uncertainty resulting from multiple data usage in statistical downscaling. Geophys Res Lett 41(11):4013–4019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan S, Kuhn G, Ganguly AR, Erickson DJ, Ostrouchov G (2007) Spatio-temporal variability of daily and weekly precipitation extremes in South America. Water Resour Res 43:\

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kharin VV, Zwiers FW, Zhang X, Hegerl GC (2007) Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the IPCC ensemble of global coupled model simulations. J Clim 20(8):1419–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim IW, Oh J, Woo S, and Kripalani RH (2018) Evaluation of precipitation extremes over the Asian domain: observation and modelling studies. Clim Dyn online https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4193-4

  • Kripalani RH, Oh JH, Chaudhari HS (2007) Response of the East Asian summer monsoon to doubled atmospheric CO2: coupled climate model simulations and projections under IPCC AR4. Theor Appl Climatol 87:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loriaux JM, Lenderink G, De Roode SR, Siebesma AP (2013) Understanding convective extreme precipitation scaling using observations and an entraining plume model. J Atmos Sci 70(11):3641–3655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl GA, Tebaldi C (2004) More intense, more frequent, and longer lasting heat waves in the 21st century. Science 305(5686):994–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl GA, Karl T, Easterling DR, Changnon S, Pielke R Jr, Changnon D, Evans J, Groisman PY, Knutson TR, Kunkel KE, Mearns LO (2000) An introduction to trends in extreme weather and climate events: observations, socioeconomic impacts, terrestrial ecological impacts, and model projections. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 81(3):413–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao C, Su L, Sun Q, Duan Q (2016) A nonstationary bias-correction technique to remove bias in GCM simulations. J Geophys Res Atmos 121:5718–5735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min SK, Zhang X, Zwiers FW, Hegerl GC (2011) Human contribution to more-intense precipitation extremes. Nature 470(7334):378–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra V, Kumar D, Ganguly AR, Sanjay J, Mujumdar M, Krishnan R, Shah RD (2014) Reliability of regional and global climate models to simulate precipitation extremes over India. J Geophy Res: Atmos 119(15):9301–9323

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Gorman PA (2015) Precipitation extremes under climate change. Curr Clim Change Rep 1:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Gorman PA, Schneider T (2009) The physical basis for increases in precipitation extremes in simulations of 21st-century climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:14773–14777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odisha State Water Plan (2004) Annexure G: floods in Mahanadi, Orrisa State Water Plan Report, Department of Water Resources, Govt. of Odisha. http://www.dowrorissa.gov.in/SWPlan2004/SWPlan2004.htm. Accessed on 25 August 2017

  • Pall P, Aina T, Stone DA, Stott PA, Nozawa T, Hilberts AG, Lohmann D, Allen MR (2011) Anthropogenic greenhouse gas contribution to flood risk in England and Wales in autumn 2000. Nature 470(7334):382–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul S, Ghosh S, Oglesby R, Pathak A, Chandrasekharan A, Ramsankaran RA (2016) Weakening of Indian summer monsoon rainfall due to changes in land use land cover. Sci Rep 6:32177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfahl S, O’Gorman P, Fischer E (2017) Understanding the regional pattern of projected future changes in extreme precipitation. Nat Clim Chang 7:423–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preethi B, Mujumdar M, Kripalani RH, Prabhu A, Krishnan R (2017a) Recent trends and teleconnections among South and East Asian summer monsoons in a warming environment. Clim Dyn 48(7–8):2489–2505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preethi B, Mujumdar M, Prabhu A, Kripalani RH (2017b) Variability and tele-connections of sSouth and East Asian summer monsoon in present and future projections of CMIP5 climate models. Asia-Pacific J Atmos Sci 53(2):305–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raje D, Mujumdar P (2010) Reservoir performance under uncertainty in hydrologic impacts of climate change. Adv Water Resour 33:312–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao YP (1976) Southwest monsoon. Synoptic Meteorology, Meteorological Monogr., India Meteorological Department. 1:367

  • Rao PG (1993) Climatic changes and trends over a major river basin in India. Clim Res 2:215–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revadekar JV, Patwardhan SK, Rupa Kumar K (2011) Characteristic features of precipitation extremes over India in the warming scenarios. Adv Meteorol 2011:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roxy MK, Ritika K, Terray P, Murtugudde R, Ashok K, Goswami BN (2015) Drying of Indian subcontinent by rapid Indian Ocean warming and a weakening land-sea thermal gradient. Nat Commun 16(6):7423–7429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabeerali CT, Ramu Dandi A, Dhakate A, Salunke K, Mahapatra S, Rao SA (2013) Simulation of boreal summer intraseasonal oscillations in the latest CMIP5 coupled GCMs. J Geophys Res Atmos 118(10):4401–4420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha A, Ghosh S, Sahana A, Rao E (2014) Failure of CMIP5 climate models in simulating post-1950 decreasing trend of Indian monsoon. Geophys Res Lett 41:7323–7330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvi K, Kannan S, Ghosh S (2013) High-resolution multisite daily precipitation projections in India with statistical downscaling for climate change impacts assessment. J Geophys Res Atmos 118:3557–3578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvi K, Ghosh S, Ganguly AR (2016) Credibility of statistical downscaling under nonstationary climate. Clim Dyn 46:1991–2023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarthi PP, Ghosh S, Kumar P (2015) Possible future projection of Indian Summer Monsoon Rainfall (ISMR) with the evaluation of model performance in coupled model inter-comparison project phase 5 (CMIP5). Glob Planet Change 129:92–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma T, Vittal H, Chhabra S, Salvi K, Ghosh S, Karmakar S (2018) Understanding the cascade of GCM and downscaling uncertainties in hydro-climatic projections over India. Intl J Climatol 38:178-190

  • Sharmila S, Joseph S, Sahai A, Abhilash S, Chattopadhyay R (2015) Future projection of Indian summer monsoon variability under climate change scenario: an assessment from CMIP5 climate models. Glob Planet Chang 124:62–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shashikanth K, Madhusoodhanan C, Ghosh S, Eldho T, Rajendran K, Murtugudde R (2014) Comparing statistically downscaled simulations of Indian monsoon at different spatial resolutions. J Hydrol 519:3163–3177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shashikanth K, Ghosh S, Vittal H, Karmakar S (2017) Future projections of Indian summer monsoon precipitation extremes over India with statistical downscaling and its consistency with observed characteristics. Clim Dyn:1–15

  • Singh J, Vittal H, Karmakar S, Ghosh S, Niyogi D (2016) Urbanization causes nonstationarity in Indian Summer Monsoon Rainfall extremes. Geophys Res Lett 43(21):11,269–11,277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Ghosh S, Sahana AS, Vittal H, Karmakar S (2017) Do dynamic regional models add value to the global model projections of Indian monsoon? Clim Dyn 48(3–4):1375–1397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solari S, Losada MA (2012) A unified statistical model for hydrological variables including the selection of threshold for the peak over threshold method. Water Resour Res 48(10):W10541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timbal B, Hope P, Charles S (2008) Evaluating the consistency between statistically downscaled and global dynamical model climate change projections. J Clim 21(22):6052–6059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner AG, Slingo JM (2009a) Sub seasonal extremes of precipitation and active-break cycles of the Indian summer monsoon in a climate change scenario. Q J R Meteorol Soc 135:549–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner AG, Slingo JM (2009b) Uncertainties in future projections of extreme precipitation in the Indian monsoon region. Atmos Sci Lett 10:152–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vittal H, Karmakar S, Ghosh S (2013) Diametric changes in trends and patterns of extreme rainfall over India from pre-1950 to post-1950. Geophys Res Lett 40:3253–3258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vittal H, Ghosh S, Karmakar S, Pathak A, Murtugudde R (2016) Lack of dependence of Indian summer monsoon precipitation extremes on temperature: an observational evidence. Sci Rep 6:31039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrac M, Stein M, Hayhoe K (2007) Statistical downscaling of precipitation through nonhomogeneous stochastic weather typing. Clim Res 34(3):169–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Kang IS, Lee YJ (2004) Ensemble simulations of Asian–Australian monsoon variability during 1997/1998 El Niño by 11 AGCMs. J Clim 17(4):803–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Wigley TML (1997) Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations. Prog Phys Geogr 21:530–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Wigley TML (2000) Precipitation predictors for downscaling: observed and general circulation model relationships. Int J Climatol 20(6):641–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Wigley TM, Conway D, Jones PD, Hewitson BC, Main J, Wilks DS (1998) Statistical downscaling of general circulation model output: a comparison of methods. Water Resour Res 34(11):2995–3008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Hassan H, Hanaki K (2005) Statistical downscaling of hydrometeorological variables using general circulation model output. J Hydrol 205(1–2):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • WRIS-India (2015) Water Resource Information System of India—a joint venture of the Central Water Commission (CWC), Ministry of Water Resources, Govt. of India and Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO), Department of Space, Govt. of India. http://india-wris.nrsc.gov.in/wrpinfo/index.php?title=Mahanadi. Accessed on 25 August 2017

  • Yang C, Wang N, Wang S (2017) A comparison of three predictor selection methods for statistical downscaling. Int J Climatol 37:1238–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yatagai A, Kamiguchi K, Arakawa O, Hamada A, Yasutomi N, Kitoh A (2012) APHRODITE: constructing a long-term daily gridded precipitation dataset for Asia based on a dense network of rain gauges. Bull Amer Meteorol Soc 93:1401–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work presented here is supported financially by ISRO-IIT(B)-Space Technology Cell (STC) through a sponsored research project (No. 14ISROC009). The authors acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s working Group on coupled Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP, and we thank the modeling groups for producing and making available their model output through the U.S. Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI) portal. We also would like to thank APHRODITE, Japan, for making observed gridded datasets available. The reanalysis data were obtained from the website http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/gridded/data.ncep.reanalysis.html. The authors sincerely thank the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IIT Bombay) for providing all the computational facilities. The authors are grateful to the editors and the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subhankar Karmakar.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 3565 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gusain, A., Vittal, H., Kulkarni, S. et al. Role of vertical velocity in improving finer scale statistical downscaling for projection of extreme precipitation. Theor Appl Climatol 137, 791–804 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2615-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2615-1