Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analyzing long-term spatial variability of blue and green water footprints in a semi-arid mountainous basin with MIROC-ESM model (case study: Kashafrood River Basin, Iran)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The river basin hydrology cycles and the available water resources (including blue and green water) are greatly influenced by the climate change and rainfall patterns in regions with arid and semi-arid climates. In this study, the impacts of climate change on the parameters of virtual water is evaluated in the Kashafrood River (KR), as a large-scale basin which is located in the northeast of Iran, by means of SWAT model (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) along with SUFI-2 (Sequential Uncertainty Fitting Program version 2). In addition, sensitivity and uncertainty analyses are taken into account at five runoff stations for calibrating and validating the model. Based on the changes in blue water (BW), green water flow (GWF), and green water storage (GWS), the water availability was analyzed using MIROC-ESM model in series of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) and was compared with two Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) of new emission scenarios (RCP2.6 and RCP8.5). These emission scenarios were downscaled based on the observed data under three future periods: near future (2014–2042), intermediate future (2043–2071), and far future (2072–2100) in relation to a historical period (1992–2013). Calibration and validation at multi-site (five stations) showed a proper performance of the SWAT model in modeling hydrological processes. Results of investigating climate change impacts on the blue and green water components (BW and GW) showed that in the historical period, the basin was not in an appropriate climate condition for accessing the water resources. Also, in future times, considerable spatial variations in different hydrological components were observed. On the other hand, under both RCPs and in all three future periods in relative to historical period, the BW contents will increase about 46–74%, while GWF will decrease about 2–15%. Regarding the historical period, it was revealed that the condition of the basin will be improved. In addition, the GWS tended to rise about 11–18% or decrease about 6–60% in the future. The BW and GWS will decrease, and GWS will increase by changing from the near future to the intermediate future. On the other hand, by changing from the intermediate to the far future, BW and GWF will increase under RCP2.6 and will decrease under RCP8.5, respectively. Also, GWS will decrease under both RCPs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbasa N, Wasimia SA, Al-Ansari N (2016) Assessment of climate change impacts on water resources of Al-Adhaim, Iraq using SWAT model. Engineering 8(10):716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbaspour KC (2005) Calibration of hydrologic models: when is a model calibrated. In MODSIM 2005 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand (pp. 2449–12455)

  • Abbaspour KC, Rouholahnejad E, Vaghefi S, Srinivasan R, Yang H, Kløve B (2015) A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model. J Hydrol 524:733–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbaspour KC, Yang J, Maximov I, Siber R, Bogner K, Mieleitner J et al (2007) Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT. J Hydrol 333(2):413–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afshar AA, Hassanzadeh Y (2017) Determination of monthly hydrological erosion severity and runoff in Torogh Dam watershed basin using SWAT and WEPP models. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 41(2):221–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afshar AA, Hasanzadeh Y, Besalatpour AA, Pourreza-Bilondi M (2017) Climate change forecasting in a mountainous data scarce watershed using CMIP5 models under representative concentration pathways. Theor Appl Climatol 129(1–2):683–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed KF, Wang G, Silander J, Wilson AM, Allen JM, Horton R, Anyah R (2013) Statistical downscaling and bias correction of climate model outputs for climate change impact assessment in the U.S. northeast. Glob Planet Chang 100:320–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 34(1):73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf Vaghefi S, Mousavi SJ, Abbaspour KC, Srinivasan R, Yang H (2014) Analyses of the impact of climate change on water resources components, drought and wheat yield in semiarid regions: Karkheh River Basin in Iran. Hydrol Process 28(4):2018–2032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basheer AK, Ali AB, Abdelgader AM (2016) Impacts of climate change under CMIP5 RCP scenarios on the streamflow in the Dinder River and ecosystem habitats in Dinder National Park, Sudan. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20(4):1331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brekke L, Thrasher BL, Maurer EP, & Pruitt T (2013) Downscaled CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate projections: release of downscaled CMIP5 climate projections, comparison with preceding information, and summary of user needs. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Technical Service Center, Denver, Colorado

  • Chaturvedi RK, Joshi J, Jayaraman M, Bala G, Ravindranath NH (2012) Multi-model climate change projections for India under representative concentration pathways. Curr Sci 103(7):791–802

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Hagemann S, Liu J (2015) Assessment of impact of climate change on the blue and green water resources in large river basins in China. Environ Earth Sci 74(8):6381–6394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho J, Bosch D, Lowrance R, Strickland T, Vellidis G (2009) Effect of spatial distribution of rainfall on temporal and spatial uncertainty of SWAT output. Trans ASABE 52(5):1545–1556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie NA (1993) Statistics for spatial data, John Wiley

  • Diaz-Nieto J, Wilby RL (2005) A comparison of statistical downscaling and climate change factor methods: impacts on low flows in the River Thames, United Kingdom. Clim Chang 69(2):245–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan K, Mei Y (2014) A comparison study of three statistical downscaling methods and their model-averaging ensemble for precipitation downscaling in China. Theor Appl Climatol 116(3–4):707–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evaristo J, Jasechko S, McDonnell JJ (2015) Global separation of plant transpiration from groundwater and streamflow. Nature 525(7567):91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenmark M (1995) Coping with water scarcity under rapid population growth. In Conference of SADC ministers, Pretoria (Vol. 23, p. 24)

  • Falkenmark M, & Rockström J (2006) The new blue and green water paradigm: breaking new ground for water resources planning and management. Water Resour Plan Manag, 129–132

  • Falkenmark M, Rockström J (2010) Building water resilience in the face of global change: from a blue-only to a green-blue water approach to land-water management. Water Resour Plan Manag 136(6):606–610. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farajzadeh M, Oji R, Cannon AJ, Ghavidel Y, Bavani AM (2015) An evaluation of single-site statistical downscaling techniques in terms of indices of climate extremes for the Midwest of Iran. Theor Appl Climatol 120(1–2):377–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faramarzi M, Abbaspour KC, Schulin R, Yang H (2009) Modelling blue and green water resources availability in Iran. Hydrol Process 23(3):486–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faramarzi M, Abbaspour KC, Lu W, Fennell J, Zehnder AJ, Goss GG (2017) Uncertainty based assessment of dynamic freshwater scarcity in semi-arid watersheds of Alberta, Canada. J Hydrol: Reg Stud 9:48–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay LE, Wilby RL, Leavesley GH (2000) A comparison of delta change and downscaled GCM scenarios for three mountainous basins in the United States. JAWRA J Am Water Res Assoc 36(2):387–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK, Aldaya MM, Mekonnen MM (2011) The water footprint assessment manual. Setting the global standard, Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal W, Zahid M (2014) Historical and future trends of summer mean air temperature over South Asia. Pak J Meteorol 10(20):67–74

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Exit EPA disclaimer contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by ML. Parry et al. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

  • IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014 synthesis report. Summary for policymakers. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Retrieved December 18, 2014, from www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment report/AR5/syr/SYR_AR5_SPMcorr1.pdf

  • Jiang D, Tian Z (2013) East Asian monsoon change for the 21st century: results of CMIP3 and CMIP5 models. Chin Sci Bull 58(12):1427–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leta OT, van Griensven A, Bauwens W (2016) Effect of single and multisite calibration techniques on the parameter estimation, performance, and output of a SWAT model of a spatially heterogeneous catchment. J Hydrol Eng 22(3):05016036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Wang Y, Yu Z, Cao X, Tian L, Sun S, Wu P (2017) A comprehensive analysis of blue water scarcity from the production, consumption, and water transfer perspectives. Ecol Indic 72:870–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Zehnder AJ, Yang H (2009) Global consumptive water use for crop production: the importance of green water and virtual water. Water Resour Res 45(5):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malagò A, Pagliero L, Bouraoui F, Franchini M (2015) Comparing calibrated parameter sets of the SWAT model for the Scandinavian and Iberian peninsulas. Hydrol Sci J 60(5):949–967

    Google Scholar 

  • Memarian H, Balasundram SK, Abbaspour KC, Talib JB, Boon Sung CT, Sood AM (2014) SWAT-based hydrological modelling of tropical land-use scenarios. Hydrol Sci J 59(10):1808–1829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narsimlu B, Gosain AK, Chahar BR, Singh SK, Srivastava PK (2015) SWAT model calibration and uncertainty analysis for streamflow prediction in the Kunwari River Basin, India, using sequential uncertainty fitting. Environ Process 2(1):79–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, & Williams JR (2011) Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation version 2009. Texas Water Resources Institute

  • Oki T, Kanae S (2007) Current situation and future perspectives on global hydrologic cycles, water balances, and world freshwater resources. J Geogr (Chigaku Zasshi) 116(1):31–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ou T, Chen D, Linderholm HW, Jeong JH (2013) Evaluation of global climate models in simulating extreme precipitation in China. Tellus A: Dyn Meteorol Oceanogr 65(1):19799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedro-Monzonís M, Solera A, Ferrer J, Estrela T, Paredes-Arquiola J (2015) A review of water scarcity and drought indexes in water resources planning and management. J Hydrol 527:482–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, L. S., Cordery, I., & Iacovides, I. (2009). Coping with water scarcity: addressing the challenges. Springer Science & Business Media

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström J, Karlberg L, Wani SP, Barron J, Hatibu N, Oweis T et al (2010) Managing water in rainfed agriculture—the need for a paradigm shift. Agric Water Manag 97(4):543–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues DB, Gupta HV, Mendiondo EM (2014) A blue/green water-based accounting framework for assessment of water security. Water Resour Res 50(9):7187–7205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salzmann M, Weser H, Cherian R (2014) Robust response of Asian summer monsoon to anthropogenic aerosols in CMIP5 models. J Geophys Res: Atmos 119(19):11321–11337

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez JA, Reca J, Martínez J (2015) Water productivity in a Mediterranean semi-arid greenhouse district. Water Resour Manag 29(14):5395–5411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuol J, Abbaspour KC, Yang H, Srinivasan R, Zehnder AJ (2008) Modeling blue and green water availability in Africa. Water Resour Res 44(7):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigdel M, Ma Y (2016) Evaluation of future precipitation scenario using statistical downscaling model over humid, subhumid, and arid region of Nepal—a case study. Theor Appl Climatol 123(3–4):453–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seneviratne SI, Nicholls N, Easterling D, Goodess CM, Kanae S, Kossin J, ... & Reichstein M (2012). Changes in climate extremes and their impacts on the natural physical environment: an overview of the IPCC SREX report. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts (Vol. 14, p. 12566)

  • Setegn SG, Srinivasan R, Melesse AM, Dargahi B (2010) SWAT model application and prediction uncertainty analysis in the Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia. Hydrol Process 24(3):357–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Terink W, Immerzeel WW, Droogers P (2013) Climate change projections of precipitation and reference evapotranspiration for the Middle East and Northern Africa until 2050. Int J Climatol 33(14):3055–3072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA-SCS (1986) US Department of Agriculture-Soil Conservation Service (USDASCS): urban hydrology for small watersheds. USDA, Washington, DC.

  • Van Griensven A, Meixner T, Grunwald S, Bishop T, Diluzio M, Srinivasan R (2006) A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. J Hydrol 324(1):10–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vuuren, D. P., Edmonds, J., Kainuma, M., Riahi, K., Thomson, A., Hibbard, K., ... & Masui, T. (2011). The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Chang, 109(1–2), 5

  • Veettil AV, Mishra AK (2016) Water security assessment using blue and green water footprint concepts. J Hydrol 542:589–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre PB, Gessner MO, Dudgeon D, Prusevich A, Green P et al (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467(7315):555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White M, Gambone M, Yen H, Arnold J, Harmel D, Santhi C, Haney R (2015) Regional blue and green water balances and use by selected crops in the US. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 51(6):1626–1642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woldemeskel FM, Sharma A, Sivakumar B, Mehrotra R (2016) Quantification of precipitation and temperature uncertainties simulated by CMIP3 and CMIP5 models. J Geophys Res: Atmos 121(1):3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood AW, Maurer EP, Kumar A, Lettenmaier DP (2002) Long range experimental hydrologic forecasting for the eastern United States. J Geophys Res: Atmos 107(D20)

  • Wu H, Chen B (2015) Evaluating uncertainty estimates in distributed hydrological modeling for the Wenjing River watershed in China by GLUE, SUFI-2, and ParaSol methods. Ecol Eng 76:110–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu L, Xie SP, Liu Q (2012) Mode water ventilation and subtropical countercurrent over the North Pacific in CMIP5 simulations and future projections. J Geophys Res: Oceans 117(C12)

  • Yang J, Reichert P, Abbaspour KC, Xia J, Yang H (2008) Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in China. J Hydrol 358(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo D, Xu Z, Peng D, Song J, Cheng L, Wei S et al (2015) Simulating spatiotemporal variability of blue and green water resources availability with uncertainty analysis. Hydrol Process 29(8):1942–1955

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Aghakhani Afshar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aghakhani Afshar, A., Hassanzadeh, Y., Pourreza-Bilondi, M. et al. Analyzing long-term spatial variability of blue and green water footprints in a semi-arid mountainous basin with MIROC-ESM model (case study: Kashafrood River Basin, Iran). Theor Appl Climatol 134, 885–899 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2309-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2309-0

Navigation