Advertisement

Estimation of open water evaporation using land-based meteorological data

Original Paper
  • 73 Downloads

Abstract

Water surface evaporation is an important process in the hydrologic and energy cycles. Accurate simulation of water evaporation is important for the evaluation of water resources. In this paper, using meteorological data from the Aixinzhuang reservoir, the main factors affecting water surface evaporation were determined by the principal component analysis method. To illustrate the influence of these factors on water surface evaporation, the paper first adopted the Dalton model to simulate water surface evaporation. The results showed that the simulation precision was poor for the peak value zone. To improve the model simulation’s precision, a modified Dalton model considering relative humidity was proposed. The results show that the 10-day average relative error is 17.2%, assessed as qualified; the monthly average relative error is 12.5%, assessed as qualified; and the yearly average relative error is 3.4%, assessed as excellent. To validate its applicability, the meteorological data of Kuancheng station in the Luan River basin were selected to test the modified model. The results show that the 10-day average relative error is 15.4%, assessed as qualified; the monthly average relative error is 13.3%, assessed as qualified; and the yearly average relative error is 6.0%, assessed as good. These results showed that the modified model had good applicability and versatility. The research results can provide technical support for the calculation of water surface evaporation in northern China or similar regions.

Notes

Funding information

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support for this work provided by the National Key R & D program of China (Grant no. 2016YFC0401407) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 51579169).

References

  1. Abou Zakhem B (2016) Using principal component analysis (PCA) in the investigation of aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) in Damascus Basin (Syria). Environ Earth Sci 75(15):1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5923-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmadalipour A, Rana A, Moradkhani H, Sharma A (2017) Multi-criteria evaluation of CMIP5 GCMs for climate change impact analysis. Theor Appl Climatol 128(1–2):71–87.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-015-1695-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amin J, Mohammad M, Morteza A (2012) Experimental comparison of the ability of Dalton based and similarity theory correlations to predict water evaporation rate in different convection regimes. Heat Mass Transfer 48(8):1397–1406.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-012-0984-z
  4. Armstrong RN, Pomeroy JW, Martz LW (2008) Evaluation of three evaporation estimation methods in a Canadian prairie landscape. Hydrol Process 22(15):2801–2815.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blodgett TA, Lenters JD, Isacks BL (1997) Constraints on the origin of paleolake expansions in the Central Andes. Earth Interact 1(1):1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1087-3562(1997) 001<0001:COTOOP>2.3.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brutsaert W (1982) Evaporation into the atmosphere: theory, history, and applications. Environ Fluid Mech (Dordr) 1:1–2.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1497-6 Google Scholar
  7. Craig I, Hancock N (2004) Methods for assessing dam evaporation—an introductory paper. Irrigation Australia: Irrigation Association of Australia National Conference and Exhibition, Adelaide, 16Google Scholar
  8. Dong X, Liu TX, Yang DW, Duan LM, Wu Y, Wang TS, Wang HY, Gao XY (2015) Simulating evaporation from a water surface for the sand-meadow ecotone of the semiarid region in North China. Arid Land Geogr 38(1):10–17 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  9. Finch JW (2001) A comparison between measured and modelled open water evaporation from a reservoir in south-east England. Hydrol Process 15(14):2771–2778.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fu G, Liu C, Chen S, Hong J (2004) Investigating the conversion coefficients for free water surface evaporation of different evaporation pans. Hydrol Process 18(12):2247–2262.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5526 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gianniou SK, Antonopoulos VZ (2007) Evaporation and energy budget in Lake Vegoritis, Greece. J Hydrol 345(3–4):212–223.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007. 08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guzha AC, Nobrega RLB, Kovacs K, Rebola-Lichtenberg J, Amorim RSS, Gerold G (2015) Characterizing rainfall-runoff signatures from micro-catchments with contrasting land cover characteristics in southern Amazonia. Hydrol Process 29(4):508–521.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hostetler SW, Bartlein PJ (1990) Simulation of lake evaporation with application to modeling lake level variations of Harney–Malheur Lake, Oregon. Water Resour Res 26(10):2603–2612.  https://doi.org/10.1029/WR026i010p02603 Google Scholar
  14. Hu LS, Huang G, Qu X (2017a) Spatial and temporal features of summer extreme temperature over China during 1960-2013. Theor Appl Climatol 128(3–4):821–833.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-016-1741-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hu C, Wang YW, Wang W, Liu SD, Piao MH, Xiao W, Lee XH (2017b) Trends in evaporation of a large subtropical lake. Theor Appl Climatol 129(1–2):159–170.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-016-1768-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jodat A, Moghiman M, Anbarsooz M (2012) Experimental comparison of the ability of Dalton based and similarity theory correlations to predict water evaporation rate in different convection regimes. Heat Mass Transf 48:1397–1406.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-012-0984-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Korzukhin MD, Kolosov PA, Semenov SM (2011) Applying Dalton’s law of potential evaporation rate over the territory of Russia and neighboring countries using long-term observation data. Russ Meteorol Hydrol 36(12):786–793.  https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373911120028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li QC, Zhang ZH, Yao FQ, Zhang Y (2007) Principle component analysis of water surface evaporation in Yantai region. System Sciences and Comprehensive Studies in Agriculture 23(3):289–292 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  19. Li Z, Wang N, Li Y, Zhang Z, Li M, Dong C, Huang R (2013) Runoff simulations using water and energy balance equations in the lower reaches of the Heihe river, northwest China. Environ Earth Sci 70(1):1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-2099-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li ZL, Pan NQ, He Y, Zhang Q (2016) Evaluating the best evaporation estimate model for free water surface evaporation in hyper-arid regions: a case study in the Ejina basin, northwest China. Environ Earth Sci 75(4):1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665 -015-5090-3 Google Scholar
  21. Marsh P, Bigras SC (1988) Evaporation from Mackenzie delta lakes NWT, Canada. Arct Alp Res 20(2):220–229.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1551500 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McJannet DL, Webster IT, Cook FJ (2012) An area-dependent wind function for estimating open water evaporation using land-based meteorological data. Environ Model Softw 31:76–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.11.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Min Q (2005) Discussion on the application of gap Dalton water-surface evaporation formula. J Water Resour Res 26(3):31–34 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  24. Mu DJ (2014) Evaluation of basin water resources based on principles of eco-hydrology. Doctoral dissertation, Tianjin University, Tianjin (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  25. Rao NS (2014) Spatial control of groundwater contamination, using principal component analysis. J Earth Syst Sci 123(4):715–728.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-014- 0430-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosenberry DO, Winter TC, Buso DC, Likens GE (2007) Comparison of 15 evaporation methods applied to a small mountain lake in the northeastern USA. J Hydrol 340(3–4):149–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.03.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shakir A, Narayan CG, Ranvir S (2008) Evaluating best evaporation estimate model for water surface evaporation in semi-arid region, India. Hydrol Process 22(8):1093–1106.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Singh VP, Xu CY (1997) Evaluation and generalization of 13 mass-transfer equations for determining free water evaporation. Hydrol Process 11(3):311–332.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(19970315)11:3<311::AID-HYP446>3.0.CO;2-Y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Xu CY, Singh VP (2000) Evaluation and generalization of radiation-based methods for calculating evaporation. Hydrol Process 14(2):339–349.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(20000215)14:23.3.CO;2-F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xu CY, Singh VP (2001) Evaluation and generalization of temperature-based methods for calculating evaporation. Hydrol Process 15(2):305–319.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang X, Kang S, Zhang L, Liu J (2010) Spatial variation of climatology monthly crop reference evapotranspiration and sensitivity coefficients in Shiyang river basin of northwest China. Agric Water Manag 97(10):1506–1516.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j/agwat.2010.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zheng C, Wang Q (2014) Spatiotemporal variations of reference evapotranspiration in recent five decades in the arid land of Northwestern China. Hydrol Process 28(25):6124–6134.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and SafetyTianjin UniversityTianjinPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River BasinChina Institute of Water Resource and Hydro-power ResearchBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations