Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 133, Issue 3–4, pp 1143–1161 | Cite as

Detecting seasonal cycle shift on streamflow over Turkey by using multivariate statistical methods

  • Dogan YildizEmail author
  • Mehmet Samil Gunes
  • Fulya Gokalp Yavuz
  • Dursun Yildiz
Original Paper
  • 224 Downloads

Abstract

Climate change analysis includes the study of several types of variables such as temperature, precipitation, carbon emission, and streamflow. In this study, we focus on basin hydrology and, in particular, on streamflow values. They are geographic and climatologic indicators utilized in the study of basins. We analyze these values to better understand monthly and seasonal change over a 40-year period for all basins in Turkey. Our study differs from others by applying multivariate analysis into the streamflow data implementations rather than on trend, frequency, and/or distribution-based analysis. The characteristics of basins and climate change effects are visualized and examined with monthly data by using cluster analysis, multidimensional scaling, and gCLUTO (graphical Clustering Toolkit). As a result, we classify months as low-flow and high-flow periods. Multidimensional scaling proves that there is a clockwise movement of months from one decade to the next, which is the indicator of seasonal shift. Finally, the gCLUTO tool is utilized in a novel way in the hydrology field by revealing the seasonal change and visualizing the current changing structure of streamflow.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by Yildiz Technical University under Scientific Research Projects, numbered 2014-01-05-KAP01, named “Modeling, Forecasting and Estimation of Social, Economic and Hydrological Effect of Water Supply and Demand in Turkey on the Basin Level.”

References

  1. Anderberg MR (1973) Cluster analysis for applications. Probability and Mathematical Statistics: A Series of Monographs and Textbooks. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnell NW (1999a) Climate change and global water resources. Global environmental change 9. Supplement 1:S31–S49Google Scholar
  3. Arnell NW (1999b) The effect of climate change on hydrological regimes in Europe: a continental perspective. Glob Environ Chang 9:5–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Birsan MV (2015) Trends in monthly natural streamflow in Romania and linkages to atmospheric circulation in the North Atlantic. Water Resour Manag 29:3305-3313Google Scholar
  5. Borg I, Groenen PJF (2005) Modern multidimensional scaling. Springer-Verlag New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Borg I, Groenen PJ, Mair P (2013) Applied multidimensional scaling. Springer-Verlag, Berlin HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burke EJ, Brown SJ, Christidis N (2006) Modeling the recent evolution of global drought and projections for the twenty-first century with the Hadley Centre Climate Model. J Hydrometeorol 7:1113–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deniz A, Toros H, Incecik S (2011) Spatial variations of climate indices in Turkey. Int J Climatol 31:394–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dhillon IS, Modha DS (2001) Concept decompositions for large sparse text data using clustering. Mach Learn 42:143-175Google Scholar
  10. Gao X, Pal JS, Giorgi F (2006) Projected changes in mean and extreme precipitation over the Mediterranean region from a high resolution double nested RCM simulation. Geophysical Research Letters 33:n/a–n/aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Härdle WK, Simar L (2007) Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  12. Hulme M, Mitchell J, Ingram W, Lowe J, Johns T, New M, Viner D (1999) Climate change scenarios for global impacts studies. Global environmental change 9. Supplement 1:S3–S19Google Scholar
  13. IPCC (1996) Climate change 1995. The science of climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Iyigun C, Türkeş M, Batmaz İ, Yozgatligil C, Purutçuoğlu V, Koç E, Öztürk M (2013) Clustering current climate regions of Turkey by using a multivariate statistical method. Theor Appl Climatol 114:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kadioğlu M (1997) Trends in surface air temperature data over Turkey. Int J Climatol 17:511–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kahya E, Kalaycı S (2004) Trend analysis of streamflow in Turkey. J Hydrol 289:128–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kruskal JB (1964) Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kruskal J (1976) The relationship between multidimensional scaling and clustering. In: Ryzin JV (ed) Classification and Clustering. Proceedings of an Advanced Seminar Conducted by the Mathematics Research Center, The University of Wisconsin-Madison. Academic Press Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Malhotra KN (2010) Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation, 6/E, Pearson Education. https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=-\_qgAowhVZgC
  20. Martinez WL, Martinez AR, Solka JL (2011) Exploratory data analysis with MATLAB. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  21. Murphy JM, Mitchell JFB (1995) Transient response of the Hadley Centre Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model to increasing carbon dioxide. Part II: spatial and temporal structure of response. Journal of Climate 8:57–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nan Y, Bao-hui M, Chun-kun L (2011) Impact analysis of climate change on water resources. Procedia Engineering 24:643–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Önol B, Semazzi FHM (2009) Regionalization of climate change simulations over the eastern Mediterranean. J Clim 22:1944–1961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Paris Agreement (2017) Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations. http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php
  25. Sen B, Topcu S, Türkeş M, Warner J (2012) Projecting climate change, drought conditions and crop productivity in Turkey. Clim Res 52:175–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shepard R (1962a) The analysis of proximities: multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I Psychometrika 27:125–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shepard R (1962b) The analysis of proximities: multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. II Psychometrika 27:219–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shiklomanov IA (1997) Assessment of water resources and water availability of the world. Background report for the comprehensive assessment of the freshwater resources of the world. World Meteorological Organisation, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  29. Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1963) Principles of numerical taxonomy. W.H. Freeman, San FransiscoGoogle Scholar
  30. Steinbach M, Karypis G, Kumar V (2000) A comparison of document clustering techniques. In: KDD Workshop on Text Mining, University of MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  31. Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change. The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Tatlıdil H (1996) Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistiksel Analiz. Akademi Mat, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  33. Tayanç M, Karaca M, Yenigün O (1997) Annual and seasonal air temperature trend patterns of climate change and urbanization effects in relation to air pollutants in Turkey. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 102:1909–1919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Torgerson W (1952) Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method. Psychometrika 17:401–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tryon RC (1939) Cluster analysis. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Türkeş M (1996) Spatial and temporal analysis of annual rainfall variations in Turkey. Int J Climatol 16:1057–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Türkeş M, Sümer UM, Kiliç G (1995) Variations and trends in annual mean air temperatures in Turkey with respect to climatic variability. Int J Climatol 15:557–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Unal Y, Kindap T, Karaca M (2003) Redefining the climate zones of Turkey using cluster analysis. Int J Climatol 23:1045–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wickelmaier F (2003) An introduction to MDS, reports from the sound quality research unit (SQRU). Sound Quality Research Unit. Aalborg University, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  40. World Meteorological Organization (1997) Abridged Final Report with Resolutions and Recommendations. WMO-No. 87, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  41. Yildiz D (2015) Modeling, Forecasting and Estimation of Social, Economic and Hydrological Effects of Water Supply and Demand in Turkey on the Basin Level. Technical Report for Yildiz Technical University, Scientific Research Projects, İstanbulGoogle Scholar
  42. Yildiz D (2016) The need of new water politics, from Aral Sea to Dead Sea. LAP Lambert Academic PublishingGoogle Scholar
  43. Yildiz D, Ozguler H (2005) The water use and climate change impacts in the eastern Mediterranean region-analyses of current situation and future challenges. Mediterranean Conference on Water Resources in Mediterranean Basin, MarrakeshGoogle Scholar
  44. Young G, Householder AS (1938) Discussion of a set of points in terms of their mutual distances. Psychometrika 3:19–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhao Y, Karypis G (2004) Empirical and theoretical comparisons of selected criterion functions for document clustering. Mach Learn 55:311–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zuo D, Xu Z, Wu W, Zhao J, Zhao F (2014) Identification of streamflow response to climate change and human activities in the Wei River Basin, China. Water Resour Manag 28:833–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dogan Yildiz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mehmet Samil Gunes
    • 2
  • Fulya Gokalp Yavuz
    • 1
  • Dursun Yildiz
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of StatisticsYildiz Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Applied Research Center of Hydropolitics AssociationKavaklidere/AnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Hydropolitics AssociationKavaklidere/AnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations