Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of global climate model on performances of precipitation simulation and prediction in the Huaihe River basin

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using climate models with high performance to predict the future climate changes can increase the reliability of results. In this paper, six kinds of global climate models that selected from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) under Representative Concentration Path (RCP) 4.5 scenarios were compared to the measured data during baseline period (1960–2000) and evaluate the simulation performance on precipitation. Since the results of single climate models are often biased and highly uncertain, we examine the back propagation (BP) neural network and arithmetic mean method in assembling the precipitation of multi models. The delta method was used to calibrate the result of single model and multimodel ensembles by arithmetic mean method (MME-AM) during the validation period (2001–2010) and the predicting period (2011–2100). We then use the single models and multimodel ensembles to predict the future precipitation process and spatial distribution. The result shows that BNU-ESM model has the highest simulation effect among all the single models. The multimodel assembled by BP neural network (MME-BP) has a good simulation performance on the annual average precipitation process and the deterministic coefficient during the validation period is 0.814. The simulation capability on spatial distribution of precipitation is: calibrated MME-AM > MME-BP > calibrated BNU-ESM. The future precipitation predicted by all models tends to increase as the time period increases. The order of average increase amplitude of each season is: winter > spring > summer > autumn. These findings can provide useful information for decision makers to make climate-related disaster mitigation plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chen L, Frauenfeld OW (2014) A comprehensive evaluation of precipitation simulations over China based on CMIP5 multimodel ensemble projections. J Geophys Res-Atmos 119:5767–5786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croke B, Islam A, Ghosh J, Khan M (2011) Evaluation of approaches for estimation of rainfall and the unit hydrograph. Hydrol Res 42:372–385. doi:10.2166/nh.2011.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Z, Huang R, Huang G (2010) A weighting ensemble method by pattern correlation coefficients in sliding windows and its application to ensemble simulation and prediction of Asian summer monsoon. Chinese J Atmos Sci 1168–1186 (in Chinese)

  • Feng J, Lee D, Fu C et al (2011) Comparison of four ensemble methods combining regional climate simulations over Asia. Meteorog Atmos Phys 111:41–53

  • Gao C, Jiang T, Zhai J (2012) Analysis and prediction of climate change in the Huaihe River basin. Chin J Agrometeorl 8–17 (in Chinese)

  • Hay LE, Wilby RL, Leavesley GH (2000) A comparison of delta change and downscaled GCM scenarios for three mountainous basins in the United States. J Am Water Resour Assoc 36:387–397. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2000.tb04276.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirabayashi Y, Mahendran R, Koirala S et al (2013) Global flood risk under climate change. Nat Clim Chang 3:816–821

  • Ke Z, Dong W, Zhang P, Wang J, Zhao T (2009) An analysis of the difference between the multiple linear regression approach and the multimodel ensemble mean. Adv Atmos Sci 26:1157–1168. doi:10.1007/s00376-009-8024-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kharin VV, Zwiers FW (2002) Climate predictions with multimodel ensembles. J Clim 15:793–799. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<0793:cpwme>2.0.co;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Lv H, Ouyang F (2012a) Analysis and prediction of climate change in Huaihe River Basin based on delta method. YANGTZE RIVER 11–14+46 (in Chinese)

  • Li X, Xu Z, Cheng H (2012b) Projection of climate change with various emission scenarios over Huaihe River Basin in the 21st Century. Plateau Meteorol 1622–1635 (in Chinese)

  • Lim Y, Lee J, Oh H-S, Kang H-S (2015) Independent component regression for seasonal climate prediction: an efficient way to improve multimodel ensembles. Theor Appl Climatol 119:433–441. doi:10.1007/s00704-014-1099-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Zhang J, Wang G, Liu J, He R, Wang H, Jin J (2012) Evaluation on the influence of natural climate variability in assessing climate change impacts on water resources: II. Application in future climate. Adv Water Sci 156–162 (in Chinese)

  • Lu G, Yang Y, Wu Z, He H, Xiao H (2014) Temporal and spatial variations of snow depth in regions of the upper reaches of Yangtze River under future climate change scenarios: a study based on CMIP5 multi-model ensemble projections. Adv Water Sci 484–493 (in Chinese)

  • Luo J, Lu W, Ji Y, Ye D (2016) A comparison of three prediction models for predicting monthly precipitation in Liaoyuan city, China. Water Sci Tech-W Sup 16:845–854. doi:10.2166/ws.2016.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min Y-M, Kryjov VN, Oh SM (2014) Assessment of APCC multimodel ensemble prediction in seasonal climate forecasting: retrospective (1983–2003) and real-time forecasts (2008–2013). J Geophys Res-Atmos 119:12132–12150. doi:10.1002/2014jd022230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng PT, Kumar A, van den Dool H, Barnston AG (2002) An analysis of multimodel ensemble predictions for seasonal climate anomalies. J Geophys Res-Atmos 107 doi:10.1029/2002jd002712

  • Samanta S, Pal DK, Lohar D, Pal B (2012) Interpolation of climate variables and temperature modeling. Theor Appl Climatol 107:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarwar R, Irwin SE, King LM, Simonovic SP (2012) Assessment of climatic vulnerability in the Upper Thames River basin: downscaling with SDSM. The University of Western Ontario Department of Civiland Environmental Engineering

  • Shoaib M, Shamseldin AY, Melville BW, Khan MM (2016) A comparison between wavelet based static and dynamic neural network approaches for runoff prediction. J Hydrol 535:211–225. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh UK, Singh G, Singh V (2015) Simulation skill of APCC set of global climate models for Asian summer monsoon rainfall variability. Theor Appl Climatol 120:109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinschneider S, Lall U (2015) A hierarchical Bayesian regional model for nonstationary precipitation extremes in Northern California conditioned on tropical moisture exports. Water Resour Res 51:1472–1492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK et al (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis intergovernmental panel on climate change, working group I contribution to the IPCC fifth assessment report (AR5). Cambridge Univ Press, New York

  • Sun Q, Miao C, Duan Q (2015) Projected changes in temperature and precipitation in ten river basins over China in 21st century. Int J Climatol 35:1125–1141. doi:10.1002/joc.4043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari P, Kar S, Mohanty U, Dey S, Kumari S, Sinha P (2016) Seasonal prediction skill of winter temperature over North India. Theor Appl Climatol 124:15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Shao Q, Yang T, Yu Z, Xing W, Zhao C (2014) Multimodel ensemble projections of future climate extreme changes in the Haihe River Basin, China. Theor Appl Climatol 118:405–417. doi:10.1007/s00704-013-1068-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waseem M, Ajmal M, Kim U, Kim T-W (2016) Development and evaluation of an extended inverse distance weighting method for streamflow estimation at an ungauged site. Hydrol Res 47:333–343. doi:10.2166/nh.2015.117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu D, Yan D (2013) Projections of future climate change over Huaihe River basin by multimodel ensembles under SRES scenarios. J Lake Sci 565–575 (in Chinese)

  • Wu Y, Zhong PA, Zhang Y, Xu B, Ma B, Yan K (2015) Integrated flood risk assessment and zonation method: a case study in Huaihe River basin, China. Nat Hazards 78:635–651. doi:10.1007/s11069-015-1737-3

  • Yang H, Yang D, Hu Q, Lv H (2015) Spatial variability of the trends in climatic variables across China during 1961–2010. Theor Appl Climatol 120:773–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51579068/51609062), the Special Fund for Public Welfare Industry of the Ministry of Water Resources of China (Grant No. 201501007), and the National Key Technologies R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC0400909).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping-an Zhong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Y., Zhong, Pa., Xu, B. et al. Evaluation of global climate model on performances of precipitation simulation and prediction in the Huaihe River basin. Theor Appl Climatol 133, 191–204 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2185-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2185-7

Navigation