Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 132, Issue 1–2, pp 451–464 | Cite as

Climate change vulnerability to agrarian ecosystem of small Island: evidence from Sagar Island, India

  • S. Mandal
  • L. N. Satpati
  • B. U. Choudhury
  • S. Sadhu
Original Paper


The present study assessed climate change vulnerability in agricultural sector of low-lying Sagar Island of Bay of Bengal. Vulnerability indices were estimated using spatially aggregated biophysical and socio-economic parameters by applying principal component analysis and equal weight method. The similarities and differences of outputs of these two methods were analysed across the island. From the integration of outputs and based on the severity of vulnerability, explicit vulnerable zones were demarcated spatially. Results revealed that life subsistence agriculture in 11.8% geographical area (2829 ha) of the island along the western coast falls under very high vulnerable zone (VHVZ VI of 84–99%) to climate change. Comparatively higher values of exposure (0.53 ± 0.26) and sensitivity (0.78 ± 0.14) subindices affirmed that the VHV zone is highly exposed to climate stressor with very low adaptive capacity (ADI= 0.24 ± 0.16) to combat vulnerability to climate change. Hence, food security for a population of >22 thousands comprising >3.7 thousand agrarian households are highly exposed to climate change. Another 17% area comprising 17.5% population covering 20% villages in north-western and eastern parts of the island also falls under high vulnerable (VI= 61%–77%) zone. Findings revealed large spatial heterogeneity in the degree of vulnerability across the island and thus, demands devising area specific planning (adaptation and mitigation strategies) to address the climate change impact implications both at macro and micro levels.



Authors are thankful to the United States Geological Survey (USGS), WorldClim database, CGIAR-CSI Geoportal for providing free access to the data used. Authors are also thankful to Census of India, India Meteorological Department, District Agricultural Department (West Bengal), Survey of India, National Atlas and Thematic Mappings Organization (NATMO) for providing data at free of cost to carry out the study. Authors also duly acknowledge technical help of Dr. Abdul Fiyaz R, Scientist at Indian Institute of Rice Research, Hyderabad, while carrying out data analysis.


  1. Abdi H, Williams LJ (2010) Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 2:433–459. doi: 10.1002/wics.101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abson DJ, Dougill AJ, Stringer LC (2012) Using principal component analysis for information-rich socio-ecological vulnerability mapping in Southern Africa. Appl Geogr 35(1–2):515–524. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandyopadhyay S (1997) Natural environmental hazards and their management: a case study of Sagar Island, India. Singapore J Trop Geogr 18(1):20–45. doi: 10.1111/1467-9493.00003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barr R, Fankhauser S, Hamilton K (2010) Adaptation investments: a resource allocation framework. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 15:843–858. doi: 10.1007/s11027-010-9242-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartlett MS (1937) Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests. Proceedings of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 160:268–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhusan C, Ghosh A, Chaudhuri J, Singh K, Singh S, Shrivastava R, Das G, Bera S (2012) Living with Changing Climate- Impact, Vulnerability and Adaptation challenges in Indian Sundarbans. Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi, India. pp 1–114.
  7. Brooks N, Adger WN, Kelly PM (2005) The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national and the implications for adaptation. Glob Environ Chang 15:151–162. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cattell RB (1966) The data box: its ordering of total resources in terms of possible relational systems. In: Cattell RB (ed) Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology. Chicago, IL, Rand-McNally, pp 67–128Google Scholar
  9. Chand BK, Trivedi RK, Dubey SK, Beg MM (2012) Aquaculture in changing climate of Sundarbans. Survey Report on Climate Change Vulnerabilities, Aquaculture Practices and Coping Measures in Sagar and Basanti Blocks of Indian Sundarbans, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, Kolkata, India. Online at
  10. Choudhury BU, Das A, Kumar M, Ramesh T, Mohapatra KP, Verma BC, Ngachan SV (2013) Impact of elevated carbon dioxide and temperature on rice productivity in the mid altitude Meghalaya, Northeast India—results from a simulation study. J Agrometeorology 15:1–3Google Scholar
  11. Ericksen P, Thornton P, Notenbaert A, Cramer L, Jones P, Herrero M (2011) Mapping hotspots of climate change and food insecurity in the global tropics. CCAFS Report no. 5, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  12. Gbetibouo GA, Ringler C (2009) Mapping South African Farming Sector Vulnerability to Climate Change and Variability: A Subnational Assessment, IFPRI Discussion Paper 00885:1–38, Environment and Production Technology Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Gopinath G (2010) Critical coastal issues of Sagar Island, east coast of India. Environ Monitoring Assess 160:555–561. doi: 10.1007/s10661-008-0718-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hazra S, Samanta K, Mukhopadhyay A, Akhand A (2010) Temporal Change Detection (2001–2008) Study of Sundarban. School of Oceanographic Studies, Jadavpur University, KolkataGoogle Scholar
  15. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978. doi: 10.1002/joc.1276 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hiremath DB, Shiyani RL (2013) Analysis of vulnerability indices in various agro-climatic zones of Gujarat. Ind J Agri Econ 68(1):122–137Google Scholar
  17. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutik of, P.J. van der Linden and C.E. Hanson, eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  18. Jadhav SK, Munot AA (2009) Warming SST of Bay of Bengal and decrease in formation of cyclonic disturbances over the Indian region during southwest monsoon season. Theor Appl Climatol 96(3–4):327–336. doi: 10.1007/s00704-008-0043-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaiser HF (1960) The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas 20:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaiser HF (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kumar KN, Rajeevan M, Pai DS, Srivastava AK, Preethi B (2013) On the observed variability of monsoon droughts over India. Weather Clim Ext 1:42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.wace.2013.07.00 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lakshmi SA, Patterson Edward JK (2010) Issues and management strategy for Sagar Island environmental sciences essay. Rec Res Sci Tec 2(5):96–101Google Scholar
  23. Lee JW, Hong SY, Chang EC, Suh MS, Kang HS (2013) Assessment of future climate change over East Asia due to the RCP scenarios downscaled by GRIMs-RMP. Clim Dyn 42(3–4):733–747. doi: 10.1007/s00382-013-1841-6 Google Scholar
  24. Liu L, Ping Xie S, Zheng XT, Li T, Du Y, Huang G, Yu WD (2013) Indian Ocean variability in the CMIP5 multi-model ensemble: the zonal dipole mode. Clim Dyn 43(5–6):1715–1750. doi: 10.1007/s00382-013-2000-9 Google Scholar
  25. Majumdar RK, Das D (2011) Hydrological characterization and estimation of aquifer properties from electrical sounding data in Sagar Island region, south 24 Parganas, West Bengal, India. Asian J Earth Sci 4(2):60–74. doi: 10.3923/ajes.2011.60.74 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mandal S, Choudhury BU (2014) Estimation and prediction of maximum daily rainfall at Sagar Island using best fit probability models. Theor Appl Climatol 121(1–2):87–97. doi: 10.1007/s00704-014-1212-1 Google Scholar
  27. Mandal S, Choudhury BU, Mondal M, Bej S (2013) Trend analysis of weather variables in Sagar Island, West Bengal, India: a long-term perspective (1982–2010). Curr Sci 105:947–953Google Scholar
  28. Mandal S, Choudhury BU, Satpati LN (2015) Monsoon variability, crop water requirement, and crop planning for kharif rice in Sagar Island, India. Int J Biometeorol 59:1891–1903. doi: 10.1007/s00484- 015-0995-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Monterroso A, Conde C, Gay C, Gómez D, López J (2014) Two methods to assess vulnerability to climate change in the Mexican agricultural sector. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 19:445–461. doi: 10.1007/s11027-012-9442-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Newton A, Weichselgartner J (2014) Hotspots of coastal vulnerability: a DPSIR analysis to find societal pathways and responses. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 140:123–133. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2013.10.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. O’Brien K, Leichenko R, Kelkar U, Venema H, Aandahl G, Tompkins H, Javed A, Bhadwal S, Barg S, Nygaard L, West J (2004) Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and globalization in India. Glob Environ Chang 14:303–313. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rao RCA, Raju BMK, Subba Rao AVM, Rao KV, Rao VUM, Ramachandran K, Venkateswarlu B, Sikka AK, Rao SM, Maheswari M, Rao CH (2016) A district level assessment of vulnerability of Indian agriculture to climate change. Curr Sci 110(10):1939–1945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ravindranath NH, Rao S, Sharma N, Nair M, Gopalakrishnan R, Rao AS, Malaviya S, Tiwari R, Sagadevan A, Munsi M, Krishna N, Bala G (2011) Climate change vulnerability profiles for North East India. Curr Sci 101(3):384–394Google Scholar
  34. Sehgal VK, Singh MR, Chaudhary A, Jain N, Pathak H (2013) Vulnerability of agriculture to climate change: district level assessment in the indo-Gangetic Plains. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi p 74Google Scholar
  35. Sengupta A, Rajeevan M (2013) Uncertainty quantification and reliability analysis of CMIP5 projections for the Indian summer monsoon. Curr Sci 105(12):1692–1703Google Scholar
  36. Stelzenmüller V, Ellis JR, Rogers SI (2010) Towards a spatially explicit risk assessment for marine management: assessing the vulnerability of fish to aggregate extraction. Biol Conserv 143(1):230–238. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Trabucco A, Zomer RJ (2009) Global Aridity Index (Global-Aridity) and Global Potential Evapo-Transpiration (Global-PET) Geospatial Database. CGIAR Consortium for Spatial Information. Published online, available from the CGIAR-CSI GeoPortal at: UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2006) Calculating the Human Development Indices, Technical Note 1 in Human Development Report.
  38. Young BE, Byers E, Hammerson G, Frances A, Oliver L, Treher A (2015) Guidelines for using the NatureServe Climate Change Vulnerability Index Release 3.0 Nature Serve, Arlington, Virginia, USAGoogle Scholar
  39. Zomer RJ, Trabucco A, Bossio DA, van Straaten O, Verchot LV (2008) Climate change mitigation: a spatial analysis of global land suitability for clean development mechanism afforestation and reforestation. Agri Ecosys and Environ126:67–80. doi 10.1016/j.agee.2008.01.014
  40. Zomer RJ, Trabucco A, van Straaten, O, Bossio DA (2007) Carbon, land and water: A global analysis of the hydrologic dimensions of climate change mitigation through afforestation/reforestation. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute. (IWMI Research Report 101). pp 44Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Mandal
    • 1
  • L. N. Satpati
    • 1
  • B. U. Choudhury
    • 2
  • S. Sadhu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of CalcuttaKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Division of NRM (Soil Science)ICAR Research Complex for NEH RegionUmiamIndia

Personalised recommendations