Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 132, Issue 1–2, pp 491–502 | Cite as

Impact of climate change on runoff in Lake Urmia basin, Iran

  • Hadi Sanikhani
  • Ozgur Kisi
  • Babak Amirataee
Original Paper

Abstract

Investigation of the impact of climate change on water resources is very necessary in dry and arid regions. In the first part of this paper, the climate model Long Ashton Research Station Weather Generator (LARS-WG) was used for downscaling climate data including rainfall, solar radiation, and minimum and maximum temperatures. Two different case studies including Aji-Chay and Mahabad-Chay River basins as sub-basins of Lake Urmia in the northwest part of Iran were considered. The results indicated that the LARS-WG successfully downscaled the climatic variables. By application of different emission scenarios (i.e., A1B, A2, and B1), an increasing trend in rainfall and a decreasing trend in temperature were predicted for both the basins over future time periods. In the second part of this paper, gene expression programming (GEP) was applied for simulating runoff of the basins in the future time periods including 2020, 2055, and 2090. The input combination including rainfall, solar radiation, and minimum and maximum temperatures in current and prior time was selected as the best input combination with highest predictive power for runoff prediction. The results showed that the peak discharge will decrease by 50 and 55.9% in 2090 comparing with the baseline period for the Aji-Chay and Mahabad-Chay basins, respectively. The results indicated that the sustainable adaptation strategies are necessary for these basins for protection of water resources in future.

Keywords

Climate change LARS-WG GEP Aji-Chay Mahabad-Chay 

References

  1. Aytek A, Alp M (2008) An application of artificial intelligence for rainfall-runoff modeling. J Earth Syst Sci 117(2):145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aytek A, Kisi Ö (2008) A genetic programming approach to suspended sediment modelling. J Hydrol 351(3):288–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang J, Wang Y, Istanbulluoglu E, Bai T, Huang Q, Yang D, Huang S (2014) Impact of climate change and human activities on runoff in the Weihe River basin. Quaternary International, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiew FHS, Whetton PH, McMahon TA, Pittock AB (1995) Simulation of the impacts of climate change on runoff and soil moisture in Australian catchments. J Hydrol 167(1):121–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dong B, Sutton T (2005) Mechanism of Interdecadal thermohaline circulation variability in a coupled ocean–atmosphere GCM. J Clim 18:1117–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fatichi S, Ivanov VY, Caporali E (2011) Simulation of future climate scenarios with a weather generator. Adv Water Resour 34(4):448–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferreira C (2001) Gene expression programming: a new adaptive algorithm for solving problems. Complex Syst 13(2):87–129Google Scholar
  8. Ferreira C (2006) Gene expression programming: mathematical modeling by an artificial intelligence, 2nd edn. Springer, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  9. Firat M, Gungor M (2007) River flow estimation using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system. Math Comput Simul 75(3):87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fujihara Y, Tanaka K, Watanabe T, Nagano T, Kojiri T (2008) Assessing the impacts of climate change on the water resources of the Seyhan River basin in Turkey: use of dynamically downscaled data for hydrologic simulations. J Hydrol 353(1):33–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guven A, & Aytek A (2009) New approach for stage–discharge relationship: gene-expression programming. J Hydrol Eng 14(8): 812–820Google Scholar
  12. Hashmi MZ, Shamseldin AY (2014) Use of gene expression programming in regionalization of flow duration curve. Adv Water Resour 68:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hashmi MZ, Shamseldin AY, Melville BW (2011) Statistical downscaling of watershed precipitation using gene expression programming (GEP). Environ Model Softw 26(12):1639–1646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hassan Z, Shamsudin S, Harun S (2014) Application of SDSM and LARS-WG for simulating and downscaling of rainfall and temperature. Theor Appl Climatol 116(1–2):243–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, (2007). Fourth Assessment Report, Climate Change.Google Scholar
  16. Jiang T, Chen YD, Xu CY, Chen X, Chen X, Singh VP (2007) Comparison of hydrological impacts of climate change simulated by six hydrological models in the Dongjiang Basin, South China. J Hydrol 336(3):316–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson GL, Hanson CL, Hardegree SP, Ballard EB (1996) Stochastic weather simulation: overview and analysis of two commonly used models. J Appl Meteorol 35(10):1878–1896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaleris V, Papanastasopoulos D, Lagas G (2001) Case study on impact of atmospheric circulation changes on river basin hydrology: uncertainty aspects. J Hydrol 245(1):137–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khan MS, Coulibaly P, Dibike Y (2006) Uncertainty analysis of statistical downscaling methods. J Hydrol 319(1):357–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kisi O, Sanikhani H (2015) Modelling long-term monthly temperatures by several data-driven methods using geographical inputs. Int J Climatol 35(13):3834–3846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kisi O, Shiri J, Tombul M (2013) Modeling rainfall-runoff process using soft computing techniques. Comput Geosci 51:108–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kisi O, Sanikhani H, Zounemat-Kermani M, Niazi F (2015) Long-term monthly evapotranspiration modeling by several data-driven methods without climatic data. Comput Electron Agric 115:66–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lu Y, Qin XS, Xie YJ (2016) An integrated statistical and data-driven framework for supporting flood risk analysis under climate change. J Hydrol 533:28–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Matondo JI, Peter G, Msibi KM (2004) Evaluation of the impact of climate change on hydrology and water resources in Swaziland: part II. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 29(15):1193–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mehdizadeh S, Behmanesh J, Khalili K (2017) Application of gene expression programming to predict daily dew point temperature. Appl Therm Eng 112:1097–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nkomozepi T, Chung SO (2014) The effects of climate change on the water resources of the Geumho River basin, Republic of Korea. J Hydro Environ Res 8(4):358–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nourani V, Baghanam AH, Adamowski J, Kisi O (2014) Applications of hybrid wavelet–artificial intelligence models in hydrology: a review. J Hydrol 514:358–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Parajuli PB, Jayakody P, Sassenrath GF, Ouyang Y (2016) Assessing the impacts of climate change and tillage practices on stream flow, crop and sediment yields from the Mississippi River basin. Agric Water Manag 168:112–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Racsko P, Szeidl L, Semenov M (1991) A serial approach to local stochastic weather models. Ecol Model 57(1):27–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Savic DA, Walters GA, Davidson JW (1999) A genetic programming approach to rainfall-runoff modelling. Water Resour Manag 13(3):219–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Semenov MA, Barrow EM (1997) Use of a stochastic weather generator in the development of climate change scenarios. Clim Chang 35(4):397–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Semenov MA, Brooks RJ, Barrow EM, Richardson CW (1998) Comparison of the WGEN and LARS-WG stochastic weather generators for diverse climates. Clim Res 10(2):95–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Semenov MA, Barrow EM, Lars-Wg A (2002) A stochastic weather generator for use in climate impact studies. User Manual, HertfordshireGoogle Scholar
  34. Semenov MA, Donatelli M, Stratonovitch P, Chatzidaki E, Baruth B (2010) ELPIS: a dataset of local-scale daily climate scenarios for Europe. Climate Res (Open Access for articles 4 years old and older) 44(1):3Google Scholar
  35. Srikanthan R, McMahon TA (2001) Stochastic generation of annual, monthly and daily climate data: a review. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 5(4):653–670Google Scholar
  36. Vallam P, Qin XS (2016) Climate change impact assessment on flow regime by incorporating spatial correlation and scenario uncertainty. Theor Appl Climatol. doi: 10.1007/s00704-016-1802-1 Google Scholar
  37. Wang WC, Chau KW, Cheng CT, Qiu L (2009) A comparison of performance of several artificial intelligence methods for forecasting monthly discharge time series. J Hydrol 374(3):294–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zarghami M, Abdi A, Babaeian I, Hassanzadeh Y, Kanani R (2011) Impacts of climate change on runoffs in East Azerbaijan, Iran. Glob Planet Chang 78(3):137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zheng YQ, Qian ZC, He HR, Liu HP, Zeng XM, Yu G (2007) Simulations of water resource environmental changes in China during the last 20000 years by a regional climate model. Glob Planet Chang 55(4):284–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zorn CR, Shamseldin AY (2015) Peak flood estimation using gene expression programming. J Hydrol 531:1122–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zounemat-Kermani M, Rajaee T, Ramezani-Charmahineh A, Adamowski JF (2017) Estimating the aeration coefficient and air demand in bottom outlet conduits of dams using GEP and decision tree methods. Flow Meas Instrum 54:9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Water Engineering Department, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of KurdistanSanandajIran
  2. 2.Center for Interdisciplinary ResearchInternational Black Sea UniversityTbilisiGeorgia
  3. 3.Water Engineering DepartmentUrmia UniversityUrmiaIran

Personalised recommendations