Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 122, Issue 3–4, pp 531–541 | Cite as

Urban field classification by “local climate zones” in a medium-sized Central European city: the case of Olomouc (Czech Republic)

  • Michal Lehnert
  • Jan Geletič
  • Jan Husák
  • Miroslav Vysoudil
Original Paper

Abstract

The stations of the Metropolitan Station Network in Olomouc (Czech Republic) were assigned to local climatic zones, and the temperature characteristics of the stations were compared. The classification of local climatic zones represents an up-to-date concept for the unification of the characterization of the neighborhoods of climate research sites. This study is one of the first to provide a classification of existing stations within local climate zones. Using a combination of GIS-based analyses and field research, the values of geometric and surface cover properties were calculated, and the stations were subsequently classified into the local climate zones. It turned out that the classification of local climatic zones can be efficiently used for representative documentation of the neighborhood of the climate stations. To achieve a full standardization of the description of the neighborhood of a station, the classification procedures, including the methods used for the processing of spatial data and methods used for the indication of specific local characteristics, must be also standardized. Although the main patterns of temperature differences between the stations with a compact rise, those with an open rise and the stations with no rise or sparsely built areas were evident; the air temperature also showed considerable differences within particular zones. These differences were largely caused by various geometric layout of development and by unstandardized placement of the stations. For the direct comparison of temperatures between zones, particularly those stations which have been placed in such a way that they are as representative as possible for the zone in question should be used in further research.

References

  1. Arnfield AJ (2003) Two decades of urban climate research: a review of turbulence, exchanges of energy and water, and the urban heat island. Int J Climatol. doi:10.1002/joc.859 Google Scholar
  2. Bechtel B (2012) Classification of local climate zones from multitemporal remote sensing data. Urban Clim News 46:7–14Google Scholar
  3. Bechtel B, Daneke C (2012) Classification of local climate zones based on multiple earth observation data. IEEE J Sel Top Appl. doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2012.2189873 Google Scholar
  4. Bokwa A (2011) The urban heat island in Kraków, Poland: interaction between land use and relief. Mor Geogr Rep 19(3):2–7Google Scholar
  5. Fenner D, Meier F, Scherer D, Polze A (2014) Spatial and temporal air temperature variability in Berlin, Germany, during the years 2001–2010. Urban Clim. doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2014.02.004 Google Scholar
  6. Fortuniak K, Kłysik K, Wibik J (2006) Urban–rural contrasts of meteorological parameters in Łódź. Theor Appl Climatol. doi:10.1007/s00704-005-0147-y Google Scholar
  7. Grimmond CSB (2006) Progress in measuring and observing the urban atmosphere. Theor Appl Climatol. doi:10.1007/s00704-005-0140-5 Google Scholar
  8. Houet T, Pigeon G (2011) Mapping urban climate zones and quantifying climate behaviors—an application on Toulouse urban area (France). Environ Pollut. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2010.12.027 Google Scholar
  9. Huwald H, Higgins CW, Boldi MO, Bou-Zeid E, Lehning M, Parlange MB (2009) Albedo effect on radiative errors in air temperature measurements. Water Resour Res. doi:10.1029/2008WR007600 Google Scholar
  10. Kłysik K, Fortuniak K (1999) Temporal and spatial characteristics of the urban heat island of Łódź. Pol Atmos Environ. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00131-4 Google Scholar
  11. Lelovics E, Unger J, Gál T, Gál V (2014) Design of an urban monitoring network based on local climate zone mapping and temperature pattern modelling. Clim Res. doi:10.3354/cr01220 Google Scholar
  12. Merbitz H, Buttstädt M, Michael S, Dott W, Schneider C (2012) GIS-based identification of spatial variables enhancing heat and poor air quality in urban areas. Appl Geogr. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.06.008 Google Scholar
  13. Muller CL, Lee C, Grimmond CSB, Young DT, Cai XM (2013) Toward a standardized metadata protocol for urban meteorological networks. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00096.1 Google Scholar
  14. Nakamura R, Mahrt L (2005) Air temperature measurement errors in naturally ventilated radiation shields. J Atmos Ocean Technol. doi:10.1175/JTECH1762.1 Google Scholar
  15. Offerle B, Grimmond CSB, Fortuniak K (2005) Heat storage and anthropogenic heat flux in relation to the energy balance of a central European city centre. Int J Climatol. doi:10.1002/joc.1198 Google Scholar
  16. Offerle B, Grimmond CSB, Fortuniak K, Kłysik K, Oke TR (2006) Temporal variations in heat fluxes over a central European city centre. Theor Appl Climatol. doi:10.1007/s00704-005-0148-x Google Scholar
  17. Oke TR (2004) Urban Climate Zones [unpublished]. In: Oke TR (2006b) Initial guidance to obtain representative meteorological observations at urban sites. IOM Report 81. World Meteorological Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  18. Oke TR (2006a) Towards better scientific communication in urban climate. Theor Appl Climatol. doi:10.1007/s00704-005-0153-0 Google Scholar
  19. Oke TR (2006b) Initial guidance to obtain representative meteorological observations at urban sites. IOM Report 81. World Meteorological Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  20. Ptáček P, Fňukal M, Szczyrba Z (2007) Metamorphoses of the spatial structure of Olomouc; featuring the residential function. Urbanismus a územní rozvoj 10(2):19–26 (in Czech)Google Scholar
  21. Roth M (2000) Review of atmospheric turbulence over cities. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc. doi:10.1002/qj.49712656409 Google Scholar
  22. Ryan PH, LeMasters GK (2007) A review of land-use regression models for characterizing intraurban air pollution exposure. Inhal Toxicol. doi:10.1080/08958370701495998 Google Scholar
  23. Scherer D, Fehrenbach U, Beha HD, Parlow E (1999) Improved concepts and methods in analysis and evaluation of the urban climate for optimizing urban planning processes. Atmos Environ. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00161-2 Google Scholar
  24. Stewart ID (2007) Landscape representation and the urban–rural dichotomy in empirical urban heat island literature, 1950–2006. Acta Climatol Chorol Univ Szegediensis 40–41:111–121Google Scholar
  25. Stewart ID (2011) A systematic review and scientific critique of methodology in modern urban heat island literature. Int J Climatol. doi:10.1002/joc.2141 Google Scholar
  26. Stewart ID, Oke TR (2009a) A new classification system for urban climate sites. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90:922–923Google Scholar
  27. Stewart ID, Oke TR (2009b) Classifying urban climate field sites by local climate zones: The case of Nagano, Japan. Preprints, Seventh Int. Conf. on Urban Climate, Yokohama, Japan, Int. Assoc. Urban Climate. http://www.ide.titech.ac.jp/~icuc7/extended_abstracts/pdf/385055-1-090515165722-002.pdf. Accessed 5 April 2013
  28. Stewart ID, Oke TR (2012) Local climate zones for urban temperature studies. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00019.2 Google Scholar
  29. Stewart ID, Oke TR, Krayenhoff ES (2013) Evaluation of the ‘local climate zone’ scheme using temperature observations and model simulations. Int J Climatol. doi:10.1002/joc.3746 Google Scholar
  30. Unger J, Zoltán S, Zoboki J (2001) Temperature cross-section features in an urban area. Atmos Res. doi:10.1016/S0169-8095(01)00087-47 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michal Lehnert
    • 1
  • Jan Geletič
    • 2
  • Jan Husák
    • 1
  • Miroslav Vysoudil
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geography, Faculty of SciencePalacký University OlomoucOlomoucCzech Republic
  2. 2.Institute of Geography, Faculty of ScienceMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations