The stations of the Metropolitan Station Network in Olomouc (Czech Republic) were assigned to local climatic zones, and the temperature characteristics of the stations were compared. The classification of local climatic zones represents an up-to-date concept for the unification of the characterization of the neighborhoods of climate research sites. This study is one of the first to provide a classification of existing stations within local climate zones. Using a combination of GIS-based analyses and field research, the values of geometric and surface cover properties were calculated, and the stations were subsequently classified into the local climate zones. It turned out that the classification of local climatic zones can be efficiently used for representative documentation of the neighborhood of the climate stations. To achieve a full standardization of the description of the neighborhood of a station, the classification procedures, including the methods used for the processing of spatial data and methods used for the indication of specific local characteristics, must be also standardized. Although the main patterns of temperature differences between the stations with a compact rise, those with an open rise and the stations with no rise or sparsely built areas were evident; the air temperature also showed considerable differences within particular zones. These differences were largely caused by various geometric layout of development and by unstandardized placement of the stations. For the direct comparison of temperatures between zones, particularly those stations which have been placed in such a way that they are as representative as possible for the zone in question should be used in further research.
Urban Heat Island Maximum Daily Temperature Urban Climate Lower Maximum Temperature Geometric Layout
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This research project was funded by the Czech Grant Agency, Project No. 205/09/1297: “Multilevel analysis of the urban and suburban climate taking medium-sized towns as an example”.
Arnfield AJ (2003) Two decades of urban climate research: a review of turbulence, exchanges of energy and water, and the urban heat island. Int J Climatol. doi:10.1002/joc.859Google Scholar
Bechtel B (2012) Classification of local climate zones from multitemporal remote sensing data. Urban Clim News 46:7–14Google Scholar
Lelovics E, Unger J, Gál T, Gál V (2014) Design of an urban monitoring network based on local climate zone mapping and temperature pattern modelling. Clim Res. doi:10.3354/cr01220Google Scholar
Merbitz H, Buttstädt M, Michael S, Dott W, Schneider C (2012) GIS-based identification of spatial variables enhancing heat and poor air quality in urban areas. Appl Geogr. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.06.008Google Scholar
Muller CL, Lee C, Grimmond CSB, Young DT, Cai XM (2013) Toward a standardized metadata protocol for urban meteorological networks. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00096.1Google Scholar
Nakamura R, Mahrt L (2005) Air temperature measurement errors in naturally ventilated radiation shields. J Atmos Ocean Technol. doi:10.1175/JTECH1762.1Google Scholar
Offerle B, Grimmond CSB, Fortuniak K (2005) Heat storage and anthropogenic heat flux in relation to the energy balance of a central European city centre. Int J Climatol. doi:10.1002/joc.1198Google Scholar
Offerle B, Grimmond CSB, Fortuniak K, Kłysik K, Oke TR (2006) Temporal variations in heat fluxes over a central European city centre. Theor Appl Climatol. doi:10.1007/s00704-005-0148-xGoogle Scholar
Oke TR (2004) Urban Climate Zones [unpublished]. In: Oke TR (2006b) Initial guidance to obtain representative meteorological observations at urban sites. IOM Report 81. World Meteorological Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
Scherer D, Fehrenbach U, Beha HD, Parlow E (1999) Improved concepts and methods in analysis and evaluation of the urban climate for optimizing urban planning processes. Atmos Environ. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00161-2Google Scholar
Stewart ID (2007) Landscape representation and the urban–rural dichotomy in empirical urban heat island literature, 1950–2006. Acta Climatol Chorol Univ Szegediensis 40–41:111–121Google Scholar
Stewart ID (2011) A systematic review and scientific critique of methodology in modern urban heat island literature. Int J Climatol. doi:10.1002/joc.2141Google Scholar
Stewart ID, Oke TR (2009a) A new classification system for urban climate sites. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90:922–923Google Scholar