Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 120, Issue 1–2, pp 323–330 | Cite as

How robust is the pre-1931 National Climatic Data Center—climate divisional dataset? Examples from Georgia and Louisiana

Original Paper

Abstract

The National Climatic Data Center’s climate divisional dataset (CDD) is commonly used in climate change analyses. This dataset is a spatially continuous dataset for the conterminous USA from 1895 to the present. The CDD since 1931 is computed by averaging all available representative cooperative weather station data into a single monthly value for each of the 344 climate divisions of the conterminous USA, while pre-1931 data for climate divisions are derived from statewide averages using regression equations. This study examines the veracity of these pre-1931 data. All available Cooperative Observer Program (COOP) stations within each climate division in Georgia and Louisiana were averaged into a single monthly value for each month and each climate division from 1897 to 1930 to generate a divisional dataset (COOP DD), using similar methods to those used by the National Climatic Data Center to generate the post-1931 CDD. The reliability of the official CDD—derived from statewide averages—to produce temperature and precipitation means and trends prior to 1931 are then evaluated by comparing that dataset with the COOP DD with difference-of-means tests, correlations, and linear regression techniques. The CDD and the COOP DD are also compared to a divisional dataset derived from the United States Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) data (USHCN DD), with difference of means and correlation techniques, to demonstrate potential impacts of inhomogeneities within the CDD and the COOP DD. The statistical results, taken as a whole, not only indicate broad similarities between the CDD and COOP DD but also show that the CDD does not adequately portray pre-1931 temperature and precipitation in certain climate divisions within Georgia and Louisiana. In comparison with the USHCN DD, both the CDD and the COOP DD appear to be subject to biases that probably result from changing stations within climate divisions. As such, the CDD should be used judiciously for long-term studies of climate change, and past studies using the CDD should be evaluated in the context of these new findings.

Keywords

Total Annual Precipitation National Climatic Data Climate Division Coop Station Weather Station Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abatzoglou JT, Redmond KT, Edwards LM (2009) Classification of regional climate variability in the state of California. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 48:1527–1541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allard J, Keim BD (2006) Spuriously induced temperature trends in the Southeast United States. Theor Appl Climatol 88:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allard J, Keim BD, Chassereau JE, Sathiara D (2009) Spuriously induced precipitation trends in the Southeast United States. Theor Appl Climatol 96:173–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Easterling DR, Karl TR, Mason EH, Hughes PY, Bowman DP (1996) United States Historical Climatology Network (U.S. HCN) Monthly temperature and precipitation data. ORNL/CDIAC-87, NDP-019/R3. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak RidgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Easterling DR, Karl TR, Lawrimore JH, Del Greco SA (1999) United States Historical Climatology Network daily temperature, precipitation, and snow data for 1871–1997. ORNL/CDIAC-118, NDP-070. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak RidgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Easterling DR, Wallis TWR, Lawrimore JH, Heim RR Jr (2007) Effects of temperature and precipitation trends on U.S. Drought. Geophys Res Lett 34: doi: 10.1029/2007GL031541
  7. Guttman NB, Quayle RG (1996) A historical perspective of U.S. climate divisions. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hughes PY, Mason EH, Karl TR, Brower WA (1992) United States Historical Climatology Network daily temperature and precipitation data. ORNL/CDIAC-50, NDP-042. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak RidgeGoogle Scholar
  9. IPCC (2007) In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Karl TR, Metcalf LK, Nicodemus ML, Quayle RG (1983) Statewide average climate history. historical climatology series 6–1, National Climatic Data Center, 23–39 pp. per state [Available from National Climatic Data Center, 151 Patton Ave., Asheville, NC 28801]Google Scholar
  11. Karl TR, Williams CN Jr, Quinlan FT (1990) United States Historical Climatology Network (HCN) Serial temperature and precipitation data. ORNL/CDIAC-30, NDP-019/R1. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak RidgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Karl TR, Quayle RG, Groisman PY (1993) Detecting climate variations and change: new challenges for observing and data management systems. J Clim 6:1481–1494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Keim BD, Wilson A, Wake CP, Huntington T (2003) Are there spurious temperature trends in the United States Climate Division database? Geophys Res Lett 30: doi: 10.1029/2002GL016295
  14. Keim BD, Fisher MR, Wilson AM (2005) Are there spurious precipitation trends in precipitation trends in the United States Climate Division database? Geophys Res Lett 32: doi: 10.1029/2004GL021985
  15. LaDochy S, Medina R, Patzert W (2007) Recent California climate variability: spatial and temporal patterns in temperature trends. Clim Res 33:159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leathers DJ, Grunstein AJ, Ellis AW (2000) Growing season moisture deficits across the Northeastern United States. Clim Res 14:43–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCabe GJ, Clark MP (2005) Trends and variability in snowmelt runoff in the Western United States. J Hydrometeorol 6:476–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McRoberts DB, Nielsen-Gammon JW (2011) A new homogenized climate division precipitation dataset for analysis of climate variability and change. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 50:1187–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Menne MJ, Williams CN Jr, Vose RS (2009) The United States historical climatology network monthly temperature data—version 2. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90:993–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Menne MJ, Williams CN Jr, Vose RS (2013) United States Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) Version 2.5 Serial Monthly Dataset. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak RidgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Muller RA, Keim BD, Hoff JL (1990) Application of climatic divisional data to flood interpretations: an example from Louisiana. Phys Geogr 11:353–362Google Scholar
  22. Quinlan FT, Karl TR, Williams CN Jr (1987) United States Historical Climatology Network (HCN) serial temperature and precipitation data. NDP-019. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak RidgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Rogers J (2013) The 20th century cooling trend over the Southeastern United States. Clim Dyn 40:341–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Seager R, Tzanova A, Nakamura J (2009) Drought in the Southeastern United States: causes, variability over the last millennium, and the potential for future hydroclimate change. J Clim 22:5021–5045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Svoboda M, LeComte D, Hayes M, Heim R, Gleason K, Angel J, Rippey B, Tinker R, Palecki M, Stooksbury D, Miskus D, Stephens S (2002) The drought monitor. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83:1181–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vose RS, Applequist S, Squires M, Durre I, Menne MJ, Williams Jr CN, Fenimore C, Gleason K, Arndt D (2014) Improved historical temperature and precipitation time series for U.S. climate divisions. J Appl Meteorol Climatol, in press, doi: 10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0248.1
  27. Wells N, Goddard S, Hayes MJ (2004) A self-calibrating palmer drought severity index. J Clim 17:2335–2351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wolter K, Allured D (2007) New climate divisions for monitoring and predicting—climate in the U.S. Intermt West Clim Summ 5:1–6Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics, Astronomy, and GeosciencesValdosta State UniversityValdostaUSA
  2. 2.Department of GeographyThe University of KansasLawrenceUSA
  3. 3.Department of Geography and AnthropologyLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations